Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Dr Leila Srour and her husband, Bryan Watt, work with children in Laos, treating disease and supporting the development of Laotian pediatricians to reduce childhood morbidity and mortality and to improve the lives of Laotian children (FigureF1). Laotian children often suffer from multiple conditions, with infectious diseases—many of them preventable by vaccination—attacking children who already are malnourished and have parasitic infestations and vitamin deficiencies. Dr Srour has expressed her appreciation for the availability of the online version of Pediatrics in Review (PIR), which serves both as a source of information and as an educational resource. We are grateful for the work of colleagues such as Dr Srour and Bryan Watt and consider it a privilege to supply the online version of the journal free of charge to clinicians who work in developing countries.The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) is dedicated to the health and welfare of all children, which means that concern does not stop at any geographic borders but extends, literally, to all children. A few minutes spent perusing the AAP's Web site can yield information on a broad range of international efforts, many facilitated by the Office of International Affairs and the Section on International Child Health. PIR shares the same perspective, realizing that our contribution to the health of children should reach as far as possible. We have extended our influence in a number of ways.Our English language edition goes to subscribers in many countries, but many thousands of our colleagues can read our material in their own languages. Our most robust foreign language edition, in Spanish, goes to South and Central America, Mexico, and Spain. In addition, the journal is published in Chinese, Italian, Hungarian, and Polish. Next year, we expect material from PIR to be published in Turkish. All of the foreign language editions require the cooperation and hard work of individuals in each of those countries.Our Editorial Board includes representatives from the Canadian Paediatric Society and the European Academy of Paediatrics (formerly the Confederation of European Specialists in Paediatrics). We published an Italian commentary as an addendum to an article on the preparticipation sports physical examination that reported the experience in Italy with in-depth screening (Pediatr Rev. 2006;27:e75). We hope to include more clinical perspectives from other countries in the future.Although most of our authors are based in North America, we have received excellent contributions from other countries. Particularly gratifying has been the breadth of representation in our “Index of Suspicion” cases, which are submitted by readers. As of this issue, cases have been published by authors from Bangladesh, Canada, England, France, Germany, Greece, India, Iran, Israel, Italy, Malaysia, Norway, Portugal, Saudi Arabia, Spain, Taiwan, and Turkey. In addition, we have published cases from American military pediatricians based in Germany, Guam, and Japan.As a journal produced in the United States, the content of our English language edition reflects medical situations encountered in North America. However, most of what we print is applicable to children everywhere. We are sensitive to the fact that international travel has changed the spectrum of diseases that clinicians might encounter anywhere in the world, and our articles and case reports sometimes alert readers to unusual situations that they might encounter as a result of the shrinking world. At the same time, a focus on conditions that might be rare in North America can be helpful to clinicians working in countries where those disorders are encountered frequently.Similarly, we are aware of the need for cultural effectiveness because clinicians are more likely than ever to care for children from diverse backgrounds, some of which may be very unfamiliar. We have tried to incorporate this dimension into our articles when appropriate, and we have significant material on cultural effectiveness in preparation.We will continue to expand our perspective and share what we have to offer children around the world through their medical caretakers. In a very real sense, all of them are our children.—LFN
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,008 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,196 | 0,067 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».