MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4206612835 · doi:10.1353/phx.2020.0018

The Sarpedon Krater: The Life and Afterlife of a Greek Vase by Nigel Spivey

2020· article· en· W4206612835 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kate Cooper

Notice bibliographique

RevuePhoenix · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiquePublic Spaces through Art
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGraffitiHuman sexualityMasculinityPraiseSociologyElitePsychologyGender studiesArtSocial psychologyVisual artsLawPolitics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

186 PHOENIX or others. Levin-Richardson’s examination of legal texts supports such use of property among the elite as a revenue stream. The next three chapters (Six to Eight) put the evidence discussed previously to work and tease out themes already touched on. Focusing on clients, then female prostitutes, and finally male prostitutes, Levin-Richardson considers each group’s relation to the space, graffiti, objects, and each other. Her attention to multiple perspectives is a strength of the book. Like the frescoes, the graffiti mostly presents a “normative” sexuality that positions the male client as penetrator. Despite their variable status, all visitors to the brothel experienced the masculinity of free elite males by enjoying privileged lines of sight as they entered and reclining on couches to drink and have sex when inside. The graffiti reveals visitors boasting of their sexual exploits and engaging in masculine rivalry in ways that may not have been possible for all outside the walls of the brothel. At the same time, repeated names in the graffiti suggest some clients sought emotional connections with prostitutes and became regular visitors. The inclusion of prostitutes as workers and social actors is a welcome approach. Levin-Richardson uses the graffiti to showcase the emotional labour performed by prostitutes who greet and praise clients and thus foster special or long-term interactions. Viewing such relations as labour allows her to acknowledge the work prostitutes undertook to obscure their exploitation when servicing customers. The graffiti also suggests that prostitutes took on “stage names” and used these names to construct personas for themselves to please clients and transcend their circumstances. Her arguments that some of the graffiti was written by the workers themselves is surely correct and reveals prostitutes proclaiming sexual agency, expressing grief, and interacting in myriad ways with the space and clients. Such graffiti challenge us to rethink these women and men (and I dare say also children) who found ways to memorialize themselves and enact agency even as they were exploited. These chapters also consider male versus female sexual labour. In sum, Levin-Richardson pushes the boundaries of the evidence in productive ways. Her approach constitutes a gold standard in the examination of “marginal” individuals for acknowledging the complexity of their experiences and not confining them to Roman discourses of power. Beautifully produced, this new monograph will be of interest to both experts and novices, within and outside the field of classics. The accessible style is handled with balance so that both equally benefit and remain engaged. Brock University Allison Glazebrook The Sarpedon Krater: The Life and Afterlife of a Greek Vase. By Nigel Spivey. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 2019. Pp. 256, 3 plates, 78 figs. Spivey's treatment of the “Sarpedon krater,” an Athenian red-figure vase painted by Euphronios in the late sixth century b.c., is a wide-ranging discussion of the krater’s original use in ancient Greece and Etruria, its artistic legacy in the Roman and Renaissance worlds, and the present-day issues of archaeological looting and museum collecting in Italy and the United States. Chapter One is a very brief preface to the book that begins : “As vases go, the Sarpedon krater is relatively large. As landmarks go, it is almost BOOK REVIEWS/COMPTES RENDUS 187 ridiculously small . . .” (10). This curious opening is due to the fact that the book was first published in 2018 in the “Landmarks Library” and therefore Spivey must justify the inclusion of a single, albeit exceptional, vase in this series. He does so with an in-depth discussion of both the actual and symbolic value of the krater in a refreshing reminder of the importance of ancient vases, which highlights a medium that is often sidelined as being of interest only to art historians and archaeologists. Chapter Two deals with the modern value of the krater and the notorious story of its discovery and collection. Looted from an Etruscan grave by tombaroli, the krater was sold, with a fictional provenance, by the unscrupulous art dealers Giacomo Medici and Robert Hecht to the Metropolitan Museum of Art in 1972 for the record price of $1,000,000. Although the buyers suspected that the vase had been...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,301
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,379

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,275
Écart entre enseignants0,253 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePhoenixMême sujetPublic Spaces through ArtTravaux en français237 207