MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4205350122 · doi:10.1353/phx.2016.0031

Masterpieces of Metonymy: From Ancient Greek Times to Now by Gregory Nagy

2016· article· en· W4205350122 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Matthew Clark

Notice bibliographique

RevuePhoenix · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueLinguistics and language evolution
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGossipRumorNothingWifePower (physics)HistoryLawLiteratureSociologyArtPhilosophyPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

BOOK REVIEWS/COMPTES RENDUS 407 identities. The author engages in an interesting discussion of several court cases cases where gossip may have played an important role. In the final section the author discusses whether fourth-century Athens was a catastrophically disrupted society, haunted by the trauma of the Peloponnesian war and the subsequent experience of tyranny. However, it must be noted that by the middle of the fourth century, when the cases Eidinow discusses went to trial, such memories would not have had the same affective power as they did in the first two decades of the century. Sometimes the reader is left wanting to know more, as for example on the role of gossip in the speech Against Euboulides, where it seems that the entire case against the citizenship of Euxitheos was based on nothing more than rumor. Likewise, one might want to hear more about the celebrity status of Phryne and how this could have evoked the poisonous phthonos which led to her prosecution. Some of the details of the court cases mentioned here contain small factual errors, as for example in the case against Neaira, where the prosecution was not one of graphe xenias but of purported marriage with a citizen, and Theogenes did not testify on the parentage of his wife. The document in 59.84 is undoubtedly a forgery, and I have argued elsewhere that he only testified on his divorce. I wish to note in particular that at 17, n. 24, Eidinow argues that the nominative of the name N”non is unknown and adopts the form Ninon (in the accusative), following the LGPN. However, the nominative of the name cannot be anything else except N”now (like the Assyrian city of Ninos, as in Str. 16.1.1, = N”now, Luc. Cont. 23.17 al.). It cannot be Nino (NinQ) because then the accusative would also be Nino, and it cannot have a neuter ending (= N”non), because feminine names with neuter endings are affectionate diminutives ending in -ion (e.g., Nannion, Aedonion), also rendered with neuter endings (-ium) in the Latin adaptations of Greek comedy (e.g., Astaphium, Adelphasium). This may seem like a small detail, but as Eidinow’s account of the trial of Ninos is the first significant discussion of this historical incident, I believe it is an important one. Eidinow has written an “exploratory and speculative” (266) study of envy, gossip, and social trauma in Athenian society, as well as a thought-provoking account of the reasons behind the prosecutions of the three women in question. She has laid out the pieces of the puzzle and directed her readers to consider a number of alluring possibilities. Students of classics, ancient history, and gender studies will find this volume an enjoyable journey through the messy public and private affairs of fourth-century Athens. University of Florida K. Kapparis Masterpieces of Metonymy: From Ancient Greek Times to Now. By Gregory Nagy. Washington, D.C.: Center for Hellenic Studies. 2015. Pp. xi, 284. Gregory Nagy is best known for his work on older Greek poets—particularly Homer, but also Theognis, Pindar, and others—and also for his work on Greek myth and hero cult. This book, however, concentrates on a rhetorical figure, metonymy, rather than an author or a genre, while developing ideas and interests present in Nagy’s earlier work. Metonymy, in a very rough definition, consists in substituting one term for another connected to it in some way. Metonymy is usually considered a trope, a figure which changes the meaning of a term; schemes, on the other hand, such as alliteration, leave 408 PHOENIX meaning alone. Metonymy is one of what Kenneth Burke calls the “four master tropes” (metaphor, metonymy, synecdoche, and irony);1 and according to Roman Jakobson, metonymy and metaphor are the two fundamental structures of language.2 There has been an abundance of theoretical and practical discussion of metaphor, but much less of metonymy, and Nagy’s study goes a long way towards filling that gap. The book is organized in a series of studies interrelated through thematic associations. The Introduction and Part One define the concept of metonymy. Part Two shows the...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,014
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,048

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,009
Communication savante0,0050,007
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0140,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,216
Écart entre enseignants0,201 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePhoenixMême sujetLinguistics and language evolutionTravaux en français237 207