MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4206252885 · doi:10.1353/wlt.2020.0061

Heddi GoodrichLost in the Spanish Quarter

2020· article· en· W4206252885 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jeanne Bonner

Notice bibliographique

RevueWorld Literature Today · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueComparative Literary Analysis and Criticism
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésQuarter (Canadian coin)BiographyHistoryArt historyClassicsArtArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Heddi Goodrich Lost in the Spanish Quarter New York. HarperVia. 2019. 387 pages. SOMETIMES A NOVEL stands out less for its content and more for its very existence . Such a novel is Lost in the Spanish Quarter, by Heddi Goodrich, which distinguishes itself from other recently translated works—and other books set in Italy—for several notable reasons. For starters, the author and the translator are the same person . Goodrich originally wrote the novel in Italian and then translated it herself. What’s more, the book, which revisits a failed love affair between university students, is set in Naples, a fascinating Italian city that is less known to foreigners. Lastly, it was published by a new imprint of Harper called HarperVia , aimed at spotlighting “international voices.” The book is Goodrich’s debut novel. The author moved to Naples while she was in high school and remained there for university , graduating from L’Università degli Studi di Napoli “L’Orientale” with a master’s degree in languages. Her biography positions her well to bring a new perspective to the literary sphere since far fewer books in the English-speaking world have been written about or set in Naples. As she writes in the novel, “Naples was never a choice. It was a gift that had to be forced on you, by birth or by fate.” The work tells the story of Heddi, an American student in Naples (like the author), and her group of Italian friends, including Pietro, from rural southern Italy, who quickly becomes her lover. The novel delivers in breathless fashion their whirlwind love story as it plays out in the exotic locale of Naples’s Spanish Quarter. Indeed, it reads like other college novels—lots of drinking and overthinking plus grousing about professors and classes. The setting, however, allows Goodrich to evoke class tensions and regional differences against the backdrop of the idiosyncratic Italian university system. Goodrich also taps into the rich epistolary tradition, and the parts of the book dedicated to Heddi’s and Pietro’s letters are the most enjoyable. The exchanges take place years after the relationship has wound down, and the narrative pivots between scenes of the love affair and the letters. Arguably, some of what distinguishes the book also hampers it as a novel for the English-speaking market. When Goodrich originally wrote the work in Italian, she could avail herself of a language full of impossibly long sentences whose clauses have clauses. That type of meandering prose doesn’t always translate well into English. a wealth of examples, where anatomy or behavior has evolved in a way that is dependent on the presence of certain genes and abilities in other organisms. Human speech might be one of the most direct illustration of this principle. Genes and cultures both evolve in response to the other, without being clearly separable. The social suite is an evolved expression of our genes outside of our bodies, something Christakis calls “exophenotype” and Dawkins before him has referred to as “extended phenotype”— something that an organism is genetically compelled to enact. Whereas classical examples of extended phenotypes are birds’ nests or spiderwebs, structures encoded in an organism’s genes built without any prior learning, Blueprint takes this concept to a new level of complexity with the societies we build. In his preface, Christakis gives some implicit credit in stating that “our good deeds are not just the products of Enlightenment values. They have a deeper and prehistoric origin.” However, when he later comes to develop the holism of genetic and cultural evolution, he fails to discuss how reason, science, or humanism might imprint on our biology or vice versa. In both his optimism and data-heavy arguments, Christakis’s book resembles Steven Pinker ’s Enlightenment Now, published only a year prior, in which the author builds the case for Enlightenment values and their role in the prosperity, health, and happiness of human societies that have adapted them over the past centuries. To a degree, these books feel like two parts of the same project. It might therefore seem disappointing that, when Christakis discusses the inherent interplay of biological and cultural evolution, he fails to pick up what he...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,136
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,454

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0040,002
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1360,047

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,229
Écart entre enseignants0,203 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueWorld Literature TodayMême sujetComparative Literary Analysis and CriticismTravaux en français237 207