Education, Politics, and the Crisis of Democracy in the Age of Pandemics
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In the age of the pandemic, higher education is increasingly defined by modes of governance modeled after a business culture.As the pandemic continues to ravage countries across the globe, education has accelerated its emphasis on job training, online tools, and remote learning, while further aligning curricula with business interests (Alford and Kroll, 2020).With the move to online teaching, instrumental rationality and the language of technique have increasingly become the lingua franca of education.Remote teaching has moved to the forefront of discussions about pedagogy and in doing so has generated a preoccupation with methods and training skills, which not only displace serious concerns about the role of higher education as a public good but also placing unacceptable burdens on both teachers and students (School Magazine Editorial Action Toronto, 2021).Questions about improving delivery, tutorials, recorded lectures, contract grading, and how to give students bonus marks for uploading their notes have moved to the forefront of pedagogical consideration.Matters concerning regulating screen time replace crucial pedagogical issues about fostering deep engagement and critical thinking among students about crucial social issues.What disappears in diverse forms of pandemic pedagogy is what Pope Francis describes as the need for students to be attentive "to grave social injustices, violations of rights, terrible forms of poverty, and the waste of human lives.Moreover, he has advocated that educators "leave behind superficial approaches to education and the many short-cuts associated with utility, (standardized) test results, functionality and bureaucracy, which confuse education with instruction and end up atomizing our cultures" (Cummings McLean, 2020).In this instance, there is a call for pedagogical approaches that are transformative, empowering, and deeply examine what role education should play in furthering a democracy in a time of growing tyranny.Unfortunately, pandemic pedagogy is neither on the side of expanding civic culture, social justice, or democracy.For instance, teaching and learning centers in many universities now dominate educational issues, largely concerned with providing training sessions on how to use a variety of teaching methods and platforms that extend from teaching Zoom classes to exploring the diverse vagaries of videoconferencing (Blum, 2020).As higher education succumbs to a business culture and cult of efficiency, it removes itself from issues regarding the complex relationships among knowledge, power, and the acquisition of agency.Matters of purpose and meaning become fetishized within a discourse of hyper instrumental reason that serves to hermetically situate faculty and students within a fetishized discourse of efficiency.What is lost here is the pedagogical imperative of teaching students to be thoughtful, informed, and engaged critical citizens.There is little talk about how education should be a place where students realize themselves as citizens or, for that matter, the role of faculty as public intellectuals who connect their work to crucial social problems while addressing pedagogy as a moral and political project.The COVID-19 pandemic has further intensified the corporatization of the neoliberal university.This is evident in the increasing control of universities by managerial elites, the loss of power by faculty in shaping governance and the mission of higher education, along with a loss of control over their own conditions of labor.As Watermeyer and his co-authors (2021, p. 654) observed:
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,011 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,013 | 0,035 |
| Communication savante | 0,014 | 0,016 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,008 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,011 | 0,019 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».