Use of international experience in the system of selection of ukraine’s penitentiary personnel
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The peculiarities of candidates’ selection for work in the State Criminal and Executive Service of Ukraine are considered in the article. The statutory regulations that determine the requirements for applicants to serve in the SCES of Ukraine, among which the leading place is occupied by the Law of Ukraine “On the SCES of Ukraine” and the Law of Ukraine “On National Police” are analyzed. The advantages and disadvantages in the functioning of the domestic system of requirements for candidates for work in the SCES of Ukraine are revealed. Enough attention is paid to the Ukrainian and foreign approaches to the staffing of the Penitentiary System. The standard of requirements for candidates for employment in the Penitentiary System, enshrined in international legal acts, is analyzed, as well as the requirements for candidates for employment in such countries as Germany, Switzerland, Iceland, Austria, Canada and Denmark, which are not typical for the Ukrainian Penitentiary System, are considered and analyzed. In order to improve the current legislation governing the selection of persons to the SCES of Ukraine, the article provides a comparative analysis of the procedure for staffing foreign and Ukrainian penitentiary bodies and institutions, as well as the requirements for candidates for the SCES of Ukraine and foreign Penitentiary Systems. Due to this, promising approaches to improving the quality of staffing of the Penitentiary System of Ukraine are revealed and the feasibility of using foreign experience in recruiting for the penitentiary system of Ukraine is substantiated, as well as the changes to current legislation setting requirements for candidates for SCES of Ukraine are proposed. At the same time, it is emphasized that borrowing positive foreign experience of completing penitentiary positions requires amendments to the current legislation of Ukraine, as well as synchronization with the peculiarities of the Ukrainian Penitentiary System by creating a pilot project in order to actually test the results of world analysis, monitoring and tracking the changes, on the basis of which it will be possible to make further decisions. The expediency of creating a separate statutory regulation, the purpose of which is to regulate the procedure for passing the military medical commission exclusively by candidates for service in the SCES of Ukraine and junior enlisted as well as the command staff of the SCES of Ukraine, is substantiated. Key words: penitentiary system, personnel, vacant position, position requirements, selection system.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».