MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4206399921 · doi:10.1542/peds.106.s4.1302

Cows' Milk in Complementary Feeding

2000· article· en· W4206399921 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kim F. Michaelsen

Notice bibliographique

RevuePEDIATRICS · 2000
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueBreastfeeding Practices and Influences
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineMilk substituteBreastfeedingInfant formulaBreast milkInfant feedingRecipeToned milkBreast feedingAnimal scienceFood scienceSkimmed milkPediatricsBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

If breastfeeding is continued at a high rate into the second year of life, and if the complementary diet contains reasonable amounts of animal protein from meat, fish, or eggs, most infants will thrive without cows' milk. This is the situation in some traditional societies, where milk is not available or where there is no tradition for feeding cows' milk. However, in most populations in the world there is a strong tradition of using cows' milk as an important part of the complementary diet. This article will discuss different aspects of the use of cows' milk in complementary feeding (Table 1) and will highlight areas where there is a need for further research. The use of infant formula and follow-up formula will not be covered, despite the fact that they are usually based on cows' milk.There is universal agreement that homemade formula based on unmodified cows' milk should not be used as a breast milk substitute, especially during early infancy because the composition differs considerably from breast milk. Homemade formula is used in some populations because of economic constraints or tradition, and is less harmful than unmodified cows' milk. For this reason, the recipe for making a homemade formula is given in the recent Canadian recommendations for infant feeding1 and in the new WHO/UNICEF recommendations for infant feeding for the European Region.2 As a minimum, an iron supplement should be given as well to prevent the development of iron deficiency anemia.Because cows' milk is intended for calves, which have a much higher growth velocity than infants, the content of nutrients essential for growth, like protein and some minerals are much higher (typically 2–3 times) than in human milk. Therefore, cows' milk has a very high renal solute load that might cause dehydration and hypernatremia during illness (see the article on renal solute load by Fomon in this supplement). The high protein content will contribute considerably to the total protein intake, if milk intake is high. During the complementary feeding period, some infants have an excessive protein intake, which might have adverse effects (see article on the risks of excessive protein intake by Michaelsen in this supplement). Cows' milk also has a low content of essential fatty acids, zinc, vitamin C, and niacin and a high content of saturated fatty acids. Cows' milk has a negative effect on the iron status of the infant. The iron content is low, it is poorly absorbed, and cows' milk that has not been heat-treated, can cause gastrointestinal bleeding, especially during the first 6 months of life. There is uncertainty about how important this problem is during the last half of infancy.3,4In the United States and in the United Kingdom, it is recommended that cows' milk should not be used as the main milk drink before the age of 12 months.5,6 In Denmark7and Canada1 it is recommended that cows' milk can be introduced gradually from the age of 9 months, in Sweden8from 10 months. The main reason for delaying the introduction of cows' milk is to prevent the development of iron deficiency. Recommendations on age of introduction will have to take into account the risk of iron deficiency in the population, the iron content of the remaining diet, alternatives to cows' milk, and the amount of milk given.When is it appropriate to introduce cows' milk with a reduced fat content? In several countries the recommendation is that fat reduced milk should not be introduced during the first 2 to 3 years of life, while others recommend that semi-skimmed milk can be introduced from the age of 12 months.9 In the United Kingdom it is recommended that semi-skimmed milk (1.5–1.8 g per 1000) should not be introduced before 2 years and skimmed milk (<0.3 g) not before 5.6 There is a concern that reducing the dietary fat content might also reduce total energy intake.9,10 On the other hand, the high intake of saturated fatty acid from milk might increase cardiovascular risk. In a large study from Finland (The STRIP Baby Trial) the intervention group was recommended to use skimmed milk from the age of 7 months and to compensate the low fat intake by adding vegetable oil to the diet.11 The evidence that there are any adverse long-term effects of a high intake of milk fat in early life is, however, weak.10Some infants consume large volumes of milk, so-called milkaholics. A high milk intake leaves less room for a diversified diet and therefore increases the risk of nutritional deficiencies, especially of iron. One liter of cows' milk will cover about two-thirds of the energy requirement of a 12-month-old infant. Only few countries have recommended an upper limit to milk intake during the complementary feeding period.It has been suggested that a special milk for young children (toddlers' milk) would be beneficial. Such a milk will typically be iron-fortified, have a low protein content and have some of the milk fat exchanged with vegetable fat. There is however, no convincing evidence that such a milk would have beneficial effects, when compared with a prudent diet with a moderate amount of unmodified cows' milk and a reasonable amount of foods that are good iron sources like meat and fish.Several studies have shown that insulin-dependent diabetes is less common in infants who were breastfed than in formula-fed infants. It is not known whether the reason is a protective effect of the immune substances in breast milk or an adverse effect of cows' milk proteins.12In some populations there is a tradition of giving fermented milk, including yogurt, to infants and young children. Several resent studies have suggested beneficial (probiotic) effects of using fermented milks with a change in intestinal microflora13that might reduce the prevalence and duration of diarrhea and stimulate the immune system. There is, however, a need for more studies, before fermented milk can be recommended as a part of a complementary diet.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,184
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,304
Écart entre enseignants0,276 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations16
Publié2000
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePEDIATRICSMême sujetBreastfeeding Practices and InfluencesTravaux en français237 207