Notice bibliographique
Résumé
KATJAKALLIO ? "Wholly enttttainJaf...a noval that books ywin from tb* fira llae.?tba mfa lives tbe tragedy ofapeople whohm? been systematically i?niniliwd malsacrificed by history.' LUIS LEANTE I1 read the extent to which a marriage, i however long,can fall intoa shallow j habit between two people who have i barely known each other. Their con , versation and those around them has 1 consisted of irritatingly pedantic and i presumptive philosophical subjects, 1 such as thenature ofGod, as iftheir i opinions would suffice as the final 1 word in such matters, i For an observant reader, Kal j Ho's narrative is rich in symbols, the i most extraordinary ofwhich is the , explosion of a glass tabletop soon 1 after Henri's move out of the apart i ment. The table is designed by the 1 internationally famous Kaj Franck, i whose mention exemplifies current [ prose style. In it,labels and designer i names, presumed to be familiar to , readers, assume comparable impor 1 tance with narrative events and i characters. It's noteworthy that Tuu 1 likki's emotional blindness toward i Henri is offsetby Sofia's instinctive ' knowledge of Henri as a person, i The narrative is filteredthrough the , perspectives ofmany characters and i their curiously stilted lives, which , express the vulnerability of today's 1 human beings and the loss of emo tional anchors that would attach them to somethingmeaningful and lasting in life. To emphasize the fact, Kallio juxtaposes an immigrant Mus lim family, still a rare occurrence in Finnish society,having a picnic in a park. But for the father's head cover, he wears Western clothingwith the inevitable jeans. He attends to his threechildrenwhile themother sits serenely secure in her place with a soft scarf tied around her head. It occurs to Tuulikki that unlike thewomen she knows, theMuslim woman still has religion and tradi tions as her support. She embraces them as if they were rooms where every object is familiarand in itsown place, reflectingthedignity ofmany hundreds of years of culture. Thus the reader ismet with yet another instance inwhich Kallio reverses the familiarwith the unfamiliar while simultaneously jolting her readers from their comfort zones. Katja Kal lio is to be congratulated for narrat ing tous what, fora lack of a better word, we call postmodernity inboth itsweaknesses and rare triumphs. Seija Paddon Toronto Luis Leante. See How Much ILove You. = Martin Schifino, tr. London. Marion = Boyars.2009. 256 pages. ?9.99/$ 14.95.| isbn978-0-7145-3154-0| Luis Leante's enchanting, award- E winning 2009 novel, SeeHow Much I E Love You, reflectsthe misery faced in E thedesert of the Western Sahara in = the 1970swhile entangling the read- = er in a haunting love storybetween E two Spaniards who, in turn,become E involved with a dangerous and = hopeless Spanish colony inAfrica? = a place where "the scorching sun = and the dry, biting wind make it = impossible for life to go about its = business normally." Inspired by = Leante's humanitarian journey to E the area in 2005, this evocative novel E includes thenecessary historywhile E stillbeing satisfactorilyentertaining. = Eighteen-year-old Montse is = eager for adventure but confined E to her rich parents' house, and the E dashing Santiago San Roman ful- = fillsher yearning. As an optimistic = beginning forboth the couple and E the country, the two young lov- = ers become inseparable and fall = madly in love,with littleattention E to Spain's conflicts or politics. But E when Montse sees Santiago with E another girl and learns of her own E pregnancy, she vows to never speak E to him again, abandoning the rela- E tionship and driving him to mili- = taryservice in thedangerous depths = of the Western Sahara desert. San- = tiago is desperate and frustrated, = and finally forgetsMontse to find = love with a Saharawi woman living = near his base. Twenty years later, = Montse, now a brilliant but disheart- = ened doctor, is divorced, and her E only daughter has justdied. She had E heard years before thatSantiago had E been killed in battle, but coinciden- E tally she finds a photograph of him E in a patient's belongings. Her life- E January-February 2010 i67 H threatening journey to findhim in...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,020 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».