MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4205439305 · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.42322

Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2–Positive Youths Tested in Emergency Departments

2022· article· en· W4205439305 sur OpenAlexafffundabout
Anna Funk, Todd A. Florin, Nathan Kuppermann, Daniel J. Tancredi, Jianling Xie, Kelly Kim, Mark I. Neuman, Lilliam Ambroggio, Amy C. Plint, Santiago Mintegi, Terry P. Klassen, Marina I. Salvadori, Richard Malley, Daniel C. Payne, Norma-Jean Simon, Adriana Yock‐Corrales, Jasmine R. Nebhrajani, Pradip P. Chaudhari, Kristen Breslin, Yaron Finkelstein, Carmen Campos, Kelly R. Bergmann, Maala Bhatt, Fahd A. Ahmad, Michael Gardiner, Usha Avva, Nipam Shah, Laura F. Sartori, Vikram Sabhaney, Kerry Caperell, Nidhya Navanandan, Meredith L Borland, Claudia R. Morris, Iker Gangoiti, Viviana Pavlicich, Nirupama Kannikeswaran, Maren M. Lunoe, Pedro Rino, April Kam, Jonathan C. Cherry, Alexander J. Rogers, Shu‐Ling Chong, Laura Palumbo, Carlos Miguel Angelats Romero, Andrea K. Morrison, Maria Y. Kwok, Sarah M. Becker, Andrew Dixon, Naveen Poonai, Michelle Eckerle, Muhammad Wassem, Stuart R. Dalziel, Stephen B. Freedman, Jessica Gómez‐Vargas, Bethany Lerman, James Chamberlain, Adebola Owolabi, Camilla Schanche-Perret Gentil, Sofie Ringold, Jocy Perez, Heidi Vander Velden, Tyrus Crawford, Steven Schultz, Kimberly Ross, Kathy Monroe, Karly Stillwell, Jillian Benedetti, Sharon O’Brien, Kyle Pimenta, Amia Andrade, Adam Isacoff, Kendra Sikes, Nina Gold, Kathleen Reichard, Maureen Nemetski, Pavani Avva, Rakesh D. Mistry, Shanon Young, Marlena Cook, V. Gómez Barrena, Sandra Castejón-Ramírez, María T García Castellanos, Emma Patterson, A Tisherman Samuel, Redjana Carciurmaru, Eleanor Fitzpatrick, Megan Bonisch, Bruce Wright, Mithra Sivakumar, Patricia Candelaria, Vincent Cervantes, Shaminy Manoranjithan, Nabeel Khan, Toni Harbour, Usha Sethuraman, Priya Spencer, Neha Gupta, Amira S. Kamboj, Gael Muanamputu, Guillermo Kohn Loncarica, Eugenia Hernández, Ana Dragovetzky, Isabel Beneyto Ferré, Sylvia Torres, Joseph J. Zorc, Rebecca Haber, Ren Mee Hiong, Dianna Sri Dewi, Gary Joubert, Kamary Coriolano Dasilva, Julie Ochs, Alberto Arrighini, Camilla Dallavilla, Andrea Kachelmeyer, Daisy Marty Placencia

Notice bibliographique

RevueJAMA Network Open · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Établissements canadiensChildren’s Health Research InstituteUniversity of AlbertaDalhousie UniversityMcMaster Children's HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of OttawaPublic Health Agency of CanadaStollery Children's HospitalIzaak Walton Killam Health CentreUniversity of ManitobaChildren's Hospital Research Institute of ManitobaUniversity of CalgaryChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Organismes subventionnairesNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlberta Children's Hospital Research InstituteCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical CenterChildren's Hospital FoundationUniversity of California, DavisAlberta InnovatesUniversity of CalgaryAlberta Health ServicesAlberta Children's Hospital Foundation
Mots-clésMedicineEmergency departmentPediatricsCohort studyPsychological interventionSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Prospective cohort studyCohortEmergency medicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Internal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Importance: Severe outcomes among youths with SARS-CoV-2 infections are poorly characterized. Objective: To estimate the proportion of children with severe outcomes within 14 days of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 in an emergency department (ED). Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study with 14-day follow-up enrolled participants between March 2020 and June 2021. Participants were youths aged younger than 18 years who were tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection at one of 41 EDs across 10 countries including Argentina, Australia, Canada, Costa Rica, Italy, New Zealand, Paraguay, Singapore, Spain, and the United States. Statistical analysis was performed from September to October 2021. Exposures: Acute SARS-CoV-2 infection was determined by nucleic acid (eg, polymerase chain reaction) testing. Main Outcomes and Measures: Severe outcomes, a composite measure defined as intensive interventions during hospitalization (eg, inotropic support, positive pressure ventilation), diagnoses indicating severe organ impairment, or death. Results: Among 3222 enrolled youths who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection, 3221 (>99.9%) had index visit outcome data available, 2007 (62.3%) were from the United States, 1694 (52.6%) were male, and 484 (15.0%) had a self-reported chronic illness; the median (IQR) age was 3 (0-10) years. After 14 days of follow-up, 735 children (22.8% [95% CI, 21.4%-24.3%]) were hospitalized, 107 (3.3% [95% CI, 2.7%-4.0%]) had severe outcomes, and 4 children (0.12% [95% CI, 0.03%-0.32%]) died. Characteristics associated with severe outcomes included being aged 5 to 18 years (age 5 to <10 years vs <1 year: odds ratio [OR], 1.60 [95% CI, 1.09-2.34]; age 10 to <18 years vs <1 year: OR, 2.39 [95% CI 1.38-4.14]), having a self-reported chronic illness (OR, 2.34 [95% CI, 1.59-3.44]), prior episode of pneumonia (OR, 3.15 [95% CI, 1.83-5.42]), symptoms starting 4 to 7 days prior to seeking ED care (vs starting 0-3 days before seeking care: OR, 2.22 [95% CI, 1.29-3.82]), and country (eg, Canada vs US: OR, 0.11 [95% CI, 0.05-0.23]; Costa Rica vs US: OR, 1.76 [95% CI, 1.05-2.96]; Spain vs US: OR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.27-0.98]). Among a subgroup of 2510 participants discharged home from the ED after initial testing and who had complete follow-up, 50 (2.0%; 95% CI, 1.5%-2.6%) were eventually hospitalized and 12 (0.5%; 95% CI, 0.3%-0.8%) had severe outcomes. Compared with hospitalized SARS-CoV-2-negative youths, the risk of severe outcomes was higher among hospitalized SARS-CoV-2-positive youths (risk difference, 3.9%; 95% CI, 1.1%-6.9%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, approximately 3% of SARS-CoV-2-positive youths tested in EDs experienced severe outcomes within 2 weeks of their ED visit. Among children discharged home from the ED, the risk was much lower. Risk factors such as age, underlying chronic illness, and symptom duration may be useful to consider when making clinical care decisions.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,019
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,756

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,099
Tête enseignante GPT0,463
Écart entre enseignants0,365 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations47
Publié2022
Routes d'admission3
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJAMA Network OpenMême sujetCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesTravaux en français237 207