MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4200489605 · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2021.12.009

Role of the serotonergic system in subcallosal DBS for treatment-resistant depression

2021· letter· en· W4200489605 sur OpenAlexafffundabout
Amirhossein Ghaderi, Elliot C. Brown, Darren Clark, Rajamannar Ramasubbu, Zelma H. T. Kiss, Andrea B. Protzner

Notice bibliographique

RevueBrain stimulation · 2021
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueNeurological disorders and treatments
Établissements canadiensOntario Brain InstituteUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesUniversity of Calgary
Mots-clésContext (archaeology)Deep brain stimulationTreatment-resistant depressionAnterior cingulate cortexPsychologyNeurosciencePsychiatryMedicineInternal medicineMajor depressive disorderBiologyCognition

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has shown promising therapeutic results for treatment resistant depression (TRD). The subcallosal cingulate gyrus (SCG), having extensive connections to limbic and cortical areas, is a common target [[1]Hamani C. Mayberg H. Stone S. Laxton A. Haber S. Lozano A.M. The subcallosal cingulate gyrus in the context of major depression.Biol Psychiatr. 2011; 69: 301-308Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (303) Google Scholar,[2]Ramasubbu R. Clark D.L. Golding S. Dobson K.S. Mackie A. Haffenden A. et al.Long versus short pulse width subcallosal cingulate stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a randomised, double-blind, crossover trial.Lancet Psychiatr. 2020; 7 ([Internet]) (Available from:): 29-40https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215036619304158Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (23) Google Scholar]. Yet, blinded trials indicate that SCG-DBS outcomes depend on individual factors [[3]Holtzheimer P.E. Husain M.M. Lisanby S.H. Taylor S.F. Whitworth L.A. McClintock S. et al.Subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a multisite, randomised, sham-controlled trial.Lancet Psychiatr. 2017; 4: 839-849Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (220) Google Scholar]. Reasons for this variable effectiveness may involve underlying biomarkers related to mechanisms of action. For example, work using animal models suggests that SCG-DBS in TRD may have similar mechanisms of action as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants [[1]Hamani C. Mayberg H. Stone S. Laxton A. Haber S. Lozano A.M. The subcallosal cingulate gyrus in the context of major depression.Biol Psychiatr. 2011; 69: 301-308Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (303) Google Scholar,[4]Hamani C. Diwan M. Macedo C.E. Brandão M.L. Shumake J. Gonzalez-Lima F. et al.Antidepressant-like effects of medial prefrontal cortex deep brain stimulation in rats.Biol Psychiatr. 2010; 67 ([Internet]) (Available from:): 117-124https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006322309010336Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (256) Google Scholar]. Stimulation of SCG homologous regions in rodents significantly increased release of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) in anatomically connected areas and 5-HT depletion eliminated benefits of DBS in the model [[4]Hamani C. Diwan M. Macedo C.E. Brandão M.L. Shumake J. Gonzalez-Lima F. et al.Antidepressant-like effects of medial prefrontal cortex deep brain stimulation in rats.Biol Psychiatr. 2010; 67 ([Internet]) (Available from:): 117-124https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006322309010336Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (256) Google Scholar]. If this is similar in humans, then baseline 5-HT level in TRD patients and changes in 5-HT level during stimulation may be a biomarker of treatment outcome for SCG-DBS. We investigated the predictive and therapeutic role of the serotonergic system in SCG-DBS outcomes for TRD patients using the loudness dependence of auditory evoked potentials (LDAEP). The LDAEP is an index of global serotonergic activity and a non-invasive measure of in vivo serotonin in animals and humans [[5]Gallinat J. Bottlender R. Juckel G. Munke-Puchner A. Stotz G. Kuss H.-J. et al.The loudness dependency of the auditory evoked N1/P2-component as a predictor of the acute SSRI response in depression.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2000; 148 ([Internet]) (Available from:): 404-411https://doi.org/10.1007/s002130050070Crossref PubMed Scopus (164) Google Scholar]. It is a component of the evoked response to increases in stimulus intensity as measured by change in amplitude of N1/P2, and is inversely related to central serotonergic activity, with a high LDAEP reflecting weak serotonergic neurotransmission and vice versa [[6]Mulert C. Juckel G. Augustin H. Hegerl U. Comparison between the analysis of the loudness dependency of the auditory N1/P2 component with LORETA and dipole source analysis in the prediction of treatment response to the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor citalopram in major depression.Clin Neurophysiol. 2002; 113 ([Internet]) (Available from:): 1566-1572https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245702002523Crossref PubMed Scopus (68) Google Scholar]. In animal studies, microinjection into the dorsal raphe nucleus or systemic administration of a serotonin agonist or antagonist led to a decrease or increase, respectively, in the intensity dependence of the auditory evoked potential. Previous studies showed that this can be used as a predictor of response to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for patients with major depressive disorder [[7]Park Y.-M. Lee S.-H. Kim S. Bae S.-M. The loudness dependence of the auditory evoked potential (LDAEP) in schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and healthy controls.Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2010; 34 ([Internet]) (Available from:): 313-316https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278584609004151Crossref PubMed Scopus (58) Google Scholar]. Twelve individuals who received DBS for TRD participated in baseline preoperative EEG recording, with six completing a 6-month EEG session, and seven completing a 12-month EEG session (Supplementary Table 1). Detailed description of participants is reported in our clinical trial2. EEG was recorded using a Brain Vision antiCHamp device (Brain Products GmbH, Gilching, Germany) and a 64-channel (Cz reference) EasyCap with 10/20 electrode montage. Participants were sitting on a comfortable chair and electrode impedances were kept under 17 kΩ. For the LDAEP paradigm, auditory stimuli were presented binaurally through headphones during EEG recording. Pure tones (1000 Hz, 30 ms duration, 10 ms rise/fall time and ISI jittered from 1200 to 1800 ms) of five different intensities (60, 70, 80, 90, and 100 dB SPL; 100 stimuli per intensity) were presented pseudo-randomly [[7]Park Y.-M. Lee S.-H. Kim S. Bae S.-M. The loudness dependence of the auditory evoked potential (LDAEP) in schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and healthy controls.Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2010; 34 ([Internet]) (Available from:): 313-316https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278584609004151Crossref PubMed Scopus (58) Google Scholar]. Data were analyzed offline using ERPLab (https://erpinfo.org/erplab). Signals were bandpass filtered at 0.1–30Hz. Independent component analysis (fastICA, https://erpinfo.org/erplab) was used to remove eyeblink and eye movement artifacts. Data were segmented into 100–500 ms epochs. Epochs were excluded if they exceeded a peak-to-peak threshold±75μV in a moving window of 200 ms. FCz was selected for analyses as the central midline point shows maximal amplitude for N1/P2 components of the LDAEP [[5]Gallinat J. Bottlender R. Juckel G. Munke-Puchner A. Stotz G. Kuss H.-J. et al.The loudness dependency of the auditory evoked N1/P2-component as a predictor of the acute SSRI response in depression.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2000; 148 ([Internet]) (Available from:): 404-411https://doi.org/10.1007/s002130050070Crossref PubMed Scopus (164) Google Scholar,[7]Park Y.-M. Lee S.-H. Kim S. Bae S.-M. The loudness dependence of the auditory evoked potential (LDAEP) in schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and healthy controls.Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2010; 34 ([Internet]) (Available from:): 313-316https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278584609004151Crossref PubMed Scopus (58) Google Scholar]. For the N1, we extracted the amplitude of the most negative peak between 50 and 150 ms, and for P2, the most positive peak between 150 and 250 ms. Then, we calculated the peak-to-peak N1/P2 amplitudes for five different intensities (i.e., 60-, 70-, 80-, 90-, and 100-dB SPL) and LDAEP slopes were achieved as the slope of linear regression fit among them [[5]Gallinat J. Bottlender R. Juckel G. Munke-Puchner A. Stotz G. Kuss H.-J. et al.The loudness dependency of the auditory evoked N1/P2-component as a predictor of the acute SSRI response in depression.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2000; 148 ([Internet]) (Available from:): 404-411https://doi.org/10.1007/s002130050070Crossref PubMed Scopus (164) Google Scholar,[7]Park Y.-M. Lee S.-H. Kim S. Bae S.-M. The loudness dependence of the auditory evoked potential (LDAEP) in schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and healthy controls.Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2010; 34 ([Internet]) (Available from:): 313-316https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278584609004151Crossref PubMed Scopus (58) Google Scholar]. To test our hypothesis that the LDAEP slope at baseline could predict treatment outcome, we performed a correlation analysis between LDAEP slopes at baseline and 6- and 12-month percentage change in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17 (HRSD) scores. Then, we compared the N1/P2 LDAEP component in remitters (defined as those achieving HRSD<7) and non-remitters using a non-parametric permutation t-test [[8]Maris E. Oostenveld R. Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data.J Neurosci Methods. 2007; 164: 177-190Crossref PubMed Scopus (3764) Google Scholar] with 10000 random shuffles, an appropriate approach to evaluate differences between groups with small sample size. We also performed a correlation analysis between the percentage change in HRSD and LDAEP slopes at 6- and 12-months. Correlation analysis for N1/P2 LDAEP (Fig. 1-A) showed significant negative relationships between the LDAEP slope at baseline, and baseline to 6-month percent change in HRSD (r = −0.625, p = 0.030) (Fig. 1-A1), and between baseline LDAEP slope, and baseline to 12-month percent change in HRSD (r = −0.704, p = 0.011) (Fig. 1-A2). A shallower LDAEP slope was associated with greater clinical response to DBS. The permutation t-test showed that non-remitters at 12-months exhibited a significantly steeper LDAEP at baseline compared to remitters (t(2,10) = -2.1055, p = 0.048) (Fig. 1-B). At 12-months, significant correlation between changes in HRDS and LDAEP slope was observed (r = −0.927, p = 0.003) (Fig. 1-C2) but no correlation was seen at 6-months (Fig. 1-C1). Moreover, one participant (7024) with the highest LDAEP slope at baseline together with another showing greatest change in slope over time (7027) exhibited the worst result with DBS (Fig. 1-C). These preliminary results suggest that LDAEP can be used as a biomarker to predict SCG-DBS outcome in TRD patients and confirms our hypothesis that individual differences in central 5-HT activity is correlated with DBS outcomes. Participants who exhibited shallower LDAEP at baseline showed better response to DBS and continuing shallow LDAEP slope over time correlated with reduction in depression scores. Since central 5-HT activity is correlated with shallowness of the LDAEP slope, it suggests that TRD patients with relatively higher baseline 5-HT activity were likely to improve with SCG-DBS. Additionally, our findings are consistent with animal studies, confirming a role for serotonergic neurotransmission in the therapeutic mechanism of SCG-DBS clinical outcome [[1]Hamani C. Mayberg H. Stone S. Laxton A. Haber S. Lozano A.M. The subcallosal cingulate gyrus in the context of major depression.Biol Psychiatr. 2011; 69: 301-308Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (303) Google Scholar,[4]Hamani C. Diwan M. Macedo C.E. Brandão M.L. Shumake J. Gonzalez-Lima F. et al.Antidepressant-like effects of medial prefrontal cortex deep brain stimulation in rats.Biol Psychiatr. 2010; 67 ([Internet]) (Available from:): 117-124https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006322309010336Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (256) Google Scholar]. Interestingly, our results on prediction are contrary to studies where responders to SSRIs had steep LDAEP at baseline, meaning lower central 5-HT activity [[5]Gallinat J. Bottlender R. Juckel G. Munke-Puchner A. Stotz G. Kuss H.-J. et al.The loudness dependency of the auditory evoked N1/P2-component as a predictor of the acute SSRI response in depression.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2000; 148 ([Internet]) (Available from:): 404-411https://doi.org/10.1007/s002130050070Crossref PubMed Scopus (164) Google Scholar,[6]Mulert C. Juckel G. Augustin H. Hegerl U. Comparison between the analysis of the loudness dependency of the auditory N1/P2 component with LORETA and dipole source analysis in the prediction of treatment response to the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor citalopram in major depression.Clin Neurophysiol. 2002; 113 ([Internet]) (Available from:): 1566-1572https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245702002523Crossref PubMed Scopus (68) Google Scholar]. These discrepant findings may relate to different patient populations (TRD vs. major depression) and neurochemical mechanisms of DBS and SSRIs on 5-HT release or reuptake. DBS patients were exposed and concurrently treated with multiple antidepressants. Although both DBS and SSRIs significantly increase 5-HT release, they may induce different alterations in 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptor expression [[9]Volle J. Bregman T. Scott B. Diwan M. Raymond R. Fletcher P.J. et al.Deep brain stimulation and fluoxetine exert different long-term changes in the serotonergic system.Neuropharmacology. 2018; 135 ([Internet]) (Available from:): 63-72https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028390818301060Crossref PubMed Scopus (17) Google Scholar]. Furthermore, while SSRIs increased expression of serotonin transporter (SERT), brief DBS reduced SERT [[9]Volle J. Bregman T. Scott B. Diwan M. Raymond R. Fletcher P.J. et al.Deep brain stimulation and fluoxetine exert different long-term changes in the serotonergic system.Neuropharmacology. 2018; 135 ([Internet]) (Available from:): 63-72https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028390818301060Crossref PubMed Scopus (17) Google Scholar] expression. Beyond these opposite effects of DBS and SSRIs on SERT, DBS may change ionic currents and presynaptic physiology to cause more complex synaptic alterations compared to SSRIs [[10]Luo F. Kiss Z.H.T. Cholinergics contribute to the cellular mechanisms of deep brain stimulation applied in rat infralimbic cortex but not white matter.Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2021; 45 ([Internet]) (Available from:): 52-58https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924977X21001553Crossref PubMed Scopus (1) Google Scholar]. There are no comparable studies of long-term DBS effects on 5-HT in humans; therefore, we can only speculate that the considerable increase of LDAEP slope (decrease of 5-HT activity) over time in two participants with worst outcomes may be related to complex synaptic alterations of SCG-DBS. Overall, despite small number of patients, our results suggest that EEG (an accessible, non-invasive and inexpensive technology) could predict SCG-DBS outcomes. This approach can easily be tested in future studies with larger sample sizes. ECB designed the study with input from DLC, ABP, ZHTK and RR. ECB and DLC performed the data collection. AG and ECB analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. RR did the clinical assessments. AG made the figures and tables. All authors interpreted the data, reviewed the final manuscript, and provided comments. The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Fundings provided by Alberta Innovates Health Solutions (AIHS) and Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) have been received by Dr. Kiss ( 04126-2017 ) and Dr. Protzner ( 05299-2020 ). Dr. Kiss was an AIHS clinical scholar; Drs. Brown and Clark were both post-doctoral fellows with AIHS and received additional funding from NSERC-CREATE and the Mathison Centre . Dr. Ghaderi was funded by an Eyes High Postdoctoral Award from the University of Calgary . Dr. Ramasubbu has received honorarium for serving in the advisory committee of Astra Zeneca, Lundbeck, Janssen, and Otsuka. He also received an investigator-initiated grant from Astra Zeneca and Pfizer. These data were presented as a poster at the 74th Society of Biological Psychiatry annual meeting in May 2019. All authors report no potential conflicts of interest. The following is the Supplementary data to this article: Download .docx (.01 MB) Help with docx files Multimedia component 1

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,187
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,512

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,276
Écart entre enseignants0,253 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations6
Publié2021
Routes d'admission3
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBrain stimulationMême sujetNeurological disorders and treatmentsTravaux en français237 207