MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4200544851 · doi:10.36334/modsim.2021.f5.erechtchoukova

Application of topic modelling to Integrated Water Resource Assessment domain

2021· article· en· W4200544851 sur OpenAlex
Marina G. Erechtchoukova, Anvi Kohli

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueMODSIM2021, 24th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation. · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueSemantic Web and Ontologies
Établissements canadiensYork University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésComputer scienceResource (disambiguation)Domain (mathematical analysis)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Integrated Water Resource Assessment (IWRA) is a multidisciplinary analysis of cause-effect interactions of environmental, social, and economic processes which play an important role in an investigated scenario or undertaking related to a water resource. The goal of this analysis is to generate new knowledge in support of decision or policy making. The concept of IWRA covering natural processes in a water resource with at least one of the areas of economic or social aspects of modern society had been articulated almost a half a century ago. Nowadays, it became mature to the extent of supporting environmental sustainability and promoting UN Sustainable Development Goals through offering well-accepted approaches, frameworks, simulation models and computational techniques upholding the assessment. Nevertheless, there is steady interest to the issues of IWRA among researchers and practitioners because new technologies open opportunities for advanced computational techniques and comprehensive analysis. This study presents exploratory analysis of the corpus of scientific publications using text mining techniques with the aim to identify salient topics and potential gaps in the IWRA research area. The analysis was conducted based on the topic modelling approach. Topic modelling is a form of text mining that allows to find a representation of information from a collection of documents called corpus. Any text document can be viewed as a collection of several themes which are present in the document and reflect the document contents in a meaningful to its readers way. A theme or a topic is represented via an array of words that have a high tendency of co-occurrence when a particular theme underlying a document is being discussed. The most salient characteristic of topic models is that they automate the process of extracting these underlying (latent) themes in large corpora of texts without any human intervention excluding text pre-processing. Given that a topic model operates with a fixed vocabulary, domain specific analysis is expected to be more informative. Therefore, careful selection of documents included into a corpus is required. Application of topic modelling to multidisciplinary areas such as IWRA carries more importance because it helps to automate the process of extraction of salient topics relevant to a document and categorize the documents into themes for targeted analysis and knowledge extraction. The corpus of abstracts of 89726 papers published from 1970 to 2020 in peer-reviewed journals representing leading outlets in the areas of water resources and integrated environmental assessment was assembled. It was analysed using basic bibliometric statistics. After that, the corpus was pre-processed following conventional topic modelling framework and fed into LDA mallet algorithm to identify salient topics. Hyperparameters of the selected topic modelling algorithm were identified based on exploratory computations and evaluation of several topic models performance using a coherence score and qualitative evaluation of the identified topics. The model producing 20 topics was considered satisficing and used as a basis for the qualitative analysis of clusters of words forming topics. The analysis revealed two categories of latent topics presented in the corpus: methodological and environmental. The latter describes various aspects of utilization, protection, and restoration of a natural water resources. No theme reflecting assessment of socio-economic processes was uncovered despite the fact, that these processes play critical role in the environmental state of a water resource.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,718
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,553

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,033
Tête enseignante GPT0,301
Écart entre enseignants0,268 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle