MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W41017097

Time Use of Self-Employed Parents: Gender, Caregiving, Well-being and Balance

2011· article· en· W41017097 sur OpenAlex
Margo Hilbrecht, Donna S. Lero, Carolyn Pletsch

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueCommonKnowledge Research Repository (Pacific University Oregon) · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueWork-Family Balance Challenges
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBalance (ability)PsychologyDevelopmental psychology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Some parents are drawn to self-employment because of the perceived flexibility to balance multiple roles. Mothers, in particular, may seek self-employment to better manage the domestic ‘double shift’ (Hughes, 2006; Walker & Webster, 2006), and more often than fathers cite self-employment as a strategy to integrate work and family responsibilities (Gray & Hughes, 2005). But disadvantages associated with selfemployment like longer work hours, unpredictable schedules, and less leisure can affect feelings of balance (Hyytinen & Ruuskanen, 2007). This study explores the effects of self-employment on parents’ time use and perceptions of well-being, and whether these effects differ by gender. It uses a ‘relational time’ perspective, which suggests time is allocated and given meaning in relation to the needs, demands and desires of significant others (Odih, 1999).\nUsing weighted time diary data from the 2005 Canadian General Social Survey, time use patterns for 3,595 parents with at least one child at home (< 19 years) were compared for both self-employed (n=696) and employee parents (n=2,899). Well-being was measured by perceptions of time pressure, stress, job and life satisfaction, and satisfaction with work-life balance. Predictor variables for multivariate analysis included household composition, marital status, preschooler at home, education, immigrant status, and employment hours.\nTime use patterns were similar among employee and self-employed parents. When analyzed by gender, differences emerged according to employment arrangement. Compared to employees, self-employed mothers spent less time working for pay, and more time in direct caregiving and with children present. Self-employed fathers spent less time on routine activities such as children’s physical care and housework than employed fathers. Self-employed parents had significantly higher job satisfaction and overall satisfaction with life, but perceptions of stress were similar to employee parents. Time pressure was lower for fathers than mothers, with no difference by employment status. Mothers reported less satisfaction with work-life balance; however, self-employed fathers were significantly more dissatisfied with work-life balance than other fathers.\nOccupational characteristics of self-employment may help mothers create balance in the absence of employment policies ensuring flexibility. Job satisfaction is greater, but the instability of self-employment or other factors may undermine work-life balance for fathers. Different outcomes in both time use and well-being indicate the importance of sensitivity to gender and role expectations when examining occupational experiences of self-employed parents.\nSuggested discussion questions: Why might self-employment have no effect on parents’ levels of stress or time pressure, even though job satisfaction is much higher compared to parents who are employees? How might occupational class and/or occupational sector affect the experience of selfemployment in terms of feelings of balance and overall satisfaction with life? What insights do time diary data bring to understanding mothers’ and fathers’ experiences of selfemployment? What are some of the shortcomings of time diary data that could be addressed in future research?

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,491
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,002
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,085
Tête enseignante GPT0,294
Écart entre enseignants0,209 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle