The Science of Roman History: Biology, Climate, and the Future of the Roman Past by Walter Scheidel
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
176 PHOENIX finesse of Schlapbach’s philological reading, as well as her capacity to situate each passage within a broader cultural, literary, and philosophical tradition, without overlooking the aesthetic possibilities of dance analysis. Chapter Four (“[Perceived] Authenticity and the Physical Presence,” 169–200) explores aspects of credibility and visual impression associated with dance re-enactments in Xenophon’s Symposium and in Greek and Roman epigrams from the imperial period. Here the balance between accuracy—that is, the dancer’s excessively literal portrayal of a myth or a character—and lack of art reminds us of the aesthetic principles of pantomime as a quintessentially representational art form. Chapter Five (“Dance and Interpretation in Longus and Apuleius,” 201–249) shows how the ancient novel continues Platonic reflections on mimesis. Particularly interesting in this chapter is the idea that dance may shape social roles by grafting mythical patterns onto reality, a process that Schlapbach investigates through Daphnis and Chloe’s pastoral pantomime in Longus’ Book 2. The final chapter of this section (Chapter Six, “Elusive Dancers and the Limits of Art in Nonnus ’ Dionysiaka,” 251–281) exemplifies the essence of Schlapbach’s whole book by showing the relevance of dance as an inspirational force also in the Christian environment of Nonnus’ Dionysiaka. Here, the author reads the epic through a multimedia analysis and recognizes dance as a way for the poem to draw attention to itself. The most remarkable contribution of this chapter is Schlapbach’s identification of non-representational dance as an aesthetic paradigm, of significance to the poet’s imaginary as the most traditional and purely mimetic forms of dance. Thus, in a section that describes the transformation of a mythical dancer into a river, Schlapbach foregrounds the corporeal and the essentially formal in order to elaborate on the interpretative possibilities of these kinds of performances , their “self-sufficient” nature, and their artistic appeal. Suddenly at this point we understand the importance of the book’s unusual jacket photograph, for it is this ideal of pure movement and its physical dimension—what Cunningham so brilliantly extricated from the practice and experience of dance—that Schlapbach seeks to recast. The book then concludes with a brief theoretical epilogue (283–288) and a thorough bibliography (289–328) that reflects the rigor of the author’s multifaceted and impressively multilingual academic profile. As a whole, The Anatomy of Dance Discourse provides the reader with an immersive experience in the dynamic world of body movement, in no small measure thanks to Schlapbach’s fluid writing style and her willingness to summarize and rethink each idea in useful Protean ways. With this monograph, we are invited to evaluate the significance of dance in antiquity as more than an isolated art form and to acknowledge the manysided effects of this cultural reality. The overarching discourse of ancient dance has only just started to permeate the field. Universidad Aut onoma de Madrid Zoa Alonso Fern andez The Science of Roman History: Biology, Climate, and the Future of the Roman Past. Edited by Walter Scheidel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 2018. Pp. xvi, 259. This book, edited by Walter Scheidel, presents different scientific approaches relevant to the Roman past. Rather than forming a handbook or a manual on the historical applications of science, the contributions are united instead around their focus on what BOOK REVIEWS/COMPTES RENDUS 177 new light each approach might shed on historical inquiry. The whole thus functions as an invitation for Romanists to engage with new scientific methodologies and findings. There can be no denying the possibilities on display here for expanding the horizons of our understanding of the ancient world. Anyone whose work crosses into the field of Roman social and economic history will find value in this book, and many readers are likely to come away with new ideas for research projects. As the authors of one chapter note (154), ancient historians have largely stayed on the sidelines while scientific techniques are increasingly incorporated into the historical study of other periods of the past. Such lack of interest might be attributed to our familiarity with using more conventional source materials. What has changed in recent years is not the value of this existing...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle