MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4205735034 · doi:10.1353/vp.2005.0035

Tennyson

2005· article· en· W4205735034 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Linda K. Hughes

Notice bibliographique

RevueVictorian poetry · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueHistorical and Literary Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoliticsLiteraturePoetryMoralityPatriotismEmpireImmoralityAllusionGreeksDutyClassicsScholarshipDemocracyPhilosophyHistorySociologyLawArtTheologyAncient history

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Tennyson Linda K. Hughes (bio) The public Tennyson and his cultural politics most frequently preoccupied significant scholarship in 2004. In Stateliest Measures: Tennyson and the Literature of Greece and Rome (Univ. of Toronto Press), the year's most sustained contribution to Tennyson studies, A. A. Markley draws upon his training in the classics, formal analysis, intertexuality, Tennyson's annotated classical texts in the Tennyson Research Center, and publishing history to treat Tennyson's classical poems as a unified body of work that, like Virgil's own, deliberately invited comparison with classical precursors and sought to serve the nation by inspiring patriotism and fostering thoughtful morality among its citizens. Tennyson, according to Markley, could neither conceive nor share his classically [End Page 389] inspired poetry without engaging Victorian debates over whether the ancient Greeks represented immorality or democracy, the Roman empire signified republicanism or greedy exploitation and tyranny, and classical meters could or could not be transposed into English. Tennyson's exchanges with classical literature, then, necessarily intersected with cultural politics as well. Since Virgil himself suggested that the high moral purpose of poetry compelled the poet to question potentially ruinous costs of empire as well as its patriotic call to duty, Tennyson emerges in Markley's study as an inquiring imperialist whose classical poems affirmed moral, patriotic, and spiritual ideals but also assayed the empire's toll and the nation's imperfect moral health. Important local insights (some published in earlier articles reviewed in "This Year's Work") as well as this larger synthesis emerge from Markley's highly effective merging of publishing history and classical scholarship with cultural analysis. He points out in chapter two ("The Building Blocks of Song: Constructing the Classical Dramatic Monologue") that allusion to multiple classical sources in individual poems and chiastic word play—both defining techniques of Greek and Latin texts—summon philosophical issues as frames of reference (e.g., how to balance self-development and self control in an era of increasing change) while recreating in English what it feels like to read classical literature. His chapter on In Memoriam reads the "Fair ship" sequence in terms of the classical subgenre of propemptikon, or poem addressed to one setting out on a voyage, and the "Dark house" sections (7 and 119) in relation to paraclausithyron, or address by the pleading lover to the mistress behind bolted doors, and so recuperates for current students the frames of reference within which the poem could have resonated for the classically educated among Tennyson's readers. Even more useful is Markley's suggestion that the Prologue's second stanza ("lo, thy foot / Is on the skull which thou hast made") recalls the love elegy of Propertius in which the figure of Eros or Love steps on the lover's head "with his foot," a means by which Tennyson could introduce the persona of Love into the poem even when his discourse seems most Christian. Contributing to the recent interest in Victorian meters led by Yopie Prins and Herbert Tucker, Markley's chapter on classical prosody extends his own taxonomy of Tennyson's experimentation (from replication of classical meters to approximations to adaptations in English verse) by integrating materialist analysis of layout and publishing history. Tennyson's reliance on periodicals for the first publication of many of these experiments, Markley argues, enabled him to test the waters for what might otherwise have been thought mere ephemera unsuited to inclusion in a volume. And Tennyson (anticipating an important development in twentieth-century poetry) made innovative use of layout: he wished to print "To Virgil" in long-lined couplets to approximate the hexameters of his forebear; indented the third lines of his quatrains in "The Daisy" to recall Horace's Alcaics, the third line of whose [End Page 390] quatrains was always shortened; and inserted "The Daisy," "Will," and "To the Rev. F. D. Maurice" (all adaptations of Horatian Alcaics) between the Wellington Ode and "Charge of the Light Brigade" in Maud, and Other Poems (1855) because, Markley suggests, they would have sustained associations of a great empire and its heroic patriotism through the echo of Horace, whom informed Victorians considered a lofty exemplar of imperial Rome. But amid specifying...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,884
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,873

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,277
Écart entre enseignants0,264 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2005
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueVictorian poetryMême sujetHistorical and Literary StudiesTravaux en français237 207