MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4206600804 · doi:10.1162/jcws_r_01062

Teaching Anticommunism: Fred Schwarz and American Postwar Conservatism

2022· article· en· W4206600804 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Cold War Studies · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAmerican Political and Social Dynamics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCommunismOpposition (politics)PoliticsPolitics of the United StatesPopulationConservatismGrassrootsPolitical scienceEconomic historyLawPolitical economyHistorySociologyDemography

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The membership of the Communist Party of the United States (CPUSA) never reached 100,000 at any one time, but the party nonetheless has attracted an extraordinary amount of scholarly attention over the years. Hundreds of books and thousands of articles have been devoted to the CPUSA's activities. No political movement in U.S. history has been the subject of such frequent congressional investigations and hearings or faced more sustained attack by government agencies. The opposition to Communism during the Cold War was, arguably, more widespread and intense than Communism itself.One portion of this deep-seated anti-Communism has obsessed scholars. Senator Joseph McCarthy leaped into national prominence in 1950 when he launched an attack on Communists in government. Just four years later, he was censured by his Senate colleagues. The McCarthy phenomenon—and studies of his alleged precursors and aiders and abettors (Martin Dies, J. Edgar Hoover, the House Un-American Affairs Committee)—have been hardy perennials of scholarship on twentieth-century U.S. history.Far less attention has been given to the study of grassroots anti-Communism in the United States. Although scores of groups devoted to fighting Communism or exposing its evils and combatting its efforts were present in many nooks and corners of the United States, very few have received academic attention. Many were ephemeral, left meager records, and were either run by or attracted numerous crackpots. But others reinforced or reinvigorated conservative, traditionalist, and religious segments of the population whose aversion to Communism ran deep.Hubert Villeneuve, an independent scholar based in Canada, has refashioned his doctoral dissertation on one of the most influential movements, the Christian Anti-Communism Crusade (CACC) and its founder and most recognizable figure, Fred Schwarz, to produce a sober, detailed, and fair-minded portrait of an organization that attracted wealthy donors, numerous public figures, and thousands of middle-class, religious Americans to combat the Communist menace.Schwarz was an unlikely icon for what became the most successful grassroots conservative organization in the United States in the late 1950s and early 1960s. Born in Australia in 1913, he came from a poor family. His father, born Jewish in Austria, had converted to evangelical Christianity as a young man and fathered eleven children. Fred earned a bachelor's degree in science and eventually completed medical school, where he had numerous run-ins with Communists over their atheism. Determined to understand the doctrine, he carefully read Communist classics and won renown for forcefully challenging them in debates. Coming to the attention of ultra-orthodox Protestants in the United States, he was persuaded to come to the country in 1950 to deliver a series of lectures. He immediately became a hit and embarked on an exhausting schedule that had him speaking to as many as five audiences a day. His natural constituency was churches, but he quickly expanded to civic groups, conservative organizations, high schools, and military audiences. The Korean War, revelations about widespread Soviet espionage, and the rise of Joseph McCarthy had stoked anti-Communist sentiment in the United States. Schwarz's blend of expertise about Communism, humor, and avoidance of hysteria gave him credibility.Schwarz never became a U.S. citizen and carefully avoided partisan issues in order to preserve his organization's tax-exempt status. He was aware that large numbers of those who came to his lectures were supportive of McCarthyism, so he tiptoed around the issue, careful to avoid endorsing the senator's wildest charges against individuals. Although Schwarz's “Crusades,” modeled on those led by the evangelist Billy Graham, drew significant donations from local figures in the cities where they were held, he also gained financial support from a national network of wealthy conservative donors including the Pew and Bradley Foundations, Walter Knott of Knott's Berry Farm fame, and Alfred Kohlberg. Their contributions enabled Schwarz, headquartered in Long Beach, California, to mount weeklong schools around the country, where speakers included Herbert Philbrick and Congressman Walter Judd, as well as cameo appearances by such Hollywood stars as Roy Rogers, Dale Evans, George Murphy, and Ronald Reagan. One of Schwarz's early mainstays, W. Cleon Skousen, was quietly eased out because of his extreme conspiratorial theories.Unlike some other grassroots anti-Communist groups, Schwarz avoided both anti-Semitism and racism. He did not attack the civil rights movement as Communist-dominated. Although Schwarz was critical of urban rioting in the 1960s, he also condemned racism. Very few of his Crusades took place in the Deep South. Several of his allies, including Kohlberg and Marvin Liebman, his public relations expert, were Jewish. Villeneuve demonstrates that attacks accusing Schwarz of anti-Semitism by such prominent organizations as the Anti-Defamation League were inaccurate.Despite Schwarz's efforts to avoid identification with more extreme anti-Communist organizations, he eventually lost his footing with the increasing prominence of the John Birch Society (JBS). Privately, he was critical of the secretive, hierarchical, and “fascist” organization led by Robert Welch, but he refrained from an all-out assault, for fear it would antagonize many of his supporters and funders. When Schwarz publicly ridiculed Welch's characterization of Dwight Eisenhower as a Communist, Welch accused him of splitting the anti-Communist movement and gloated that the CACC had served as a recruiter for the JBS. As fears about a surge in far-right activity spiked in the early 1960s, liberals launched attacks on the CACC as a JBS offshoot, many organizations began to distance themselves from Schwarz, the Internal Revenue Service and other government agencies began to cause problems, and financial support began to wither. By the 1970s health problems had limited Schwarz's role. He lived to see his one-time close ally Ronald Reagan win the presidency and the collapse of Communism before dying in 2009, but the CACC had long since faded into irrelevance.Villeneuve's book provides as thorough an accounting of the CACC's successes and failures as we will ever need and suggests the ways the organization foreshadowed the rise of the “new right” of the 1980s. At times the book's relentless compilation of Schwarz's numerous lectures and crusades becomes tedious, but overall it is a useful book.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,843
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,033
Tête enseignante GPT0,283
Écart entre enseignants0,250 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle