On Inventing <scp>Cross‐Dehydrogenative</scp> Coupling (<scp>CDC</scp>): Forming C—C Bond from Two Different C—H Bonds
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Comprehensive Summary Constructing C—C bonds is central to the synthesis of all chemical products. While conventional C—C bond formation methods always require one or two functional groups, 20 years ago, our establishment of the concept of Cross‐Dehydrogenative Coupling (CDC), wherein C—C bonds are directly formed from two different C—H bonds via the “formal” removal of two H atoms, has revolutionized chemical synthesis and has become one of the most active research subjects in chemistry. This perspective article will provide an insight of the origin of this concept and its early development in our laboratory. What are your favorite scientific discoveries from your lab? Over the past 30 years, we have made many discoveries. The most important ones are the developments of various Grignard‐type reactions in water which contradict textbook knowledge, the Aldehyde‐Alkyne‐Amine (A 3 ) coupling, the Cross‐Dehydrogenative Coupling that forms C—C bond from two C—H bonds, and the umpolung of carbonyl as organometallic reagent surrogate that allows to carry out organometallic reactions without using stoichiometric organometallic reagents. Did you plan to be a chemist when you were young? Not really. I was planning to be an artist when I was young but really felt deep affection for chemistry after I entered college. How did you get into Green Chemistry? When I was a graduate student, I became fascinated about natural product synthesis. However, I felt that most reported total syntheses are very lengthy and difficult. As a result, I have been constantly asking myself: can we have novel chemistry to simplify organic syntheses? By coincidence, this was also during the dawn of Green Chemistry, which has the same philosophy. Besides chemistry, what are your hobbies? Besides chemistry research, I still have an eye on art. Also, I enjoy reading philosophy books, traveling and meeting people from different walks of life. What advice do you give to young academics? Be unique, creative and different from others. These might be difficult to do at the beginning but they will be beneficial in the long run. In your personal view, what are the important future developments for chemistry? As chemistry is the central science, important future developments will mostly arise from interdisciplinary areas. These are already occurring between biology and chemistry, environment and chemistry, materials and chemistry, energy and chemistry, but will also be between chemistry and some emerging fields. One of them is with artificial intelligence. Currently, it requires a great amount of time and effort to carry out a large number of experiments for most reactions, Artificial intelligence can greatly change and simplify future chemistry research.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,010 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».