MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4206243523 · doi:10.1353/ohq.2014.0030

Pumpkin: The Curious History of an American Icon by Cindy Ott William Cronon

2014· article· en· W4206243523 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Garry Stephenson

Notice bibliographique

RevueOregon Historical Quarterly · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueArctic and Russian Policy Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésWhalingPoliticsFaithLawSovereigntyPolitical scienceEnvironmental ethicsFisheryHistoryArchaeologyPhilosophyBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

 OHQ vol. 115, no. 2 tions between whaling nations reflected that Progressive-era faith in science’s ability to resolve disputes.The gap between what regulators wanted and what scientists knew,however, was literally immeasurable. Technological and theoretical limits and institutional parsimony led to pervasive ignorance about whale biology and ecology, which is why regulators could not, even when they wanted to, lower harvest quotas.Whale science also illuminates broader themes in fisheries history,from Johann Hjort’s connections to industry to a qualification of Carmel Finley’s thesis about Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) in All the Fish in the Sea (2011). Finley argues that MSY emerged as an American political foil in 1949, but the British had articulated this concept by 1942 .It is hard not to conclude that science was set up to fail and that its inability to deliver aided pretty much everyone but the whales. The history of whaling conservation thus speaks to the problem of protecting nature in a complex and mediated world.Whaling critics have pursued soft and hard policies. Beginning in the 1970s, they sought culture change, claiming whales were fellow species. They won converts,butsensitivitytoculturaldiversityand socialequityhas curbedthe righteousnotionof asinglerelationshiptowhales.Inthe1980s,they also enrolled non-whaling nations to outvote opponents on the IWC, but Japan countered with the same tactic in the early 2000s.Whaling is a classic example why open-access fisheries fail. Performed on the high seas beyond the sovereignty of any state, harvesting was never disciplined. The late-twentieth-century rise of quasi-privatized quota systems could have rectified some problems, but by then antiwhaling groups had committed to prohibition. In making whaling a moral issue, though, they embraced an uncompromisable view.As whale populations rebound, and as whaling cultures assertrights,anti-whalersmayseealliesendorse accommodationsthat,likeintheearlytwentieth century, enable whalers to work inside rather than outside a global regulatory framework. In other words, Whales & Nations reminds us why the seemingly abstract concept of sovereignty matters when thinking about conservation . Dorsey weaves a tale of modern whaling, the IWC, and environmentalism that shows how culture, consumption, and science have shaped management for a century.His achievement here, as with The Dawn of Conservation Diplomacy (1998), illustrates the interplay of transnational and international impulses, and how both necessarily depend on who controls ecological space. Equally important, readers will enjoy it. Joseph E. Taylor, III Simon Fraser University Pumpkin: The Curious History of an American Icon by Cindy Ott foreword by William Cronon University of Washington Press, Seattle and London, 2012. Illustrations, notes, bibliography, index. 336 pages. $26.95 cloth. Long ago, as a graduate student in agriculture , I noticed the bibliographies of assigned readings often included a book published in 1949 by Salaman Redcliffe titled The History and Social Influence of the Potato. That book started an idiosyncrasy of noting books about foodstuffs.When I received the review copy of Pumpkin: The Curious History of an American Icon, there were two small tasks to begin my review. The first was to check the bibliography for Redcliffe’s book on the potato. It was there — a sign that the author was a foodstuff insider. The second task involved reading the first several sentences to see whether I would be drawn into a book about pumpkins — I was. Cindy Ott’s Pumpkin is thoroughly researched. It includes an extensive analysis of the literature and is fleshed out with interviews of farmers and community members.  OHQ vol. 115, no. 2 It draws from an expansive range of sources: fiction, non-fiction, poetry, magazine articles, cookbooks, school curricula, and more. The bibliography includes over 750 references and there are over 60 pages of notes. The book is both entertaining and scholarly. Pumpkin adds to a literature of food that perhapsstartedwiththeaforementionedpotato andnowincludesbananas(Bananas:AnAmericanHistorybyVirginiaScottJenkins ,Smithsonian Institution Press, 2000), apples (The Apple: A History of Canada’s Perfect Fruit by Carol Martin, McArthur & Co., 2007), dates (Dates: A Global History by Nawal Nasrallah, Reaktion Books,2011),andmanyothers.Wemayseeaday when all foods have books about them. Ott reexamines American history through the lens of the pumpkin. It is an undertaking that is both intellectual and fun. She traces the pumpkin’s trajectory, by describing its presence in the food and spiritual culture...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,102
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,203

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0120,005
Communication savante0,0050,005
Science ouverte0,0010,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0370,006

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,262
Écart entre enseignants0,249 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueOregon Historical QuarterlyMême sujetArctic and Russian Policy StudiesTravaux en français237 207