P338 Early proactive drug monitoring strategy of infliximab as monotherapy for inflammatory bowel disease in paediatric patients is associated with good sustained clinical remission
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Monotherapy with infliximab (IFX) could be as efficient as combotherapy with immunomodulators in the treatment and maintenance of remission for children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) if a proactive therapeutic drug monitoring strategy is adequately performed. This strategy may allow optimization of blood levels of IFX in order to obtain a sustained clinical response. Methods A retrospective study was conducted amongst children with IBD, aged from, 2 to, 18 years old and diagnosed between January, 2018 and June, 2020. All patients were treated with IFX less than, 30 days after diagnosis. Data concerning disease activity was collected at diagnosis, at one year after diagnosis. Close monitoring of IFX blood levels were collected before the third and fourth dose and regularly thereafter. Adjustments in IFX dose per infusion were made according to blood levels and clinical response. The primary outcome was clinical remission, defined by a PUCAI or shortPCDAI score <, 10 without the need of corticosteroid, at one year after diagnosis. The secondary outcomes measured were the median (interquartile range (IQR)) dose of IFX (in mg/kg) after a year of treatment, the median (IQR) number of changes of IFX dose, the time intervals between IFX infusions over a year, and the median (IQR) number of blood levels of IFX done in a year. Results A total of, 91 patients were included (81% Crohn’s disease; mean age at diagnosis was, 13.2 years (IQR = 11.3 to, 15.15)). After one year of treatment, 76 patients (83.5%) reached clinical remission. IFX was discontinued in, 13 patients:, 6 due to antibody occurrence, 5 because of treatment failure, 1 due to psoriasis and, 1 due to autoimmune hepatitis. In total, 61.5% of patients needed two or more IFX dose/interval optimization over the course of a year. At one year after diagnosis, the median IFX dose per infusion was, 8.78 mg/kg (IQR = 7.5 mg/kg to, 9.9 mg/kg) with infusions given, 6 weeks apart or less in, 82% of the patients. Patients who were diagnosed before the age of, 10 had a median IFX dose of, 9.43 mg/kg. The median number of IFX blood level dosage was, 4 per patient over a year (IQR=, 3.5 to 6). Conclusion Early treatment for IBD with IFX as monotherapy and a proactive optimization strategy is associated with a good sustained steroid free clinical remission. Most patients needed an increase of IFX dose during the first year of treatment. We therefore recommend to proactively monitor blood levels of IFX before the third and fourth dose of IFX and thereafter, in order to lower the risk of treatment failure and anti-infliximab antibodies occurrence.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».