Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This issue, the fifth of the Journal of the Ambulatory Pediatric Association, covers the breadth of Association interests and investigation, from controlled clinical trials to educational research to child health policy. Pamela High and associates (Hasbro Children's Hospital and Brown University) describe an important randomized trial of a simple reading enhancement program in primary care practice, demonstrating significant effects on reading in low-income households. Sally Longstaffe and colleagues (Winnipeg) demonstrate improvements in self-concept and behavior with improvements in children's enuresis. Kathi Kemper and colleagues (Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School) provide results from a survey of pain patients' experience with acupuncture and indicate promising lines for future research. John Knight and associates (also Boston Children's Hospital) provide systematic evaluation of a short screening test for substance abuse in adolescents. Marion Sills and colleagues (Denver Children's Hospital and University of Colorado) find relatively limited knowledge of postcoital contraception methods among physicians working with sexually active adolescents. Jerry Rushton and colleagues (currently Children's Hospital of Michigan; work performed at the University of North Carolina) note important limitations in the knowledge and performance of primary care physicians in the management of childhood depression. Mark Wolraich (Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt) provides perspective regarding the importance of the work of Rushton and colleagues.Four articles describe interesting and important educational findings. Associate editors Ben Siegel and Larrie Greenberg provide commentary on the paper by Joseph Lopreiato and colleagues (National Naval Medical Center and Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences), which offers clear evidence of behavior change associated with implementation of a new curriculum to address house officers' approaches to health maintenance. Lindsey Lane and Ruth Gottlieb's brief report (Jefferson Medical College) describes structured clinical observations as a teaching method, an area meriting further investigation. Judith Shaw and colleagues (Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School) demonstrate the effects of direct reminders on residents' performance of immunizations. Joel Alpert (a former APA president) and colleagues (Boston Medical Center) describe precursors of (academic) leadership in pediatrics, indicating the role of chief residency as preparation for leadership.Paul Newacheck and colleagues (University of California, San Francisco) analyze national data to characterize unmet health needs of America's children. Barbara Starfield and colleagues (Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health) provide documentation of a new measure of consumer experiences with primary care. In another article, Newacheck and colleagues describe recent efforts to expand public health insurance for children and provide guidance regarding issues in monitoring these expansions.In its issues so far, the Journal has described several important and successful educational interventions in pediatrics, providing more attention to this area of child health professional development than our colleague journals. Similarly, our attention to methodology in child health research will provide investigators with substantive guidance in variable choice and definition and strengthen consistency in general pediatric research. Other manuscripts published cover multiple areas of general pediatrics, including early childhood issues, reading, and adolescence, as well as key work in child health services research and child health policy. We look forward to your continuing support of the Association's Journal.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,031 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,020 | 0,020 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,044 | 0,028 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».