MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4205777756 · doi:10.1353/phx.2016.0016

Ancient Sex: New Essays by Ruby Blondell and Kirk Ormand

2016· article· en· W4205777756 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Daniel Orrells

Notice bibliographique

RevuePhoenix · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueHistorical and Literary Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPrestigeHonourPopularityHistoryClassicsBattlefieldBattleLiteratureArtAncient historyLawPhilosophyPolitical scienceArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

414 PHOENIX of athletes (71–72) and offers an instructive analysis of Plutarch’s two versions of how the bad news travelled from Sicily to Athens (75–78). She outlines how festivals for the same divinities or in memory of the same triumphs or featuring the same events helped fashion an interwoven network of the fractious communities of the Greek world (216–219). The race in armour is (rightly) said to appear on so many vases because of its artistic possibilities—this is not an index of its popularity or its prestige (165). The presentation is clear, with many sub-headings in each chapter and plenty of crossreferences ; there are indexes of names and of subjects (the latter explaining Greek terms, making the book accessible even to non-specialists); typos are few. Eleven illustrations buttress observations on art. Nonetheless, some questions remain. What are we to make of those who questioned or denied or ridiculed the connection of sport with war, not just intellectuals (Xenophanes) and characters invented by them (in Euripides’ Autolycus) but, so it is said, commanders themselves (Epaminondas, Philopoemen)? Why do festivals that honour them or their victories (Sparta’s Lysandreia, the Soteria at Delphi) often feature competitions in mousikē too? Why do sport and war so often seem out of step? Hoplite warfare did not bring team sports into the panhellenic festivals, nor did the increasing importance of naval warfare introduce boat races. The Homeric ethos and example may provide sufficient reason. But why, in that case, were some events that were good enough for Iliad’s warriors—archery, mock battle—also absent from major festivals and why did the two-horse chariot, used by them in battle and in sport, find a place in the Olympic program only at the end of the fifth century? Indeed, why does Homer have Epeius, one of the contestants in the boxing match at Patroclus’ games, admit that he is a poor soldier? As for that most military of Olympic events, the race in armour: it had been added over a century before the two-horse chariot race, but that too was relatively late, given the link of soldier and athlete on which Angeli Bernardini insists. Such questions do not invalidate her approach, focused as it is on ideology above all. But they perhaps remind us how poorly ideology may fit with practice. University of Winnipeg Mark Golden Ancient Sex: New Essays. Edited by Ruby Blondell and Kirk Ormand. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press. 2015. Pp. xii, 342. With the publication of Kenneth Dover’s and Michel Foucault’s books on the history of sexuality, the subject became a central concern for classicists. Volumes such as Before Sexuality examined, developed, and refined Dover’s and Foucault’s arguments.1 Others were much more critical of the Dover/Foucault axis. Amy Richlin, for instance, questioned Foucault’s argument about ancient acts and ancient identities, and James Davidson argued that Dover and Foucault were much too phallocentric.2 The debates, sometimes fierce, other times humorous, found a context when AIDS was ravaging the gay community in the 1980s and early to mid ’90s. Whether ancient Greeks could be gay, or 1 K. Dover, Greek Homosexuality (Cambridge, MA 1978); M. Foucault, The History of Sexuality (3 vols.; Harmondsworth 1978–1986); D. Halperin, J. Winkler, and F. Zeitlin (eds.), BeforeSexuality: The Construction of Erotic Experience in the Ancient Greek World (Princeton 1990). 2 A. Richlin, “Not Before Homosexuality: The Materiality of the Cinaedus and the Roman Law against Love between Men,” Journal of the History of Sexuality 3 (1993) 523–573; J. Davidson, The Greeks and Greek Love: A Radical Reappraisal of Homosexuality in Ancient Greece (London 2007). BOOK REVIEWS/COMPTES RENDUS 415 not, simply mattered. What it meant to have a gay heritage was a concern of profound significance at a time when AIDS seemed genocidal: how to remember so many who were once part of our present and are now consigned to the past? As Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick memorably put it, gay and queer people “have with difficulty and always belatedly to patch together from fragments a community, a usable heritage, a politics of survival or...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,280
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,305

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,249
Écart entre enseignants0,234 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2016
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePhoenixMême sujetHistorical and Literary StudiesTravaux en français237 207