MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4200042406 · doi:10.1093/jjco/hyab199

Age-specific incidence rate of leukaemia in the world

2021· article· en· W4200042406 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ryoko Machii, Kumiko Saika

Notice bibliographique

RevueJapanese Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineIncidence (geometry)ChinaDemographyCancer registryCancerCancer incidenceDeveloped countryEnvironmental healthGeographyPopulationInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In order to make a comparison of the age-specific incidence rate of leukaemia between Japan and other countries, we abstracted cancer incidence rate from the Cancer Incidence in Five Continents Vol. XI (CI5) (1). The International Agency for Research on Cancer provides the CI5 databases on the incidence of cancer recorded by cancer registries (regional and national) worldwide. We used cancer incidence rate in five countries in Asia (China, India, Japan, Republic of Korea and Thailand), three countries in America (the USA, Canada and Brazil), two countries in Oceania (Australia and New Zealand) and four countries in Europe (the UK, France, Germany and Italy). Some countries have plural cancer registries and we aggregated all the registries to calculate the incidence rate in the countries from the CI5-XI database. The period of years at cancer diagnosis was from 2008 to 2012. In this study, leukaemia included lymphoid leukaemia coded as C91, Myeloid leukaemia coded as C92-C94 and leukaemia unspecified coded as C95 based on ICD-10. Figure 1 shows the age-specific incidence rate of leukaemia in male by 5-year age groups for the selected countries. Age-specific incidence rate of leukaemia per 100,000 people in male. The pattern of the age-specific incidence curves was similar in the most countries, studied. The incidence rates decreased until 20–30 years of age, then increased with age. There is little difference between areas and countries up to about age 30, but it becomes greater at later age. In general, the incident rates were higher in America and Oceania (except Brazil) and European countries than those in Asia and Brazil, especially among over 45 years of age. In Asia, the incidence rates were highest in Japan, lowest in India and similar between the other three countries (China, the Republic of Korea and Thailand). The incidence rates for the oldest age group (85 years and older, 75 years and older only in India) were 48 (per 100 000 population) in Japan and 16 in India, and about 30 in the other three countries. Age-specific incidence rate of leukaemia per 100,000 people in female. The incidence rates for countries in America (except Brazil) and Oceania were similar with little difference. The rates in Brazil were similar to that of other American countries for those under 30 years of age, but the difference increases for those over 30 years of age. In Europe, the difference in incidence rate among four countries was relatively small. The UK had the highest incidence rate at 122 (per 100 000 population aged 85 and over), followed by France at 116, Germany at 106 and Italy at 97. Figure 2 shows the age-specific incidence rates of leukaemia in female. In most countries, the incidence rate for female was lower than for male at almost all ages, and the gender difference increased with age, especially after 45 years of age. In the age group, which has the highest incidence (75–79 or 80–84 years of age in many countries), the incidence rate of females was about half those of males. The trends of high or low incidence rates by age group in the countries of the Americas, Oceania and Europe were similar in male and female but were slightly different in Asia. For women, the Republic of Korea, but not Japan, had the highest incidence rates among those under 70 years of age. However, the incidence rates in the Republic of Korea peak in the 75–79 age group and then rapidly decreased, and in the 85 and older age group, the incidence rate is about the same as those in countries other than Japan in Asia. Note: Data were downloaded from the Global Cancer Observatory, which is an interactive web-based platform presenting global cancer statistics (https://gco.iarc.fr/). Responsibility for this presentation and interpretation lies with the authors of this article.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,009
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,384
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,997

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0090,011
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,129
Tête enseignante GPT0,467
Écart entre enseignants0,338 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJapanese Journal of Clinical OncologyMême sujetAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchTravaux en français237 207