MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4206418960 · doi:10.1353/ohq.2005.0077

Judgment without Trial: Japanese American Imprisonment during World War II by Tetsuden Kashima

2005· article· en· W4206418960 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueOregon Historical Quarterly · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCuban History and Society
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésImmigrationNationalismImprisonmentAbolitionismNavyPolitical scienceHistoryNeocolonialismEconomic historyLawCriminologySociologyColonialism

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

calls the "Fraser RiverWar" between American miner-soldiers and theNlaka'pamux peoples, Daniel P.Marshall asserts that the "defining influence" in British Columbia during its for mative year of 1858 was "the extended reach of theAmerican West" (p. 65). JohnLutz shows thatbetween 1854and 1869northern aboriginal peoples defied "law, army, and navy towork, raid, and cohabit with the people of Puget Sound with relative impunity" (pp. 94-5). Ital ian immigrants also did not think of Canada or theUnited States but of VAmerica.Drawing largelyon BritishColumbian evidence, Patricia K. Wood demonstrates that family networks, mutual aid societies, and labor unions eased the trans-bordermoves of Italian immigrants who, as amarginal group, focused on neither the United Statesnor Canadian-American relations innegotiating "theirCanadian identity"(p. 117). In contrast to these accounts of people, Jeremy Mouat traces the competition of two capitalist corporations, theCanadian Pacific Railway and theGreat Northern Railroad, across a perme able border in southeastern British Columbia as he questions nationalist interpretations of Canadian history. Permeability was even truer at sea. JosephE. Taylor III argues thatdiplomats who negotiated treaties to share the salmon catch between Canadian and American fishers "hopelessly confused the biological coherence of [fisheries] management" (p. 156). These fine essays achieve theeditors' goal of exploring the impact of the border and invite more questions about borders, borderlands, and national identity. One hopes thatthisvolume, as theeditors intend, will encourage furtherinves tigation, especially byAmericans, todetermine whether thedestinies of theCanadian West and theAmerican Northwest are as parallel as the titleof thisbook proposes. Judgmentwithout Trial: Japanese American Imprisonment during World War II By Tetsuden Kashima University ofWashington Press, Seattle, 2003. Maps, tables, notes, bibliography, index. 336 pages. $35.00 cloth. Reviewed by Tim Alan Garrison Portland State University,Portland, Oregon Conventional wisdom holds that the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor insti gated an irrational overreaction by theUnited States: the federal government, pressured by politicians on the West Coast and fearing in vasion and acts of espionage, took the abrupt step of relocating and interning Japanese Americans and Japanese foreign nationals. In thismeticulous history of the bureaucracy and administration of the internment, Tet suden Kashima shows that theUnited States had programs inplace to intern individuals of Japanese ancestry long before the outbreak of war. These plans enabled federal agents tobegin arresting persons suspected of disloyalty even before the Japanese drew off from the attack. Within months, theUnited States had interned almost 120,000 people of Japanese ancestry.As many as two-thirds of the interneeswere U.S. citizens. Kashima, who was interned as a child at a camp in Topaz, Utah, maintains that the rapid implementation of the program could not have occurred without extensive prewar planning and prejudice. He demonstrates that officials throughout thefederalgovernment had 330 OHQ vol. 106, no. 2 long doubted the loyaltyof first-and second generation Japanese Americans, that these suspicions inspired national agencies todevise plans for internment in the event ofwar, and that Pearl Harbor simply set those plans into motion. In the 1920s,national securityofficials began to express concerns about the potential forespionage or subversion by Japanese immi grants.The FBI andArmy andNavy intelligence offices initiated plans to identify,assess, and imprisonpersonswho posed a threattonational security.Fear of Japanese treacherypermeated theU.S. government by the middle of the 1930s. In 1934, for example, the State Department warned that if war broke out between the United States and Japan,"the entire Japanese popula tion on thewest coast will rise and commit sabotage" (p. 16). In 1936,President Franklin D. Roosevelt suggested that intheeventofwar with the empire thenaval intelligence office should identifypeople of Japanese descent inHawaii and place them inconcentration camps. By 1941, agencieswithin theState, Justice, War, andNavy departments had collaborated ? to the extent that inter-bureaucratic cooperation ispossible ? to construct a loose but elaborate network todetain suspect characters ofGerman, Italian, and Japanese heritage. Kashima also argues thatPearl Harbor al lowed theU.S. government to radicalize this prewar program and expand itsexistingdeten tion plans to a much broader population. He rejects any suggestion that the expansion of internment was unforeseen or irrational and instead argues that after the attack theUnited States quickly seized an opportunity to "remove an undesirable ethnoracial group fromthe West Coast" (p. 130).According toKashima, a broad...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,547
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,268
Écart entre enseignants0,254 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle