MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W401644316

Introduction to the NAAE 2012 Presentations: "The Ecumenical Legacy of the Second Vatican Council, 50 Years Later"

2013· article· en· W401644316 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lorelei F. Fuchs

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of ecumenical studies · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueReligion, Society, and Development
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEcumenismProtestantismChristianityWitnessTheologyCanon lawHoly SeeEvangelismMissiologyReligious studiesSociologyPapal infallibilityLawHistoryPolitical sciencePhilosophy
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

As did many theological gatherings during 201:2, annual conference of North American Academy of Ecumenists celebrated fiftieth anniversary of Second Vatican Council (1962-65). At its meeting in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, September 21-23, 2012, papers were presented by an illustrious ensemble of theologians whose academic portfolios hold Christian unity and ecumenical movement at center. Addressing conference theme, The Ecumenical Legacy of Second Vatican Council, major speakers represented ecumenical landscape of mainline Christianity--Orthodox, Anglican, and Protestant churches, with members of Catholic Church among participants in local dialogical panel. Each presentation and conversation that followed witnessed not only to reception of Vatican II but also to reality that Vatican II is not Catholic affair. It was--is--an event to which, in one way or another, all churches lay claim, so much so that post-conciliar Christian theology came to be done ecumenically. most influential factors in this shift from denominational to ecumenical sensibility is increase of interchurch outreach in social justice and advocacy and growth of interchurch dialogues, particularly bilateral dialogue, which was largely Catholic initiative during ensuing years after council. Witness to latter's maturation is Harvesting Project initiated by Cardinal Walter Kasper while president of Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity. (1) Furthermore, doing theology ecumenically is nurtured by movements upon which ecumenical movement draws, three of which are missionary movement, biblical movement, and movement--each also focus of Vatican II. United Methodist Church minister, Rev. Dr. Karen Westerfield Tucker, made this clear in opening address. After survey of observations from Christians of diverse churches, some who attended council, she measured its ecumenical legacy through her liturgical lens, (2) with focus on recognition of baptism and use of texts. It is in context of baptism that Unitatis redintegratio, no. 3, refers to certain, though imperfect, communion that baptized Christians of other churches have with Catholic Church. Hence, Dr. Westerfield Tucker noted, baptismal question is also ecclesiological question. This is most evident in texts. She stressed significance not only of common shape of liturgy but also of a relatively close Sunday-by-Sunday sharing of scriptural readings when Revised Common Lectionary is used. (3) Her liturgical lens offers unique insights into interconnectedness of Christians and their churches, thanks to ecumenical findings in bilateral and multilateral contexts. An Orthodox perspective on Vatican II's ecumenical legacy was presented by Dr. Despina Prassas, Greek Orthodox. She gives three perspectives: the importance of dialogue; ... increased importance of role of conciliarity in life of Church ... and ... influence of council on dismantling of communist system in many Eastern European countries. (4) Her focus on dialogue is dialogue between Orthodox churches and Catholic Church, which is fruit of process that led to presence of Orthodox at council. Her attention to renewed emphasis on conciliarity concerns work of the magisterium of bishops in union with Roman pontiff, stressing that they, too, enjoy Holy Spirit's assistance when they define point of faith in conjunction with successor of Peter. (5) Dr. Prassas noted that for Orthodoxy the concept of conciliarity extends also to laity, concluding her thoughts on conciliarity by stating: Perhaps greatest testimony ... of ... conciliarity is reciprocal use of term 'sister churches' by Catholic Church and Orthodox Church. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,093
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,312

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,001
Communication savante0,0050,002
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0930,028

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,051
Tête enseignante GPT0,335
Écart entre enseignants0,284 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of ecumenical studiesMême sujetReligion, Society, and DevelopmentTravaux en français237 207