Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The hour was late. The corridor was dark. As a young resident, I hurried through the corridor, trying to respond to the demands of the pager and eager to catch a few minutes of sleep. As I rounded the corner, I collided with a figure in black and stumbled backward. A gentle hand reached forward to steady me and a kind voice inquired if I was all right. Regaining my balance, I recognized the figure as one of the hospital chaplains and reassured him that all was fine. Soothed by the calmness of his manner, I allowed myself to sit and talk. His question was both direct and unexpected. He inquired why I no longer seemed to spend time with Mr. A, a man who had severe amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Everyone knew that his death was imminent and I responded that it was difficult to visit when the members of the medical team no longer had anything to offer. Father C asked a few questions, some medical and some personal. He probed my feelings about dying and the impact of my youthful experience with the death of my father in shaping my current thoughts and ideas. Slowly, gently, he led me to understand that once a cure was no longer possible, caring was still a major form of therapy for the patient. He described a far more valuable form of care available to the patient now that the medical possibilities had been exhausted—namely myself. He suggested that I get to know Mr. A: what he had done for a living, where he had lived, what he enjoyed doing, and how he had spent his leisure time. Father C helped me to understand that death was not a failure of medical therapy but rather the completion of a full and joyous life. I came to appreciate that Mr. A didn't fear death—I did. I realized that despite the fact that I had performed the history and physical examination on this patient and visited him daily, Father C knew far more about the patient than I did. The conversation took little more than ten minutes, but in that brief time I learned an important life lesson. I turned down the hall and dropped in on Mr. A. He was surprised to see me at this hour of the night since the medical staff made a quick visit in the morning only. For the remaining two weeks of his life, I learned about the person who was Mr. A and we became friends. I mourned, along with his family, when he finally died. But the moment of revelation remained. Thanks to Father C, I came to appreciate that the person, not the disease, should receive care. Care is the foundation of real therapy; the cure is just a bonus.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,008 | 0,037 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,011 | 0,012 |
| Communication savante | 0,013 | 0,011 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,012 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,014 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,113 | 0,058 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».