Establishment and Development of Petro-Pavlivsky Monastery in the Village of Biksad in Transcarpatian Region in the 18th Century (According to the Documents of the State Archives of the Transcarpatian Region)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Based on the documents of the State Archives in Transcarpathian Region and studies, the article presents a review of the monastery activities in the village of Biksad in the 18th century. The aim of the publication is a substantive study of the monastery history and related events and processes; organizing the list of abbots and monks of the monastery; clarifi cation and specifi cation of settled facts and dates; analysis of discovered archival materials. The research methodology is based on general scientifi c methods: comparative, method of analysis and synthesis, as well as special, archival methods: retrospective, historical and method of criticism of sources. The methods used allowed to study the existing archival documents, to analyse and characterize the revealed documents, as well as to preserve the historical pluralism of opinions and make appropriate generalizations. Scientifi c novelty. The revealed materials showed that the existing thematic, scientifi c works are far from the status of exhaustive, and substantive works on this topic, which are based on the materials of the State Archives in Transcarpathian region, are practically absent. The processed archival documents signifi cantly supplement, correct the existing historical facts and clarify new aspects of the life of monastery. Some fi les of fonds are introduced into scientifi c circulation for the fi rst time. Prospects for further research is that further study of the monastery will signifi cantly fi ll existing gaps in the history of monasticism of Máramaros Eparchy. The development of the topic will allow to expand the permanent knowledge about: the inner life of the monasteries of Máramaros in specifi ed period, will allow to objectively study the church history in Transcarpathia in the 18th century on the whole. The conclusions present the results of the research providing generalizing characteristic of the revealed documents of the State Archives in Transcarpathian region, stating that the foundation of the monastery was permeated by its rejection in the location region. The tragic fate of the fi rst abbot of the monastery was connected with his personal life and the principles of mission he used; full-fl edged activity of the monastery begins at the equator of the 18th century. References: 1. Baán, I. (2017). Letters of Giovanni Giuseppe De Camillis, Greek Missionary and Bishop of Munkács (1689–1706). COLLECTANEA ATHANASIANA, II. Textus/Fontes (Vol. 13). Nyíregyháza. [in Hungarian; in Latin].2. Basilovits, J. (1799). Brevis Notitia Fundationis Theodori Koriathovits, Olim Ducis De Munkacs. Pro Religiosis Ruthenis Ordinis Sancti Basilii Magni, In Monte Csernek Ad Munkacs, Anno MCCCLX. Factae: Exhibens Seriem Episcoporum Graeco-Catholicorum Munkacsiensium, cum praecipuis eorundem aliorumque Illustrium Virorum Gestis, e variis Diplomatibus, Decretisque Regiis, ac aliis Documentis authenticis potissimum concinnatam. Pars Prima [A Short Notice of the Foundation of Theodore Koriathovits, Formerly the Grand Duke of Munkacs] (First Part). Ex Typographia Ellingeriana. [in Latin].3. Basilovits, J. (1799). Brevis Notitia Fundationis Theodori Koriathovits, Olim Ducis De Munkacs. Pro Religiosis Ruthenis Ordinis Sancti Basilii Magni, In Monte Csernek Ad Munkacs, Anno MCCCLX. Factae: Exhibens Seriem Episcoporum Graeco-Catholicorum Munkacsiensium, cum praecipuis eorundem aliorumque Illustrium Virorum Gestis, e variis Diplomatibus, Decretisque Regiis, ac aliis Documentis authenticis potissimum concinnatam. Pars Secunda [A Short Notice of the Foundation of Theodore Koriathovits, Formerly the Grand Duke of Munkacs] (Part Two). Ex Typographia Ellingeriana. [in Latin].4. Basilovits, J. (1799). Brevis Notitia Fundationis Theodori Koriathovits, Olim Ducis De Munkacs. Pro Religiosis Ruthenis Ordinis Sancti Basilii Magni, In Monte Csernek Ad Munkacs, Anno MCCCLX. Factae: Exhibens Seriem Episcoporum Graeco-Catholicorum Munkacsiensium, cum praecipuis eorundem aliorumque Illustrium Virorum Gestis, e variis Diplomatibus, Decretisque Regiis, ac aliis Documentis authenticis potissimum concinnatam. Pars Tertia [A Short Notice of the Foundation of Theodore Koriathovits, Formerly the Grand Duke of Munkacs] (Third Party). Ex Typographia Ellingeriana. [in Latin].5. Charnock, R. S. (1859). Local Etymology: A Derivative Dictionary of Geographical Names. London: Houlston and Wright. [in English].6. Ciubotă, V., Delegan, M., Ghitta, O. & Rus, V. (Eds.). (2007). Mukachivska Hreko-Katolytska ieparkhiia. Dokumenty [Mukachevo Greek Catholic Diocese. Documents] (Vol. I). Satu Mare– Uzhhorod. [in Ukrainian; in Latin; in Romanian].7. Ciubotă, V., Rus, V. & Bălu, D. (Eds.). (2012). Mukachivska Hreko-Katolytska ieparkhiia. Dokumenty [Mukachevo Greek Catholic Diocese. Documents] (Vol. II). Satu Mare. [in Ukrainian; in Latin; in Romanian].8. Ciubotă, V., Rus, V., Misiuk, M., Veskvarko, S. & Turuczkó, S. (Ed.). (2015). Mukachivska Hreko-Katolytska ieparkhiia. Dokumenty [Mukachevo Greek Catholic Diocese. Documents] (Vol. III). Satu Mare. [in Ukrainian; in Latin; in Romanian].9. Dulyshkovych, Y. (1877). Ystorycheskiia cherty Uhro-Russkykh [Historical features of the Ugro-Russians] (Tetrad III). Unhvar. [in Ukrainian; in Russian].10. Fenych, V. (2003). Mizh oktsydentalizmom ta oriientalizmom: ordo sancti basil ii magni ruthenorum v relihijnomu ta kulturnomu zhytti Mukachivskoi ieparkhii (do pochatku XX st.) [Between occidentalism and orientalism: ordo sancti basil ii magni ruthenorum in the religious and cultural life of the Mukachevo diocese (until the beginning of the 20th century)]. Carpatica-Karpatyka, 24, 87–140. [in Ukrainian].11. Fenych, V. (2019). Hreko-katolyky uzhhorodskoi uniinoi tradytsii [Greek Catholics of Uzhhorod union tradition]. Uzhhorod. [in Ukrainian].12. Hadzhega, V. (1922). Dodatky k istorii Rusynov y ruskykh tserkvei v Maramoroshi. Studii istorychno-arkhyvni [Additions to the history of the Rusyns and Russian churches in Maramures. Historical and archival studies] (Rochnyk I, pp. 140–228). In. Naukovyi Zbornyk tovarystva «Prosvita». Uzhhorod. [in Ukrainian; in Russian].13. Hodinka, A. (1911). A munkácsi görög szertartású püspökség okmánytára. I. KӦT. 1458–1715 [The archive of the Greek bishopric of Munkács. I. KӦT. 1458–1715] (Vol. LVI). Uzhhorod. [in Hungarian].14. Kichera V. (2008). Instytutsiina rozbudova provintsii chynu Vasylian na Zakarpatti u period pravlinnia Mukachivskoho yepyskopa Andriia Bachynskoho (1773–1809) [Institutional development of the Basilian order province in Transcarpathia during the reign of Bishop Andriy Bachynsky of Mukachevo (1773–1809)].). Rusyn, 3–4(13–14), 76–83. [in Ukrainian].15. Kichera, V. (2011). Deviantnist parafiialnoho dukhovenstva za schodennykom Josyfa de Kamelisa [Deviance of the parish clergy according to Joseph de Camelis’s diary]. Naukovyi visnyk UzhNU. Seriia: Istoriia, 27, 275–279. [in Ukrainian].16. Kichera, V. (2015). «Spysanie obytelei Maramoroshskykh» yak istorychne dzherelo [«Write-off of Maramures monasteries» as a historical source]. Rumunsko-Ukrainski vidnosyny. Istoriia ta suchasnist, 41–54. [in Ukrainian].17. Kinakh, H. (1926). Posischennie maramoroskykh monastyriv 1749 r. [Visiting the Maramures monasteries in 1749]. Zapysky ChSVV, II(1–2), 105–122. [in Ukrainian].18. Kinakh, H. (1930). Posischennia zakarpatskykh monastyriv ChSVV v rr. 1755, 1756, 1765, 1809 [Visiting the Transcarpathian monasteries of the Order of Saint Basil the Great in 1755, 1756, 1765, 1809]. Zapysky ChSVV, III(3–4), 432–446. [in Ukrainian].19. Kralickyi, A. (1869). Shematizm inokov China sv. Vasilіya Velikago, ugorskіya oblasti na god 1870 [The Order of St. Basil the Great monks’ shematism, Ugric region for the year 1870] (pp. 4–15). Unhvar. [in Ukrainian; in Russian].20. Kralickyi, A. (1871). Monastyr SS. AA. Petra i Pavla Biksadskіi [Monastery of the saint Peter and Pavel Biksadskiy] (p. 120). In Vremennik Stavropigіjskago Instituta na 1872 god. [in Ukrainian; in Russian].21. Luchkai, M. (2002). Istoriia karpatskykh rusyniv [The history of Carpathian Ruthenians] (6 vols.) (A. Ihnat, Trans., Vol. III). Uzhhorod: Zakarpattia. [in Ukrainian].22. Meteș, Ș. (1936). Mănăstirile româneşti din Transilvania şi Ungaria [Romanian monasteries in Transylvania and Hungary]. Sibiu. [in Romanian].23. Monych, O. (2009). Diialnist ostannoho Pravoslavnoho yepyskopa Dosyfeia (Feodorovycha) Uholskoho (1648–1733) [Activity of the last Orthodox bishop Dosifey (Feodorovich) Ugolsky (1648–1733)]. Rusyn, 1(15), 76–89. [in Ukrainian].24. Monych, O. (2018). Neskorena Pravda: narysy z istorii Krychivskoho monastyria [Unconquered Truth: essays on the history of the Krychiv Monastery]. Uzhhorod: Patent. [in Ukrainian].25. Monych, O. (2019). «Voloshskii razdor»: okremi aspekty istorii lokatsiinoho oporu unii v 2 polovyni XVIII stolittia [«Voloshsky discord»: some aspects of the history of the local resistance of the union in the second half of the 18th century]. Naukovi zapysky Bohoslovsko-istorychnoho naukovo-doslidnoho tsentru imeni arkhymandryta Vasyliia (Pronina), 6, 356–382. [in Ukrainian].26. Monych, O. (Comp.) (2021). Davni monastyri Mukachivskoi yeparkhii (1360–1800): zvedenyi predmetno-tematychnyi kataloh dokumentiv Derzhavnoho arkhivu Zakarpatskoi oblasti (Fond № 64, opysy № 1, 4, 5; Fond № 151, opysy № 1, 5, 6, 22, 25, Seriia «Dzherela z istorii Mukachivskoi yeparkhii») [Old monasteries of the Mukachevo diocese (1360–1800): Systematized subject-thematic catalog of documents of the State Archives of the Transcarpathian region. Fond № 64, descriptions 1, 4, 5; Fond № 151, descriptions № 1, 5, 6, 22, 25. Series «Sources on the history of the Mukachevo diocese»]. Uzhhorod: RIK-U. [in Ukrainian].27. Moroz, V. (2020). Istoriia chernetstva u spadschyni o. Anatoliia Kralytskoho, ChSVV [The history of monasticism in the legacy of Father Anatoliy Kralytsky’s legacy, the Order of Saint Basil the Great]. Naukovyi visnyk UzhNU. Seriia: Istoriia, 1(42), 20–29. [in Ukrainian].28. Pap, S. (2002). Istoriia Zakarpattia [The history of Transcarpathia] (Vol. II). Ivano-Frankivsk: Nova Zoria. [in Ukrainian].29. Pekar, A. V. (1982). Sproba istorii Rumunskoi provintsii Sv. Josyfa [An attempt at the history of the Romanian province of St. Joseph]. Zapysky ChSVV, ХІ(XVII)(1–4), 208–220. [in Ukrainian].30. Pekar, A. V. (1997). Narysy istorii Tserkvy Zakarpattia [Essays on the history of the Church of Transcarpathia]. In Zapysky ChSVV, vol. I: Yerarkhichne oformlennia (2nd ed.). Rym–Lviv: Misioner. [in Ukrainian].31. Pekar, A. V. (1997). Narysy istorii Tserkvy Zakarpattia [Essays on the history of the Church of Transcarpathia]. In Zapysky ChSVV, vol. II: Vnutrishnia istoriia (2nd ed.). Rym–Lviv: Misioner. [in Ukrainian].32. Pekar, A. V. (2014). Narysy istorii Tserkvy Zakarpattia [Essays on the history of the Church of Transcarpathia] (V. III). Uzhhorod: Uzhhorodska miska drukarnia. [in Ukrainian].33. Petrov, A. (1906). «Staraya vera» i unіya v XVII–XVIII vv. Poyasnitelnaya zapiska [Old Faith and Unia in the 17th – 18th centuries. Explanatory note by A. Petrov]. (Materіaly dlya istorіi Ugorskoj Rusi, Vol. II). SPb. [in Russian].34. Pronin, V. (2009). Istoriya Pravoslavnoi Tserkvi na Zakarpate. Kandidatskaya rabota arkhimandrita Vasiliya (Pronina) «Istoriya Mukachevskoi eparkhii (s drevneishikh vremen do Pervoi Mirovoi voiny 1914 goda)» [The history of the Orthodox Church in Transcarpathia. Archimandrite Vasily (Pronin)’s candidate work «History of the Mukachevo diocese (from ancient times to the First World War of 1914)»] (2nd ed.). Svyato-Nikolaevskii Mukachevskij monastyr, ORP «Φιλοκαλια». [in Russian].35. Szirmai Szirmay, A. (1809). Szathmár vármegye fekvése, törtnetei, és polgári esmérete [Location, history and civic size of Szathmár County] (Part 1). Budan. [in Hungarian].36. Vavryk, M. (1958). Po Vasyliianskykh monastyriakh [In the Basilian monasteries]. Toronto. [in Ukrainian].37. Zhatkovych, Yu. (1891). Epyskopy Maramoroshskye [Bishops of Maramorosh]. Lystok, 17, 196–197. [in Ukrainian; in Russian]. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.497017791238. Zhatkovych, Yu. (1891). Epyskopy Maramoroshskye [Bishops of Maramorosh]. Lystok, 22, 256–257. [in Ukrainian; in Russian].
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».