MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4205644446 · doi:10.1353/phx.2011.0041

Exemplary Epic: Silius Italicus' Punica. (Oxford Classical Monographs) by Ben Tipping

2011· article· en· W4205644446 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Gesine Manuwald

Notice bibliographique

RevuePhoenix · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueClassical Antiquity Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEPICHistoryValue (mathematics)LiteraturePoetryInterpretation (philosophy)ClassicsArt historyArtPhilosophyMathematics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

410 PHOENIX A recent article with thephrase initstitle concerns a specialized combination ofnursery night-light andfood warmer;1 thegaudy anddiverse examples display vividly that even a narrow function canelicit manifold forms. Columbia University inthe CityofNewYork James E. G. Zetzel Exemplary Epic:SiliusItalicus'Punica. ByBenTipping. Oxford: Oxford University Press (Oxford Classical Monographs). 2010.Pp.x,245. Thisbook(theauthor's revised Oxford doctoral dissertation) addstothesmall number ofmonographs on SiliusItalicus' Punica and,more generally, is part oftheongoing revival ofinterest inFlavian epic(asshown byanincreasing number ofpublications and conferences). Outofthemany issues ofSilius Italicus' Punica thatstill await further discussion, BenTipping hasselected thestatus ofkey figures functioning asexemplary characters. He analyzes theparticular shape Silius Italicus hasgiven tothese historical exemplars inthecontext ofthecontemporary situation atRome, andhealsotakes into account theintertextual relationships with thegeneric tradition (10-11): I believe Silius sensitive tothe problems ofRoman history. Henot only evinces nostalgia for the past, but also presents itasa time when the seeds ofsubsequent decline were sown. I propose to show inthis monograph that ifSilius parades exemplary Romans, healsoraises questions about their value asexemplars. Such representation prompts consideration ofthe exemplary status ofthe figures sorepresented and ofthe process by which epic poetry establishes heroic models. Tipping regards hispresentation ofSilius Italicus' description ofheroes from theSecond Punic Warandtheresulting conclusions onthepoet's viewofthepastinrelation to thepresent as a contribution to ongoing scholarly discussions on the"optimistic" or "pessimistic" interpretation ofRoman epic. In anintroductory chapter ("Exordium") Tipping discusses thekey concepts ofhis study, considering the Roman tradition ofhistorical epic andthe role ofexemplary figures. Another preliminary chapter ("Perspective andParadigm") explores basic aspects ofsuch characters aswellastheir relationship tothehistorical andtheliterary traditions. The main body ofthe bookconsists ofdetailed casestudies ofthree major figures intheepic ("Hannibal," "Fabius Maximus Cunctator," "Scipio Africanus Maior"). Theinvestigation finishes with someconcluding remarks ontheshaping androleofhistorical figures in Silius Italicus ("Upending"); attheend,thevolume provides a comprehensive multilingual bibliography andindices. Thesecond chapter sketches theframework for theanalysis ofcasestudies ofindividual heroes byconsidering issues suchas therelationship between myth andhistory, between virtue andviceinthebehaviour ofindividuals, aswellasbetween characters in theepicandactual historical figures, with a focus onSilius Italicus, butincluding references toother literary works. Tipping attempts toshow howSilius Italicus' narrative isinextricably linked with theassessment offigures from contemporary history andthe recent pastandalsowith thepresentation of"historical" andmythical heroes inearlier epics. Attheendofthis chapter healready voices hisview ofthetensions andambiguities that underlie Silius Italicus' poem:"ThepastSilius portrays isatonceanidealthat 1C.Penn-Romine, "Veilleuse-théières : Form andFunction inNightLight Teapots," Gastronomica 10(2010) 45-48. BOOK REVIEWS/COMPTESRENDUS 411 contrasts with subsequent decline, thesource ofthat decline, anddisconcertingly parallel with thepresent" (49). Although inTipping's viewfigures suchas Romulus, Scipio, andDomitian were exemplary heroic characters serving asmodels inSilius Italicus, he believes that they still bearelements ofindividuality andthat their character portrayal exhibits tensions astheir behaviour andtypical features may beseenina positive light, butareclosetocorresponding negative characteristics atthesame time. Thethree major figures arethen discussed against the background oftheir appearance inearlier literature. Thechapter onHannibal charts thedepiction ofthis character over thecourse ofthePunica inrelation totheliterary tradition; itdemonstrates thepositive andnegative characteristics highlighted; anditaddresses thequestion ofwhat kind of example sucha figure might provide to Roman audiences. WhileTipping describes Hannibal's predominantly negative characterization, heargues that, dueto"intertextual instability," healsodisplays positive Roman virtues, which invite recipients ofthepoem todraw parallels with Roman heroes. Similarly, according toTipping, theRoman heroes inSilius Italicus arenotpresented aswholly positive characters; instead, thenarrative reveals that there areproblems with their useofpower, their political views, andtheir status asunique heroes, which turn them into problematic examples ofRoman heroism: for instance, Scipioisbotha piousandcourageous fighter andalsogiven toexcessive emotions andassociated with autocrats. Throughout, Tipping works closely onthetext andcarefully documents thebasis for hisinterpretation byproviding references torelevant passages intheLatintext aswell asquotations ofkey passages where appropriate. Although occasionally this makes the prose somewhat difficult toread, thefull documentation isuseful andenables readers to engage fully with Tipping's proposals. Bypointing outaplethora ofpossible connections, Tipping emphasizes that Silius Italicus' epiccannot befully appreciated inisolation, but that itisintimately connected with thecontemporary historical andpolitical context as wellaswith previous literary works - Virgil's Aeneid, Lucan's Bellum civile , andLivy's Ab urbe condita inparticular. Eventhough notallpossible intertextual andhistorical connections outlined inthis investigation seem tobeequally straightforward orofthesame relevance, thestudy confirms thesophisticated literary texture ofSilius Italicus' epic,anditshows that hehas created hischaracters onthe basis ofa variety ofexisting literary andhistorical works and that healsomakes a statement onRome's political development uptohistime. Byhis argument Tipping provides insightful readings ofSilius Italicus' compositional technique with reference tothecharacterization ofhistorical figures inthepoem.Whileearlier scholarship...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,483
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,754

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,060
Tête enseignante GPT0,299
Écart entre enseignants0,239 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePhoenixMême sujetClassical Antiquity StudiesTravaux en français237 207