P258 Impact of inflammatory bowel diseases on the phenotype and severity of primary sclerosing cholangitis - a systematic review with meta-analysis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Data regarding the impact of co-occurring inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) on the phenotype and severity of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) are emerging. The purpose of our study was to characterize the phenotype and disease course of PSC in relation to co-occurring IBD. Methods The purpose of our study was to characterize the phenotype and disease course of PSC in relation to co-occurring IBD. The systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to Cochrane’s recommendations. PubMed and EMBASE were searched from database inception till January 2020 for studies reporting disease phenotype and severity of PSC in association with co-occurrence of IBD. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model. The quality of the studies was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Results The electronic search yielded 12,220 studies which were narrowed down to 132 after screening based on study titles and abstracts. Of these, a full-text review identified 42 eligible studies, including a total of 8,081 and 5,728 patients with PSC and with or without co-occurring IBD, respectively (Figure 1). The mean NOS score was 6.4 ad included 23 (54.8%) and 18 (42.9%) studies of moderate and high methodological quality, respectively. The meta-analysis demonstrated that co-occurrence of IBD was associated with significantly less frequent involvement of the extra-hepatic ducts (risk ratio (RR)=0.50 (95% CI 0.33–0.75), p<0.01, I2=0%) as compared with patients without co-occurring IBD. However, IBD-PSC and PSC without IBD had similar rate of small-duct PSC, histologic stages of PSC, risk of developing cirrhosis, and features of decompensation. Furthermore, in comparison to patients with isolated PSC, co-occurring IBD was associated with an increased overall risk of malignancies (RR=1.53 (95% CI 1.01–2.32), p=0.04, I2=46%), which was ascribed to colorectal cancers (RR=4.77 (95% CI 2.50–9.09), p<0.01, I2=0%) and not cholangiocarcinomas (RR=0.88 (95% CI 0.59–1.31), p=0.54, I2=31%), gallbladder cancers (RR=2.28 (95% CI 0.39–13.21), p=0.36, I2=0%), or hepatocellular carcinomas (RR=4.49 (95% CI 0.57–35.46), p=0.15, I2=0%). Regarding long-term PSC outcomes, having IBD was not associated with the need of liver transplantation (RR=0.84 (95% CI 0.50–1.41), p=0.52, I2=60%) or mortality (RR=0.74 (95% CI 0.37–1.50), p=0.40, I2=37%), but was associated with a longer liver transplantation-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.70 (95% CI 0.60–0.82), p<0.01, I2=5%). Conclusion This systematic review with meta-analysis suggests that IBD is associated with a distinct phenotype and course of PSC, thus emphasizing the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to patients with co-occurring PSC and IBD.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,016 | 0,043 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,018 | 0,034 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,010 | 0,013 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».