Age‐Adjusted Serum Neurofilament Predicts Cognitive Decline in Parkinson's Disease (<scp>MARK‐PD</scp>)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
We read with great interest the study by Aamodt and colleagues reporting that plasma neurofilament light (NfL) chain levels are associated with UPDRS III (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, Part III) score but not the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (DRS-2), whereas plasma NfL predicted cognitive decline (DRS-2 change) but not motor worsening (UPDRS III ≥5 points).1 Interestingly, these findings are in line with our results that serum NfL was associated with UPDRS III but not Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score, whereas serum NfL predicted cognitive decline (decrease in MoCA score >2 points) but not motor worsening (increase in UPDRS III >4 points) in the Biomarkers in Parkinson's Disease (MARK-PD) study.2 Numerous studies have shown that blood NfL predicts cognitive decline in patients with Parkinson's disease, but cutoff values determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed very different results.1-3 Given that serum NfL levels increase by 3.35% per year in PD patients and double in individuals above 70 years compared with those below 50 years in the normal population, age is the most important covariate of NfL variability.4, 5 Consequently, we hypothesize that age-adjusted NfL percentiles might reveal more consistent results among cohort studies compared with absolute NfL values for the prediction of disease progression in PD patients. Therefore, we evaluated if the plasma NfL cutoff value of 14.6 pg/mL determined by Aamodt and colleagues also predicts cognitive decline in the Mark-PD study.6 Furthermore, we analyzed if age-adjusted serum NfL above the 95th percentile predicts cognitive decline in MARK-PD. In MARK-PD, serum NfL and cognitive outcome (initial and follow-up MoCA scores) were available for 106 patients with PD (age: 64.6 ± 8.8 years, men: 60.4%, disease duration: 12 [7.5, 15.5] years, follow-up: 512 [365, 680] days). During follow-up, we registered 21 patients with cognitive decline (decrease in MoCA score >2 points). In a Kaplan–Meier analysis, we observed no association between serum NfL levels and faster cognitive decline using a cutoff value of 14.6 pgl/mL (log-rank test: P = 0.322) (Fig. 1A). However, patients with NfL levels above the age-adjusted 95th percentile revealed a significantly faster cognitive decline (P = 0.026) than those below (Fig. 1B). This difference remained significant after further adjustment for age, sex, disease duration, and initial MoCA score (P = 0.017) (Fig. 1C). In summary, both studies using different cognitive scales (ie, DRS-2 and MoCA) show that increased NfL levels predict cognitive decline in PD patients. We suggest that NfL levels above the age-adjusted 95th percentile are independently associated with cognitive decline. We propose that age-adjusted NfL cutoffs might reveal more consistent results across different cohort studies and therefore facilitate the establishment of NfL as a clinically useful blood-based biomarker in patients with PD. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».