Seas the day: Co‐designing immersive virtual reality exergames with exercise professionals and people living with dementia
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Physical activity (PA) is associated with physical and cognitive benefits among people living with dementia or mild cognitive impairment (PLWD/MCI) and is a meaningful activity that can improve their confidence in everyday life. Exercising in virtual reality environments (VR Exergame) is becoming an increasingly feasible and enjoyable way to promote PA and well-being in PLWD/MCI. Although co-design can significantly improve the design of technology, it is rarely done with PLWD/MCI. This study uses participatory design methods and collaborative approaches to involve key stakeholders to develop and test a VR Exergame "Seas the Day", a novel solution targeting PLWD/MCI well-being. METHODS: A multi-stage, user-centered co-design approach was used to custom-build VR Exergames tailored to the unique needs and abilities of PLWD/MCI based on a first generation of the prototype that was previously developed and tested with PLWD/MCI. This paper describes the next iteration of the prototype. Processes included concept ideation and brainstorming activities, iterative prototyping, and playtesting/input/feedback sessions with key stakeholders (PLWD/MCI, exercise professionals, engineers, VR game designers, content developers). RESULTS: The multidisciplinary and collaborative design process occurred over 15 months (overlapping with COVID-19 pandemic) with 7 PLWD/MCI (6 females; M=81.3 years) and 9 exercise professionals (7 females; M=38.1 years) to date. The game was designed to target movements identified by exercise professionals and researchers (aerobic exercises, range of motion, seated-balance, quick response to stimuli) and is structured in three exercise stages (warm-up, conditioning, cool-down). To ensure safety of participants while using VR headsets, only seated upper-limb exercises were targeted. Stakeholder feedback regarding game mechanics, aesthetics, and visual/auditory cues were gathered during brainstorming and playtesting sessions and implemented into specific game-related scenarios (tai-chi, rowing, fishing). CONCLUSION: We presented the process, outcomes, and challenges of adopting a participatory/collaborative approach with multiple stakeholder groups to co-design VR Exergames tailored to PLWD/MCI. Next steps will include a mixed-method evaluation of the VR Exergames among community-dwelling older adults and PLWD/MCI in retirement communities and long-term care to evaluate: i) feasibility and acceptability of use, ii) game user experience, iii) barriers/facilitators to uptake of VR Exergames; and iv) inform/validate VR Exergames gameplay metrics reflective of cognitive and motor performance.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».