MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4205398096 · doi:10.21009/jpud.151.03

Teaching Approach and Teacher Self-Efficacy during Early Childhood Distance Learning

2021· article· en· W4205398096 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pradita Permatasari Sibagariang, Weny Savitry S. Pandia

Notice bibliographique

RevueJPUD - Jurnal Pendidikan Usia Dini · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueEducational Methods and Impacts
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSelf-efficacyMathematics educationThematic analysisDescriptive statisticsPsychologyScale (ratio)Classroom managementPsychological interventionEarly childhood educationTeaching methodPedagogyQualitative researchMathematicsStatistics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Child Distance Learning (CDL) during the pandemic has led to an optimal development of children and effective teaching and learning processes in kindergartens. To overcome this, teachers need to apply a teaching approach in accordance with the principles of kindergarten education. In addition, teachers' self-efficacy of their ability to teach is also important for developing children's skills. This study aims to describe the teaching approach and the efficacy of kindergarten teachers during the CDL process and to identify the relationship between the two. The research method used is quantitative through document analysis as a source of data findings. A total of 116 Public Kindergarten (PK) teachers in DKI Jakarta participated in filling out the Classroom Management Scale and Teachers' Sense of Efficacy Scale online. All data were processed using descriptive statistics and correlation. Furthermore, there is a document analysis carried out on the Daily / Weekly Learning Program Design in PK Jakarta. The findings identified that the teaching approach of kindergarten teachers during CDL included only two principles of kindergarten education, namely thematic teaching and developing life skills. Furthermore, PK teachers in the Jakarta area showed low self-efficacy during CDL. The teaching approach and self-efficacy were caused by teachers' unpreparedness in facing challenges during CDL. In addition, other findings indicate that there is a relationship between teaching approaches and teacher self-efficacy. Another CDL model Interventions to increase teacher self-efficacy and the extent to which the relationship between the two variables can be studied further in future studies. Keywords: Early Childhood, Distance Learning, Teaching Approach, Teacher Self-Efficacy References: Agustin, M., & Wahyudin, U. (2011). Penilaian perkembangan anak usia dini. Refika Aditama. Agustin, M., Puspita, R. D., Nurinten, D., & Nafiqoh, H. (2020). Tipikal Kendala Guru PAUD dalam Mengajar pada Masa Pandemi Covid 19 dan Implikasinya. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 5(1), 334. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v5i1.598 Ayu, N. (2015). Pengelolaan Kurikulum 2013 Di Tk Negeri Pembina Semarang. Program Sarjana Universitas Negeri Semarang. Bullock, A., Coplan, R. J., & Bosacki, S. (2015). Exploring links between early childhood educators’ psychological characteristics and classroom management self-efficacy beliefs. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 47(2), 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038547 Cheung, S. K., Fong, R. W. tsz, Leung, S. K. Y., & Ling, E. K. wei. (2019). The Roles of Hong Kong Preservice Early Childhood Teachers’ Creativity and Zest in Their Self-efficacy in Creating Child-centered Learning Environments. Early Education and Development, 30(6), 788–799. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2019.1586224 Choi, J., Lee, J., & Kim, B. (2019). How does learner-centered education affect teacher self-efficacy? The case of project-based learning in Korea. Teaching and Teacher Education, 85, 45–57. Dimyati, J. (2016). Pembelajaran terpadu untuk taman kanak-kanak/ raudhatul athfal dan sekolah dasar. Prenamedia Group. Dinçer, Ç., & Akgün, E. (2015). Developing a classroom management skills inventory for preschool teachers and the correlation of preschool teachers’ classroom management skills with different variables. Egitim Ve Bilim, 40(117). Duffin, L., Patrick, H., & French, B. (2012). The teachers’ sense of efficacy scale: Confirming the factor structure with beginning pre-service teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 28(6), 827–834. Essa, E. (2011). Introduction to early childhood education. Wadsworth. Harwati, D., & Mariyanti, S. (2014). Hubungan antara self-efficacy dengan burnout pada pengajar taman kanak-kanak sekolah “X” di Jakarta. Jurnal Psikologi, 12(2), 54–60. Ismawati, D., & Prasetyo, I. (2020). Efektivitas pembelajaran menggunakan video zoom cloud meeting pada anak usia dini era pandemi covid-19. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 5(1), 665-675. DOI: 10.31004/obsesi. v5i1.671 Jackman, H. (2011). Early education curriculum: A child’s connection to the world. Delmar Thomson Learning. Jalal, M. (2020). Kesiapan guru menghadapi pembelajaran jarak jauh di masa covid-19. Smart Kids: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Anak Usa Dini, 2(1), 35–40. Johar, R., & Hanum, L. (2016). Strategi belajar mengajar. Penerbit Deepublish. Klassen, R. M., & Chiu, M. M. (2010). Effects on teachers’ self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 741–756. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019237 Lee, C., & Davis, H. (2014). Teacher self-efficacy. In W. Scarlett (Ed.), The sage encyclopedia of classroom management (Vol. 2, pp. 811-812). SAGE Publications Inc., https://www.doi.org/10.4135/9781483346243.n341. Masdudi, M. (2016). Karakteristik perkembangan pendidikan anak usia dini. Jurnal Pendidikan Anak, 1(2), 1-26. Moran, M., & Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805. Mulyani, S., Nasution, E., & Pratiwi, I. (2020). Hubungan efikasi diri dan keterikatan kerja guru taman kanak-kanak. JP3SDM, 9(1), 74-89. Ndari., & Chandrawaty. (2018). Telaah kurikulum pendidikan anak usia dini. Edu Publisher. Nindiati, D. (2020). Pengelolaan pembelajaran jarak jauh yang memandirikan siswa dan implikasinya pada pelayanan pendidikan. Journal of Education and Instruction, 3(1), 14-20. Restyningtyas, D. (2013). Penerapan Child Centered pada Anak Usia Dini di Taman Anak (TA) Sanggar Anak Alam (SALAM). Fakultkas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Saifulloh, A. M., & Darwis, M. (2020). Manajemen pembelajaran dalam meningkatkan efektifikas proses belajar mengajar di masa pandemic covid-19. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. 3(2). Saptaningrum, ernawati & wiwik, & refiane, fine. (2012). Model pembelajaran aktif kreatif efektif menyenangkan melalui pendekatan tematik untuk pembelajaran sains. Jurnal penelitian pembelajaran fisika. 2. 10.26877/jp2f.v2i1/april.125. Scarlett, W. (Ed.) (2014). The sage encyclopedia of classroom management. (Vols. 1-2). SAGE Publications Inc., https://www.doi.org/10.4135/9781483346243 Schweinhart, L. (2016). Child-initiated learning. In D. Couchenour, & J. Chrisman (Eds.), The sage encyclopedia of contemporary early childhood education (pp. 231-233). SAGE Publications, Inc, https://www.doi.org/10.4135/9781483340333.n61 Shaukat, S., & Iqbal, H. (2012). Teacher self-efficacy as a function of student engagement, instructional strategies, and classroom management. Pakistan Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9(3), 82-85. Soedjono, 2008. Pembelajaran Sains Moderen. http://www.guru-scn/pakem.html. Syarah, E. S., Mayuni, I., & Dhieni, N. (2020). Understanding Teacher's Perspectives in Media Literacy Education as an Empowerment Instrument of Blended Learning in Early Childhood Classroom. Jurnal Pendidikan Usia Dini, 14(2), 201-214. Tiara, D. R., & Pratiwi, E. (2020). Mengukur Kesiapan Guru Sebagai Dasar Pembelajaran Daring Di Lembaga PAUD. Jurnal Golden Age, 4(02), 362-368. Utami, dkk. (2014). Modul PLPG pendidikan anak usia dini, Buku I. Konsorsium Sertifikasi Guru. Yusnita, N., & Muqowim. (2020). Pendekatan student centered learning dalam menanamkan karakter disiplin dan mandiri anak di TK Annur II. Jurnal Ilmiah Potentia, 5(2), 116–126.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,011

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,331
Écart entre enseignants0,308 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJPUD - Jurnal Pendidikan Usia DiniMême sujetEducational Methods and ImpactsTravaux en français237 207