630 Impact of right ventricular dysfunction after mitraclip treatment as a bridge to heart transplantation: insight from the mitrabridge strategy
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Aims MitraClip treatment has been recently proposed as a ‘bridge strategy’ solution for advanced heart failure (HF) patients with significant functional mitral regurgitation (MR), who are potential candidates or are waiting for cardiac replacement therapy (LVAD or heart transplantation, HTx). In this clinical scenario, left-ventricular-related right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) represents an important prognostic factor. Our study aimed to investigate the possible prognostic implication of RVD in advanced HF patients treated with MitraClip as a bridge to HTx strategy. Methods and results RVD was assessed using the relationship between tricuspid annular peak systolic excursion (TAPSE) and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP). All patients from the MitraBridge registry for whom these two echocardiographic parameters were available, were included in the study. A cut-off value of TAPSE/PASP ratio < 0.36 was used to defined RVD, as previously reported. The primary outcome was a composite Endpoint of all-cause death or rehospitalization for HF at 2-year. For patients who underwent LVAD implantation or HTx, follow-up data were censored at the time of those events. A total of 80 patients were included in the study. The median TAPSE/PASP ratio was 0.35 (25th–75th: 0.27–0.46), with 43 (54%) patients having a TAPSE/PASP ratio < 0.36 (RVD group). The latter had a prevalent MR ischaemic etiology (49% vs. 38%), with a more frequent history of percutaneous coronary intervention (46.5% vs. 22%, P = 0.02). Except for TAPSE (15.7 ± 3.6 mm vs. 19.2 ± 3.7 mm, P = 0.001) and PASP (61 ± 14 mmHg vs. 39.5 ± 9.5 mmHg, P < 0.001), the other echocardiographic characteristics were similar between the two study groups (overall mean left ventricular ejection fraction 26.9 ± 8%, median left ventricular end-diastolic volume index 120.7, 25th–75th: 102.2–146.5 ml/m2). After a median follow-up time of 508 (25th–75th: 160–899) days, elective HTx occurred in 12 patients (7 from the RVD group), while LVAD implantation was performed in 13 patients (7 from the RVD group). The primary outcome occurred in 30 patients (38%) with a 2-year Kaplan–Meier estimate of freedom from the composite endpoint of 41%. At univariate (HR: 1.3; 95% CI: 0.6–2.8, P = 0.451) and multivariate (HR: 1.6; CI: 0.7–3.8, P = 0.249) Cox-regression analysis, TAPSE/PASP ratio < 0.36 was not identified as an independent predictor of primary outcome. Indeed, at follow-up echocardiographic control (median time 252, 25th–75th: 122–365 days), a significant improvement in TAPSE/PASP ratio was observed in the RVD group (baseline median TAPSE/PASP ratio 0.27, 25th–75th: 0.22–0.32 vs. follow-up median TAPSE/PASP ratio 0.37, 25th–75th: 0.28–0.47, P < 0.001). Conclusions In advanced HF patients with functional MR, MitraClip treatment could prevent or ameliorate left-ventricular-related RVD, allowing safe access to HTx or LVAD.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».