MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4206487757 · doi:10.1353/yes.2005.0046

Women's Experience of Modernity. 1875-1945 by Ann L. Ardis , Leslie W. Lewis (review)

2005· article· en· W4206487757 sur OpenAlex
Morag Shiach

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Yearbook of English Studies · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAmerican Literature and Culture
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTrilogyArt historyHighbrowModernism (music)PortraitReputationArtStyle (visual arts)HistoryLiteratureLawPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

YES, 35, 2005 YES, 35, 2005 353 353 the United States that she had finally made her opinions about modern art accessible, so he was less successfulwith experimental texts like her TheMakingof Americans. Taking up John Dos Passos' U.S.A. trilogy after he was dropped by Harper's,Harcourtwas able to allay readers'fears about his radicalismwhilejustifying the work'sexperimentalstyle. Such experimentationwould stillhave been out of place at Scribner's,a conservativeoutfitthat only inched forwardwith its signing of F. Scott Fitzgerald. Ernest Hemingway offered the firm a new challenge: how to protect its reputation while defending his sparse style and presumed profanity. Editor Maxwell PerkinsfosteredHemingway's rugged reputation,but more importantlyhe redefinedmoralityby convincing readersthat Hemingway was only being honest in his frank reflection of the modern world. Finally, Random House rode a wave of notoriety in the 1930s by printingJoyce's Ulyssesin the United States. Because a highbrow audience had already been sated by Sylvia Beach's European edition, presumably,Bennett Cerf reached out to a middlebrowAmerican audience that he was convinced could appreciatethe book. By challengingideas about literature by marketingUlysses as a puzzle, Cerf also raisedquestionsabout the nature of reading practices, themselves. While Turner has a keen eye for the visual component of bookjacket design and advertising,she shows an even greateraptitudehere for connecting the intentionsof authorsand publishers,as revealedthroughtheir correspondence,with the advertising copy she examines.Marketing Modernism Between theTwoWorldWarsthusprovides its readerswith an excellent introductionto a whole new streamof criticaldiscourse. Turner's analysisyields a convincing portrait of publishersstrugglingto maintain balance between their twentieth-centuryprofit motive and an older booksellers' idealism. Somewhere in this clash between traditionand a changing world, writers continued to seek the legitimacy and authority bestowed by an audience's acceptance . Interestingly,in their desire to reassureconsumers that modern workswere readable, publishers may have been more interested than their authors in what happened to their books once they entered people's homes. UNIVERSITYOF LETHBRIDGE,ALBERTA CRAIG MONK Women'sExperienceof Modernity.1875-945. Ed. By ANN L. ARDISand LESLIEW. LEWIS. Baltimore, MD, and London:Johns Hopkins University Press. 2003. ix + 312 pp. i16.50. ISBN:0-8018-6935-8. This collection of sixteen essays aims to extend and to diversify analysis of the nature and experience of 'modernity'.The volume can be understoodas an elaborated response to Rita Felski'squestion, from TheGender ofModernity (I995), of how 'modernity'would appear differentlyif we were to put women's experiences at its centre. It is thus fittingthat it ends with an 'Afterword'in which Felskireviewsthe state of feministscholarshipon modernityand situatesthe variousessaysin relation to this largerproject. The Introductionto the volume, by Ann L. Ardis,highlightsthe contested nature of each of its key terms: 'women'; 'experience';and 'modernity'.Recent historical, sociological, and literaryscholarshipis cited to indicate the basic instabilityof these terms, as well as their tendency to solidify contingent historicaljudgements, and thus to lend them the allureof unarguabletruths.This theoreticalscrupulousnessis the United States that she had finally made her opinions about modern art accessible, so he was less successfulwith experimental texts like her TheMakingof Americans. Taking up John Dos Passos' U.S.A. trilogy after he was dropped by Harper's,Harcourtwas able to allay readers'fears about his radicalismwhilejustifying the work'sexperimentalstyle. Such experimentationwould stillhave been out of place at Scribner's,a conservativeoutfitthat only inched forwardwith its signing of F. Scott Fitzgerald. Ernest Hemingway offered the firm a new challenge: how to protect its reputation while defending his sparse style and presumed profanity. Editor Maxwell PerkinsfosteredHemingway's rugged reputation,but more importantlyhe redefinedmoralityby convincing readersthat Hemingway was only being honest in his frank reflection of the modern world. Finally, Random House rode a wave of notoriety in the 1930s by printingJoyce's Ulyssesin the United States. Because a highbrow audience had already been sated by Sylvia Beach's European edition, presumably,Bennett Cerf reached out to a middlebrowAmerican audience that he was convinced could appreciatethe book. By challengingideas about literature by marketingUlysses as a puzzle, Cerf also raisedquestionsabout the nature of reading practices, themselves. While Turner has a keen eye for the visual component of bookjacket design and advertising,she shows an even greateraptitudehere for connecting the intentionsof authorsand publishers,as revealedthroughtheir correspondence,with the advertising copy she examines...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,861
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,566

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,024
Tête enseignante GPT0,251
Écart entre enseignants0,226 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle