MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4206498496 · doi:10.1353/ohq.2012.0056

Up the Capitol Steps: A Woman's March to the Governorship by Barbara Roberts

2012· article· en· W4206498496 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueOregon Historical Quarterly · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueLatin American and Latino Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAsidePopulationState (computer science)Power (physics)Diversity (politics)HistoryGenealogyRest (music)SociologyGender studiesLawPolitical scienceDemographyLiteratureArtMedicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

 Reviews of available statistics, as flawed or incomplete as they may be, would at least serve as an indicator of the early Latino presence in the state. Perhaps because of the problems finding data,the writers turn to extrapolating national trends and histories of Mexicans and Mexican Americans in other regions of the United States to Oregon. While these histories may be relevanttoOregon ’smexicanos,explicitorimplied connections are difficult to confirm with the historical sources mentioned in the book. By far the strongest sections of the book are their coverage of mexicanos since the 1980s and the oral histories collected by the authors; although a bit more background on the informants interviewed for these chapters and the testimonios would be helpful. It is not always clear, for example, what specific years or time periods are being described. Still, the power and detail of these insights are illuminating and often quite moving. They help humanize a population that is often invisible or, when noticed, is seen as a cultural and economic threat to the rest of state. The anthropological and sociological details of contemporary mexicano life in the later chapters are also quite detailed and, in many ways, more relevant for understanding the present and future presence of mexicanos in Oregon. An expansion of these sections would have made for a more focused study. Those shortcomings aside,this is a welcome addition to the growing number of works on Oregon’s cultural diversity. The authors provide a good introductory history, and a vivid portrayal, of some of Oregon’s newest and oldest immigrants: los mexicanos. Jorge Guadalupe Lizárraga Washington State University, Vancouver Up the Capitol Steps: A Woman’s March to the Governorship by Barbara Roberts Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, 2011. Photographs, notes, index. 448 pages. $24.95 paper. One can easily imagine Oregon leaders — past, present, and hopefuls — eagerly snatching up copies of former Gov. Barbara Roberts’s engaging memoir to see how they fare. To do so, however, would be to miss a much larger and more important story.Roberts has crafted a fascinating glimpse into her personal life, Oregon politics, and the inextricable link between the two. According to her work, Roberts came from humble beginnings. The daughter of a millworker , she followed the path of many women of her time:an early marriage with no thoughts of being anything beyond wife and mother. After experiencing dismay and outrage at the limited resources available for her autistic son, Roberts began lobbying for children’s services. This set her on a personal and professional trajectory that ultimately led to her march up the Capitol steps as Oregon’s first woman governor . In between, she struggles with divorce, falls in love with and marries her legislator and mentor, Frank Roberts, and wins election to a succession of political positions such as school board member, county commissioner, state representative,and Secretary of State.She documents each juncture with rich details of her victories, trials, and disappointments. Her memoir is at its best when Roberts discusses her campaigns. Although everyone knows the outcome of her gubernatorial battle with David Frohnmayer and some pesky lesserknowns , for instance, few may recall Roberts’s initial underdog status in that contest. Thankfully , she provides a page-turning, almost dayby -day account of the intricacies of her race for the governorship,complete with a cast of colorful characters including supporters, detractors, andoperatives.Initialpollingnumbersrevealed Frohnmayer held a significant lead in popularPurchase back issues of the Quarterly. Call 503.306.5230 or send an e-mail to museumstore@ohs.org.  OHQ vol. 113, no. 2 ity and fundraising. She explains how she narrowed and ultimately overcame Frohnmayer’s advantage. When the polls finally closed on November 6, 1990, Roberts had secured a slim winoverFrohnmayerandthird-partycandidate AlMobley.AsRobertssteppeduptothepodium to claim victory,she bubbled,“You’re looking at thehappiestcandidateyou’veeverseen!”(p.211). In reality, it was the best of times and the worst of times for Roberts.Her father had died during her campaign, her husband’s health was failing, and she took office at the same time voters passed Ballot Measure 5, which significantly limited property-tax revenue, forcing drastic cuts in state services. Although Roberts discusses her many...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,837
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,994

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,274
Écart entre enseignants0,254 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle