MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4205620171 · doi:10.21608/jhiph.2002.205135

Assessment of Job Satisfaction among Primary Health Care Providers in Alexandria, Egypt

2002· article· en· W4205620171 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mohammed Saleem, Iman Darwish, Hoda Ghrib

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of High Institute of Public Health · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueHealth and Well-being Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésJob satisfactionQuarter (Canadian coin)NursingMedicineHealth careFamily medicineSample (material)PsychologySocial psychologyGeography

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Job satisfaction is a measure of worker perception. Satisfaction is known to impact work performance, learning recruitment and retentions. Information about job satisfaction among health care providers in Alexandria and factors influencing it are inadequate. Therefore, this study aimed at assessment of the level of job satisfaction and the related dimensions among primary health care [PHC] providers in Alexandria. Moreover, the study aimed at examining the demographic and job characteristics in relation to job satisfaction. For achieving the aims of this study, a descriptive cross sectional approach was adopted. All available health care personnel providing PHC services in the seven health districts in Alexandria were included in the study. Data were collected using a structured closed self-administered specially-designed internal and external, each of which has nine dimensions. An overall job satisfaction score was calculated, taking into account importance and satisfaction subsidiaries. Data were collected during the period from July to September 2002. The studied sample totaled 538 health care providers. One quarter of the studied health care providers [25.3%] were physicians, more than half [54.5%] was nursing staff while paramedical personnel constituted 20.2%. Generally, job dissatisfaction was highly prevalent [74.2%] among the studied sample with a median Job Satisfaction Score [JSS] of -42. Dissatisfaction was high for external dimension, compared to the internal one [78.4% compared to 68.2%]. Moreover, overt dissatisfaction was highly prevalent regarding the 18 dimensions of job satisfaction, where the percent of dissatisfaction ranged from 47.2% to 77.3% of the sample. Moreover, PHC providers were least satisfied with available facilities, morality, financial advantages, work environment, and work regulation systems. On the other hand, PHC workers were most satisfied with gratitude &esteem, autonomy, social advantages, self-expression, work style and work group. Exploring the relation between demographic and job characteristics separately with job satisfaction revealed that, older health workers, males, physicians and senior workers had significantly higher median [JSS]compared to their counterparts. Multiple logistic regression results, stepwise models revealed that, being male was a predictor for being a satisfied physician, carrying Bachelor certificates and increasing age were predictors for being a satisfied nurse, increasing age, decreasing duration of work and carrying certificate less than Bachelor were predictors for being a satisfied paramedical personnel. It was recommended that: workload should be reduced through reforming the primary health care system and PHC workers should be provided by in-service vocational training, adequate salaries and incentives, as well as adequate administrative support.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,236
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,992

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,044
Tête enseignante GPT0,359
Écart entre enseignants0,315 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2002
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of High Institute of Public HealthMême sujetHealth and Well-being StudiesTravaux en français237 207