Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Don’t touch that! What glove size are you? Watch your hands. My hands are well traveled by now—a year of clerkship puts a lot of experience in your hands. I’ve sutured lacerations on the belligerently inebriated. I’ve held the hands of grannies as they climbed onto the examination table. Many, many babies have gripped my index finger. I’ve palpated lymph nodes, cervixes, and prostates across the province. I know how to hold my stethoscope properly, like an internist. I don’t think I really thought about how much of medicine involves hands until my surgery rotation during clerkship. It seems obvious—tying, suturing, and cutting are clearly all about manual dexterity. They are skills that are taught and practiced, but it is more than that. During one of my days on thoracic surgery, we brought a young man into the operating room whose stomach contents were coming out of his chest tube. My job for the next four hours was to retract his heart for the surgeons. The flexible strength and elasticity of this organ was palpable through the metal retractor I held, and the patient’s life beat through my body. It was an incredible moment. Never had life been so clear to me as when the surgeon took a break and put my hand on our patient’s pericardium. I felt my pulse and his heart. Our rhythms were not in sync but we were the same—we were both alive. It was a grueling surgery, but it was amazing. The surgeon fixed the esophagus and stomach, and the patient lived. During one of my nights on general surgery, we brought another young man into the operating room. He had been absolutely fine three weeks ago, when he suddenly couldn’t keep anything down. The small bowel obstruction we saw on X-ray became something even worse on CT—cancer, likely pancreatic. No warning of painless jaundice. No weight loss. Maybe some night sweats. My job for the next four hours was to retract part of the intestine while the surgeon did a roux-en-Y gastric bypass to buy this gentleman some time and some quality of life. Partway through, the surgeon placed my hand on our patient’s intestine. It was hard and lumpy. The texture was all wrong. He let me run my hands along the length of our patient’s bowel with him—parts of it felt grainy and rough. We spent most of the operation in silence. It was cold and late. And we weren’t going to save him—help him but not save him. In surgery, my hands held life and death. I’ve held the strange weight of a leg as you hand it over to the nurse during an amputation. I’ve felt the unbelievable stretch of a skin graft as the surgeon staples it over a massive burn and the rush of air around my index finger as I clear the opening for a chest tube. I’ve understood the sorrow of the abnormal strength in a young trauma patient’s grip who has just earned the label of C6 quad. I’ve given my pen to the attending to sign a death certificate. My hands have changed and so have I along with them. I know who I am as a person, and I’m finding out who I might be as a physician, with a growing confidence in my abilities. My hands are the entryway, from the very first handshake with a patient, and they are one of the tools I am learning to use to connect with and care for my patients. My hands are a part of me and of my presence in medicine. Scrub in. Can you feel that? Hold this for me. Acknowledgments: A sincere thank you to Dr. Jonathan White of the University of Alberta Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry for encouraging the practice of reflection during the surgical clerkship rotation.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».