Comment on: Measuring the impacts of the <i>Using Antibiotics Wisely</i> campaign on Canadian community utilization of oral antibiotics for respiratory tract infections: a time-series analysis from 2015 to 2019

A recently published paper by Rolf von den Baumen et al.1 detailed the conduct of a population-based study in Canada of community-pharmacy-dispensed antibiotics for respiratory tract infections (RTIs) from January 2015 to December 2019. As leaders of Choosing Wisely Canada, the national campaign that launched Using Antibiotics Wisely, we are delighted to see research on strategies to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing in the community setting in Canada. However, we do not agree that this study can be used to assess this campaign’s impact. First, only a 13 month follow-up period was available following development and early dissemination of Using Antibiotics Wisely, which is an inadequate time frame for expecting antibiotic prescribing practices to change across a country. While Canada has a universal, publicly funded healthcare system, care is decentralized and regionalized and there is significant variation and heterogeneity in modes of primary care delivery. Second, the early goal of Using Antibiotics Wisely was focused on engagement of primary care providers, building relationships with key organizations, including the College of Family Physicians of Canada, and working at local levels to pilot and refine these clinical tools to support practice improvement. It was never the expectation of Choosing Wisely Canada that passive dissemination of these tools would be sufficient to change antibiotic prescribing as they needed to be coupled with context-appropriate implementation strategies.2 The approach of Using Antibiotics Wisely is based on the well-established de-implementation science literature, which underscores that raising awareness and education are necessary, but not sufficient, to change practice.3,4 Notably, a 2016 systematic review on interventions to reduce overuse highlights that the majority of studies combine multiple components in the interventions designed to reduce antibiotics and most combined some form of clinician education with either clinical decision support or provider-specific feedback about prescribing patterns. Changing clinical practice patterns and habits takes considerable time, with a 2021 systematic review of Choosing Wisely implementation highlighting that reducing low-value care requires significant organizational and health system investments over a sustained period of time.5 The study by Rolf von den Baumen et al.1 is therefore a premature evaluation given the expected latency period for seeing any impact of a campaign of this kind deployed at a national scale. Using Antibiotics Wisely was developed and launched cognizant of the formidable challenge of changing antibiotic prescribing in the outpatient setting. Most unnecessary antibiotic use is not related to knowledge or awareness gaps targeted by passive education, but rather to provider-level, patient and contextual factors. There are significant cognitive, psychological and behavioural drivers of unnecessary prescriptions both from the patient and provider perspective that have been targeted by a wide range of interventions, including those leveraging behavioural economics.6,7 Contrary to what is suggested by Rolf von den Baumen et al.,1 the clinical tools developed as part of this campaign do not focus on knowledge alone, but rather address some of these known barriers – through the use of viral prescription and delayed prescription for specific RTI syndromes. In addition to the clinical tools developed by primary care clinicians as part of Using Antibiotics Wisely, more recent efforts have been made to pair tools with further implementation supports. For example, these tools are being integrated into audit and feedback reports, electronic medical records and continuing medical education modules. Illustrative of this is a recently published randomized clinical trial of 3500 primary care physicians in Ontario who received a letter with peer comparison data on antibiotic prescribing alongside Using Antibiotics Wisely tools.8 A single feedback letter resulted in a non-significant trend toward reduced antibiotic prescriptions compared with controls [relative risk = 0.96 (97.5% CI = 0.92 –1.01); P = 0.06]. While not reaching statistical significance within 12 months, this likely reflects the need for more frequent feedback and longitudinal efforts to reduce antibiotic initiation, as compared with changes in antibiotic duration, which are easier to achieve.9 Reducing unnecessary antibiotic prescribing in primary care settings remains a challenge in Canada and indeed globally. Using Antibiotics Wisely draws on efforts and lessons learned to date from countries such as Australia that have launched multipronged interventions, including academic detailing, electronic medical record changes, education and awareness raising.10 A strength of Using Antibiotics Wisely is that it is led by the prescribers, with a strong focus on implementation strategies, rather than knowledge alone, with a long-term time horizon needed to achieve impact. K.B.B., J.A.L. and W.L. receive remuneration for their roles in the Choosing Wisely Canada campaign.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.