Perceptions and reflections of early graduates of the first emergency medicine residency program in Ethiopia: A qualitative study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
INTRODUCTION: A bi-institutional partnership between physicians at Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia and the University of Toronto, Canada led the development and implementation of a novel emergency medicine (EM) postgraduate training program at Addis Ababa University (AAU). Subsequently, the first three cohorts of trainees were invited to participate in the evaluation of the curricular components devised and delivered by Toronto EM physicians as part of the Toronto Addis Ababa Academic Collaboration in EM (TAAAC-EM). We sought to characterise the strengths and weaknesses of the curriculum to improve it for future trainee cohorts. METHODS: This curriculum assessment used semi-structured, in-depth individual interviews to evaluate components of the TAAAC-EM program curriculum. Interviews were conducted with a purposive sampling of graduates from the first three cohorts of the TAAAC-EM program. RESULTS: Twelve participants were interviewed. The following themes were identified; The TAAAC-EM program built a novel EM culture at AAU and shifted teaching from didactic to learner-centered strategies where teachers serve as role models; The curriculum content of the EM resident program, including didactic and practical sessions, was well received by the graduates interviewed; Challenges identified included lack of continuity in training, and difficulties transitioning to practice in a locally nascent field; Participants evaluated the TAAAC-EM program model as very positive overall, and supported replicating the model by expanding within Ethiopia and beyond. CONCLUSIONS: The challenges identified in the program, including lack of continuity of clinical teaching and meeting the local educational resource needs of new graduates, helped inform program adaptations and improvements. TAAAC-EM, currently in its eleventh year, is now focused on transitioning full teaching responsibilities to local faculty and continuing to support a positive EM teaching culture. We believe that this thriving partnership can serve as a model for future north-south and south-south collaborations in postgraduate medical education.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».