MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W41201907

Laryngeal Cancer and Asbestos Exposure: What Singing Teachers Should Know

2013· article· en· W41201907 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Singing · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueVoice and Speech Disorders
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSingingCausationEvent (particle physics)MedicinePsychologyMedical educationLaw
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

SINGING TEACHERS COMMONLY are the primary health care resource for voice students. In addition to questions about technique, students often turn to teachers for guidance regarding issues of vocal health. While singing teachers should be very cautious about providing specific guidance without the input of a physician, the greater the teacher's knowledge base, the more likely he/she is to be able to counsel students accurately. Vocal health problems run the gamut from common colds to cancer, and many students have particular concerns about potential environmental hazards that may affect vocal health. One such hazard is asbestos exposure, which is associated clearly with serious lung disease. However, the association with laryngeal cancer is less clear. This article is derived from a prior publication (with permission) and is provided to bring singing teachers up-to-date on what we know about this important problem.1Medicine is replete with assumptions and myths based on faulty reasoning. It is important for all of us to be aware of this problem and diligent about assessing evidence to draw the best possible conclusions. One of the most frequent errors results from post hoc ergo propter hoc reasoning. This classic error in logic assumes that because Event B happens after Event A, Event B is caused by Event A. Proof of causation requires considerably more rigorous evidence. The suggestion that asbestos exposure can cause laryngeal cancer appears to be an example of this flaw in logic.It was estimated in 2008 that in the United States, laryngeal carcinoma would affect 12,250 adults, of whom 3,670 would die. The mean age of diagnosis of laryngeal carcinoma is 65 years, and the mean age of death caused by this tumor is 69 years.2 Known risk factors for laryngeal carcinoma include cigarette smoking and ethanol use. These factors have been shown to have a synergistic effect in the development of carcinoma, and singers and professional voice users should be educated early in their careers to not smoke and to moderate alcohol consumption.In the late 1970s, medical evidence determined a connection between asbestos exposure and mesothelioma, a very aggressive lung cancer. The manufacturing of building materials containing asbestos was stopped. In 1989, the United States EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) banned all new uses of asbestos; uses developed before 1989, however, were still allowed. In 2005, Senators Harry Reid and Bill Frist established a National Asbestos Awareness Day to raise public awareness of the dangers of asbestos exposure.3Asbestos is the name of a group of six naturally occurring minerals which contain long thin fibers that can be easily separated. These fibers are resistant to heat, fire, and chemicals, and they do not conduct electricity. Because asbestos is flame resistant and has excellent insulation properties, it was used extensively in building materials such as ceiling tiles, ductwork for heating and cooling systems, vinyl floor coverings, and others. Asbestos has also been used in the automobile industry, in particular in brake pads and linings and clutches. However, asbestos is usually encountered through occupational exposure including construction work, shipyards, mining, oil refineries, processing plants, chemical and power plants. Firefighters and auto mechanics may also have occupational exposure to asbestos.A possible association between asbestos exposure and laryngeal carcinoma has been evaluated throughout the years. However, there are numerous conflicting reports, and a link between asbestos and laryngeal cancer has not been proven.In 1975, Stell and McGill were the first authors to propose a link between asbestos exposure and laryngeal carcinoma.4 One hundred nineteen patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx were identified. Compared to age-matched controls, a greater proportion of patients had significant asbestos exposure (27.7 vs. 2.5%; p

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Autre devis · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,774
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,444

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,294
Écart entre enseignants0,271 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle