315 Cardiac surgery in the elderly: the underestimate role of frailty in the decision making
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Aims Elders represent the most common population with indication to cardiac surgery, also presenting the highest mortality/disability after interventions. Both for valve and coronary artery surgery the estimation of the surgical risk, including the frailty assessment, is recommended to guide the decision making. However, frailty results not exhaustively assessed by the commonly used surgical risk scores such as EuroSCORE I-II and score of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and is mostly used the Kat’s Index (included in the latest European guidelines). This study aims at establishing the feasibility and the value of a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) in elderly undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods From June 2021we consecutively enrolled 50 elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery (age > 65 years old). All patients underwent CGA with an expert geriatrician and the demographic, biometrics, clinical and echocardiographic data were collected. We evaluated frailty and disability (Kats index, Barthel Index and Frailty Index FI), cognitive status (Montreal Cognitive Assessment MOCA, Mini Mental State Examination MMSE and Geriatric Depression Scale), physical status (Tinetti test, Short Performance Physical Battery SPPB, Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly PASE and 6-min Walking test), delirium condition, sarcopenia and nutritional status (Mini-Nutritional Assessment MNA). A clinical, echocardiographic, and geriatric 3-month follow-up is planned. In particular, we are evaluating the impact of frailty, assessed by CGA, on peri-surgical outcome and the potential additive value of a CGA on the commonly used surgical risk-scores and Kat’s Index. Furthermore, we are assessing the impact of cardiac surgery of frail elderly at GCA. Results The CGA was feasible in all patients and lasted 1 h/patient. In our baseline data, only 23% of the enrolled patients resulted ‘frail’ according to Kat’s Index. However, in the remaining 77% of the study population, the CGA have identified 30% of patients with increased frailty index and 30% with disability, assessed by Barthel Index and physical function indexes (PASE and SPPB). In these patient, frailty and disability were associated to impaired nutritional status, assessed at MNA. Furthermore, 40% of the patients of this group resulted sarcopenic at the hand grip test. The cognitive valuation has shown a cognitive impairment in the 20% of patients at the MMSE and the 70 % at the MOCA. Of note, the 40% of the patients resulted to suffer of depression, not diagnosed before the GCA. At mid-November 2021 the follow-up will be completed. Conclusions The preliminary results of the presents study suggest that in patients undergoing cardiac surgery frailty is currently underdiagnosed. The follow-up analysis will establish if a CGA has an additive value on common surgical risk estimators. This study has a potential impact on the risk stratification of elderly patients undergoing invasive procedures and defines the need of a geriatrician in the heart team.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».