Notice bibliographique
Résumé
PHOENIX Religion in the Roman Empire. By James B. Rives. Maiden, MA: Blackwell. 2007. Pp. x, 237, 11 illustrations, 4 maps. Merely conceptualizing a scholarly introduction to "religion" in the Roman empire poses quite a challenge to anyone familiar with recent work on the complexity of the subject. Wisely, this new introduction by James Rives, part of Blackwell's new series on ancient religions, undertakes this task as an experiment, less a "definitive account," but rather "a possible framework for thinking about" religion in the Roman empire which acknowledges the rich variety of evidence (2). The framework Rives suggests is based on the commonalities of religion across the heterogeneous mix in this era, a unity which he locates in a normatively understood idea of religion in the "social and conceptual world" of the empire (6). Chapter One, "Identifying 'Religion' in the Graeco-Roman World," begins to outline how different the religious was in a culture that did not have a commonly understood category of "a religion," with the associated coherence of religious practices and beliefs. While discussing in detail the variety of conceptions of the divine, as well as the multiple approaches or levels through which it could be addressed, Rives endorses a singular notion of religion in which context is key in the choice of any particular religious form. Including an admirable range of evidence, from inscriptions, through texts of various kinds, to visual remains, he goes on to discuss what he sees as the three key differences between this Roman imperial and modern, Western concepts of religion: first, the absence of belief in a singular doctrinal system in Rome; secondly, their vague association of any morality with religion; and, finally, the multiple and varied sources of religious authority. Of these, the last, "authority," may appear problematic, especially given that Rives tries to reconcile the republican tradition of civic religion with the notion of a religious marketplace in the empire, but he succeeds in delivering an excellent survey of the complexities involved in any such singular model of religious authority for this period. To approach religious diversity, Chapter Two, "Regional Religious Traditions of the Empire," turns to a geographically organized overview of the empire. From classical Greek polis religion to the local cults in Asia Minor, from the aniconic cults in ancient Syria to what came to be seen by the Romans as the particularly "Egyptian" and "African" gods, and "Celtic" and "Thracian" divinities, the survey offers the insight that an ancient traveler might have had of the local religious flavors on a journey around the empire. Rives is good at pointing out the veiy diversity of religious traditions even within Italy, and how such local elements may have been important in shaping Roman priestly colleges and divinatory practices. The chapter's concluding remarks, suggesting a dynamic tension between particularization and generalization, and between continuity and change, are especially well formulated (86-87). Chapter Three, "The Presence of the Gods," offers a detailed discussion of Rives's notion of Rome as a "world full of gods": gods in nature, gods at times of need, and gods in their myriad manifestations. A particular strength of this chapter is the way in which Rives juxtaposes "pagan" and Christian experiences of the divine, offering an important contextualization of early Christianity. This juxtaposition continues in Chapter Four, "Religion and Community," in which Rives addresses the communal experience of religion. Here, as the apostle Paul addresses the citizens of Ephesus, we see not only religious traditions and practices stirred up, but also civic pride, as well as the economic BOOK REVIEWS/COMPTES RENDUS 201 interests of the city's craftsmen who live on selling cult paraphernalia. The same multiple, religious, social, and economic connections are observed in the organization of sacred space and in religious experience in general across various levels of community (the city, households, as well as voluntary associations, following a framework of Aristotle). With Chapter Five, "Religion and Empire," Rives moves to the less obvious connections among the various social and geographical divides that he has discussed earlier. The mobility of worshippers and of gods is neatly connected, and so are the multiple social and religious factors that might go into...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».