83 10 Years Later: Revisiting the Patchwork Quilt of Child Protection in Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In 2007, Bennett et al. characterized Canadian academic child maltreatment teams in “A survey of the 16 Canadian child and youth protection programs: A threadbare patchwork quilt”. This was the first Canadian study to assess the system of care for maltreated children in hospital-based protection programs. Many changes have occurred in the field in the last decade including the introduction of an Area of Focused Competence by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada and the development of Child and Youth Advocacy Centres. This study aimed to expand and update the knowledge gained from the original project. The goal was to help understand the current structure, functioning, and experiences of child maltreatment teams in Canada. We aimed to describe changes in the field over the last decade from the perspective of the program directors. A mixed-methods design was utilized and letters of invitation were sent to all directors of Canadian academic child maltreatment teams. An online survey was distributed using REDCap, to collect quantitative data on composition of the teams. The directors participated in one-on-one semi-structured interviews to gather qualitative information regarding their experiences working within their teams and the specialty. Where possible comparisons were made to the Bennett publication. 15/15 child maltreatment teams participated in the online survey. Data on team composition, programs for mental health and sexual abuse, peer review, funding, education, and research were gathered. From 12 qualitative interviews information on the programs’ identified strengths and needs, team leaders’ experiences, and reflections on the past decade were gathered. A qualitative analysis thematic approach was used to identify overarching themes that emerged throughout the discussions. Exemplar quotes were selected which highlighted themes such as “need for mental health resources”, “improving evidence and structure in the field”, “a changing landscape”, and “the importance of team dynamics”. Comparing results to the Bennett study demonstrates wide variation in program resources and structure. Documentation varies significantly across the country with no national database in place. Program directors noted a “changing landscape” in the past decade specifically in the court system, knowledge base, and formal specialization of the field. Through a combination of survey data and qualitative interviews, information on the structure, function, and experiences of Canadian child maltreatment teams was collected. Child maltreatment continues to be an important health and social issue and disseminating this data is important to inform research, education, and resource planning.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,022 | 0,046 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,041 | 0,011 |
| Communication savante | 0,015 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,006 | 0,009 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,010 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».