MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W41690180

Why Can’t I Pay Attention?

2007· article· en· W41690180 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wade Junek

Notice bibliographique

RevuePubMed Central · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueInfant Development and Preterm Care
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPerspective (graphical)LiteracyService (business)PsychologyOrder (exchange)CognitionComputer sciencePedagogyPsychiatry
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Self-help books and books about every disorder or problem in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual are now a mainline category on the bookshelves of Canada’s bookstores, are found in hospital libraries for families and are used by clinicians in various forms of public and private practice. Some of us probably have our favorites in various categories, and others we may wish to be aware of because our patient’s families may be using them. These six books are intended for children, or for their parents to review with them, and cover problem areas generally noted in the titles (David’s Secret is nocturnal enuresis). Books for children should be expected to accomplish some specific goals: written at an appropriate literacy level, convey relevant information and have inherent interest. Literacy levels vary greatly among children of the same age, between children at six versus those at 12 and, given the problems written about, have additional variation related to the severity of the problem and the presence or absence of various cognitive difficulties. We have used some of these books in our day treatment service and have the others available, when appropriate. In order to maintain interest, all books are written from the perspective of the child, which tends to provide a description of one version of the problem which, as we know, can be multi-faceted. The authors attempt to broaden this in various ways with the books, some more successfully than others. This needs to be kept in mind for any clinician and parent in using one of these books. “Why I Can’t Pay Attention?” was written by a pediatrician at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto with support credits to Dr. Paul Steinhauer, Dr. Mary Seeman and Dr. Stanley Freeman. Dr. Shawn could never find quite the right book for the children he saw and solved the problem by writing his own. This is a very readable book even for children by grade 3 and easily understood by those who are younger. It has a number of virtues: at 22 pages, it is brief, there is a multi-cultural element apparent in names and illustrations, it gives the full range of presentations of attentional disorders and co-morbidities, and it presents a multi-modal treatment outline. All this is still kept in the simple language and context of a family such that both children and parents benefit from it. Special mention needs to be made about the numerous excellent colour illustrations that allowed the words on a page to come to life in ways easily identifiable by children. The story line is written from the point of view of the child and started with early child development and the typical problems in school, then shifted to diagnosis and management. The use of a summer camp allowed the author to present the full variety of children and give strong messages about strengths, acceptance and the importance of the universally satisfying discovery that the person can be understood and is not alone. The ten main points for parents were well summarized at the back of the book. As a public service document the price is right and our staff has used it with children and families with good success.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,210
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,293

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,231
Écart entre enseignants0,219 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePubMed CentralMême sujetInfant Development and Preterm CareTravaux en français237 207