P585 Examining faecal incontinence and its impact on health-related quality of life in patients with Crohn’s perianal fistulas: results from a multi-country burden of illness study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Perianal fistulas (PAF) are a common complication associated with Crohn’s disease (CD), and patients with Crohn’s perianal fistulas (CPF) are more likely to experience faecal incontinence (FI) than patients with CD without PAF (non-PAF CD). A global study was conducted to assess the burden of illness in patients with CPF compared with patients with non-PAF CD. Here, we present data on the level of FI and its impact on quality of life (QoL). Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted in seven countries (France, Germany, Spain, UK, Canada, Australia and Japan) in patients aged ≥21 and ≤90 years with self-reported physician-diagnosed CD. Patients were classified as having non-PAF CD (cohort 1) or CPF without PAF-related surgery (cohort 2) or CPF with PAF-related surgery (cohort 3). Validated, general and disease-specific patient-reported outcome data were collected using a 45-min IRB/EC-approved web-enabled questionnaire. The level of FI was evaluated using the Revised Faecal Incontinence Score (RFIS) (1–20 scale, 0 = no incontinence, 4-week recall period) and the impact of FI on QoL in patients who had experienced FI using the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQL) (1–5 scale, 1 = lower QoL). Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Results Of the 929 patients recruited (cohort 1, n = 620; cohort 2, n = 174; cohort 3, n = 135), 58–69% were male and 55–67% were aged 21–40 years across all cohorts. A significantly higher proportion of patients in cohort 3 than cohort 1 had severe Crohn’s disease as classified by a physician (18% vs 9%, respectively; p < 0.05). Overall, 47% of patients reported experiencing FI and completed both the RFIS and FIQL. Significantly higher proportions of patients in cohorts 2 and 3 had experienced FI than in cohort 1 (59% and 59% vs 40%, respectively; p < 0.05), and a significantly higher proportion were currently experiencing FI in cohort 3 than in cohorts 1 and 2 (69% vs 37% and 45%, respectively; p < 0.05). Mean RFIS scores were significantly higher (worse) in cohorts 2 and 3 than cohort 1 (9.5 [p < 0.05] and 10.6 [p < 0.001] vs 8.2, respectively). Patients in cohort 2 had significantly lower (worse) FIQL scores than those in cohort 1 across three FIQL domains (lifestyle [2.2 vs 2.4], depression/self-perception [2.1 vs 2.3], embarrassment [2.2 vs 2.4]; p < 0.05), whereas patients in cohort 3 only reported significantly lower FIQL scores compared with cohort 1 in the embarrassment domain (2.2 vs 2.4; p < 0.05). Conclusion In this study almost half of the patients experienced faecal incontinence. Among those who experienced faecal incontinence, patients with PAF experienced a significantly higher impact on their quality of life compared with patients without PAF.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».