Editors' Note / Note des éditeurs
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Canadian Graduate Journal of Sociology and Criminology (CGJSC) came to be from an impromptu idea during a professional development seminar for Sociology PhD students at the University of Waterloo.While discussing the perils of graduate publishing, we realized that the opportunities for graduate students to learn the culture of academic publication were few and far between.Many of us felt confused, afraid and that we did not have proper knowledge of the publication process to confidently submit material to existing journals.A discussion ensued about how graduate conferences are legitimate stepping-stones into the life of a professional academic; yet, there was nothing comparable for our written work.While other graduate journals and publication platforms exist, it became rapidly evident to us that the levels of academic rigour akin to the actual publication process were lacking.We set out to create a journal in which graduate students can share and publish their research in a manner reflecting the realities of professional academic publication, while espousing an understanding and didactic approach.We strive to be the best journal that we can be, mirroring the academic standards of other peer-reviewed publications, while concurrently understanding that the graduate experience is about learning and growing.Through our use of an open-access journal format, social networking platforms, and other communication technologies, our hope is to be accessible and pivotal in uniting graduate scholarship across Canada.At its heart, CGJSC is a journal for graduate students, by graduate students across Canada and beyond.To foster inclusiveness, we chose to make our journal bilingual to reflect the multicultural and multilingual nature of Canada.Though centered on the disciplines of sociology and criminology, in keeping with our philosophy of inclusivity, we actively encourage contributions and involvement from Masters and Doctoral students across all the social sciences.Becoming involved with CGJSC is not just limited to publishing, but includes editorial tasks such as peer-reviewing, copy-editing, manuscript selection, among other roles.CGJSC could not have been established without the dedication of numerous individuals.First and foremost, we would like to thank the University of Waterloo department of Sociology and Legal Studies for both material support and guidance, in particular the encouragement of Dr. Lorne Dawson.The efforts of Dr. Peter Carrington and Dr. Jennifer Schulenberg were also critical during our formative stages.Their editorial expertise was an invaluable asset in learning how a high-quality journal should operate.The University of Waterloo Library Services provided CGJSC with much needed technical support.The efforts of Tim Ireland, Chris Gray, Graham Faulkner and Pascal Calarco were fundamental in laying the foundation of establishing our journal's infrastructure.Additional thanks go out to our faculty advisory board who continue to champion our cause in many departments across Canada.Lastly, we would like to acknowledge the integral contribution of our anonymous peer-reviewers.Peer-reviewers are the cornerstone of the publication process, and without their hard work, this issue would not have been possible.We hope you enjoy reading our first issue, and all the issues to come.The task of publishing a graduate journal has been a challenging but rewarding experience for uswe hope the fruits of our (and your) labour will be enjoyed by our readership for many years to come!
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,060 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,030 | 0,026 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».