MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4210258765 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab178

ECCO Guidelines on Therapeutics in Ulcerative Colitis: Medical Treatment

2021· article· en· W4210258765 sur OpenAlexaff
Tim Raine, Stefanos Bonovas, Johan Burisch, Torsten Kucharzik, Michel Adamina, Vito Annese, Oliver Bachmann, Dominik Bettenworth, María Chaparro, Wladyslawa Czuber‐Dochan, Piotr Eder, Pierre Ellul, Catarina Fidalgo, Gionata Fiorino, Paolo Gionchetti, Javier P. Gisbert, Hannah Gordon, Charlotte Hedin, Stefan D. Holubar, Marietta Iacucci, Konstantinos Κarmiris, Κωνσταντίνος Κατσάνος, Uri Kopylov, Péter L. Lakatos, Theodore Lytras, Ivan Lyutakov, Nurulamin M Noor, Gianluca Pellino, Daniele Piovani, Edoardo Savarino, Francesco Selvaggi, Bram Verstockt, Antonino Spinelli, Yves Panís, Glen Doherty

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueInflammatory Bowel Disease
Établissements canadiensMcGill University Health Centre
Organismes subventionnairesNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchEuropean Crohn's and Colitis Organisation
Mots-clésMedicineUlcerative colitisIntensive care medicineInfliximabInflammatory bowel diseaseInternal medicineGastroenterologyDisease

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Ulcerative colitis [UC] is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] characterised by colonic inflammation extending to a variable extent from the rectum. Care of the patient with UC requires appropriate input from across the multiprofessional team. These guidelines summarise the recommended medical treatment for adults with UC. Other ECCO guidelines consider the approach to UC diagnosis and monitoring,1–3 nursing care,4 management of disease complications,5–7 risk of infection,8 and technical aspects of surgery.9 This document was prepared as part of a process that also led to the publication of a related guideline with recommendations on the surgical care of the patients with UC and on the medical aspects of the management of the patient hospitalised with severe UC. ECCO Guidelines on Therapeutics in Ulcerative Colitis: Surgical Treatment. Patients living with UC can have a variable disease course.10 In this document, we discuss therapeutic approaches stratified by disease severity [mildly-to-moderately active and moderately-to-severely active disease]. Attempts to define disease severity are widely used in setting clinical trial inclusion criteria and can be measured according to several different definitions.11 Trial populations will inevitably vary, and we reflect the continuum of disease severity by having the moderate disease category span both broad categories. It is also important to remember that these definitions capture severity at a given point in time and may not reflect the cumulative long-term burden of disease experienced by a patient.12 It is also important to consider disease extent when planning treatment in UC, as this may affect the optimal route of drug administration. This is typically defined according to disease involving the rectum only [proctitis], disease distal to the splenic flexure [left-sided UC], or disease extending proximal to the splenic flexure [extensive UC].13 These definitions of disease extent are recognised as somewhat arbitrary; in clinical practice, topically administered therapies are often used for UC whose extent is limited to the rectum and a portion of the sigmoid colon [proctosigmoiditis], with the term ‘distal colitis’ used to describe this disease distribution. It should be remembered that disease distribution can change10,14 and that proximal disease extension can be a negative prognostic marker.15 This document was compiled following the ‘Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation’ [GRADE] methodology.16 A panel of 33 experts was selected by the Guidelines Committee of ECCO from a competitive pool of applicants and worked with a team of methodologists and librarians. All panellists received training in the GRADE methodology. Additionally, six patients with UC, representing the European Federation of Crohn’s and Colitis Associations [EFCCA], were invited to participate in all face-to-face meetings as full voting members. Two domains for the medical treatment of UC were identified and used as the basis for the following two working groups based upon disease severity: mildly-to-moderately active disease and moderately-to-severely active disease. We recognise that these divisions are somewhat arbitrary, partially overlapping, and inconsistently defined; therefore, we ensured close collaboration between the working groups to ensure that key topics were covered appropriately with the aim of providing guidance applicable across the continuum of UC severity encountered in clinical practice. Working group participants first formulated a series of specific questions using the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes [PICO] system, which were deemed to be clinically important for the medical treatment of UC. These questions were debated in a series of telephone conferences before final agreement at a meeting of the full guideline group in Vienna in November 2019. Voting on the inclusion of PICO questions was conducted, and only those achieving agreement of >80% by the panel were included in the next phase of the process. At this meeting, the panellists also ranked each outcome’s importance on a scale of 1 to 9 based on the GRADE definitions.16 Scores of 7‒9 indicated an outcome that is critical to patients for decision making; scores of 4‒6 indicated an important outcome, but not critical; and scores of 1‒3 indicated an outcome of limited importance. The panellists’ agreement on outcomes’ importance was assessed using the Disagreement Index, as described in the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method.17 The team of librarians performed a comprehensive literature search on PubMed/Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central databases, using specific search strings for each PICO question [available as Supplementary data at ECCO-JCC online]. Two working group members [one assigned to the PICO question and another from the same group as second reviewer] independently screened titles and abstracts to exclude any irrelevant reports. Subsequently, the working group members assigned to each PICO question assessed the full text of the selected publications for relevance to the specific PICO. Note that were only selected the PICO as data on at of the of for the of the In this that of a drug of were not included for not at outcome defined as of critical importance. of the the guidelines in this document from in patients with UC. The methodologists performed the The risk was used to treatment with were in with the in group of a we used a that was to the of the the we prepared and the using and We used for All are all for a and we on the in the The was based on the and the risk in the The of was using the following and each PICO we the of for each outcome, and the of across a guideline the of the extent to which the in the is to a the of the for each outcome across all we with the from as and assessed the following that to the of risk of and publication of was assessed using the Cochrane was assessed with the Cochrane a and the was according to the a different but related or outcome from the of was based on the of of was by when the of was and by two when was was assessed using and the and only were at included in the The of was a of the of across all critical for decision making; the of for any of the critical the of all used in each key data and for each outcome of and each of the of are as Supplementary with of the of We of of each of the the risk with the risk with the the and any the data in the with of the of across The of each was as that the of an the or or as that the is also the of and of between and and All recommendations were to voting by the panel the ECCO for each with six from the European of and from a of ECCO members in ECCO guideline The final of all was panel members a final meeting in and to a final recommendations were at of the panellists with the and The of text and and were by the ECCO also the final of these These guidelines are to and in on the medical treatment of should not be used to a of should not be used for and should not be as the of any or All with the and publication of this guideline were by The of ECCO in the of panel members or the or of PICO A of of the key from ECCO UC guidelines is in the Supplementary These guidelines the for the of different medical therapies in the treatment of UC. were and in a by the which were typically from clinical and based upon of an the medical care of a patient with UC the between a given drug and patients encountered in the not the of a given clinical trial It is important that these guidelines are used first to the of the of any given which the with the in a treatment A key of is when to is in UC in Crohn’s disease on the importance of treatment At the same the of can to and as can to the of an is a in the GRADE process when the of as guidelines will be that this document can not is that appropriate and of patients for is critical to optimal The of treatment in UC is to of and is important to not only of clinical but also as this is with long-term The importance of these was in the decision by the panel to and clinical as of critical importance. The term widely used in the to as and from therapies and This is somewhat as the of and to therapies with the of and are as a part of UC the of this we to the term as in the of any widely also the of this specific definitions of have used in these are in the for of the we typically in a both for patients disease or in appropriate or can a in clinical practice, are trial data in this and are to several of this we have recommendations to the in a in clinical In to the and of medical for UC, and when to consider or treatment to the and burden to patients of drug is an important The limited on treatment and is the of this We at a of to in patients with mildly-to-moderately active UC of We performed a of with a of patients for a in achieving clinical the clinical in at was for with in of patients with of those The of on as in with patients was with was The in with patients for a of was in the The of was as to and publication and for as Supplementary data at ECCO-JCC online]. A Cochrane the of or across This not any in between different of of colonic distribution of different in were in any this patients with active UC to with appropriately are to upon to an The same Cochrane not for of across when with of the same of the a of of a of with in patients with active disease or in those with treatment with or UC a of data also of in the group in the In according to disease severity not any in between and in of a We at a of for the of in active distal colitis We identified that assessed a of for which we used for as Supplementary data at ECCO-JCC All of inflammation but in the proximal of disease extent a of from the to was a in clinical and clinical when with patients and In in that assessed 1 for as in distal was in patients with those with in between treatment and were the of was as is the clinical and related to administration. We the of with for of in patients with active UC of at extent a were that the of with as for of in patients with active UC as Supplementary data at ECCO-JCC In all of these the of with the of this the of is Two these two therapeutic for clinical in patients with disease of at The were in of of clinical and of clinical In the of in clinical was is to in clinical in active These included patients and treatment was All were in of patient criteria used to define disease and and was a of and a risk of as the of and were in of The of clinical between and treatment was was only trial on the of on of Patients of of those with of the was not The of for this outcome was of assessed of the outcome of which was an and in the It is to the of treatment only trial this with were patients in the treatment group and patients in the group experienced In to this was also a risk of the of the data for this outcome was assessed to be we that the for clinical and the and risk of the all a in of in patients for was We using for the of in patients with active distal colitis The of topically administered for the of in patients with and distal the of a treatment with may be by patients to the route of administration. have on this but included all of the that was identified we performed a of that with as Supplementary data at ECCO-JCC were to in of clinical clinical and not with The of patients included in each was and the of was This was to and identified for the outcome critical outcome, critical were to have we that the with in clinical practice, the between and was in between and the of as an for of in patients with active UC. We treatment with for of in patients with active distal UC of The of treatment with at a or or for of in patients with active distal UC in We performed a of these which included a of patients with at or or with at as Supplementary data at ECCO-JCC online]. were for the of clinical but were not in clinical In patients for was to be with or In the of not between or the of was as patients should be with a is to that and may be of This may be appropriate for patients to to It is also important to be of between in of and all of which may have in patient It is appropriate to a patient a trial of an are to an We the of for of in patients with active UC of The of treatment with using 9 for of in patients with active UC in as Supplementary data at ECCO-JCC online]. A of patients with were included and for were to in clinical and clinical and In two patients for was to be with in with In all the of and of any not between and and The of in a of for this critical to A of data from both phase a clinical and of for 9 for of these data that this was in patients with the between drug and was not in those with disease. data for the of as a This that the appropriate of may be in patients with mildly-to-moderately active disease are not to or are to 9 with in patients with mildly-to-moderately active UC a in the of clinical and and in the treatment We the of as for the of in patients with active UC of Two have on the of as with for of in patients with only patients in two were and assessed for clinical with given a of We performed a of these and not a between and for of clinical as Supplementary data at ECCO-JCC online]. data on clinical or were It should be that to the of of may be appropriate to in patients with active disease with is but only when given an We not any using or for the of to related of we the of in of across the We the of at a for of in UC patients of We identified two involving participants with of which to PICO We these in a as Supplementary data at ECCO-JCC online]. clinical was that was to for in patients with UC was the of but this not for with was with the of was to be to with data for we appropriate to a given the and of this may be the of this inconsistently in the literature and may reflect in We the of for the of in patients with distal UC We identified that assessed as in patients with distal UC or as Supplementary data at ECCO-JCC used between 1 and 1 administered as or a of to [one The of was as a to risk of and The same were identified in a Cochrane The of as in patients with distal UC or was in of clinical with the of data on the of in distal UC or are for patients the of was to These not data on A Cochrane in the of patients or in the of to with with the of is is based on the clinical of and of of with the of this It is important to consider patient for the of the route for both in to and a of the route of may for with patients in and and may or should be We with for the of in patients with UC or are to moderate of We identified on treatment with in patients with UC were or to as Supplementary data at ECCO-JCC In patients for 1 was to for the of clinical data on or clinical or were In to clinical different disease and definitions were with and are the clinical of we not the of for of is important that any with is an We not any of but to related we across the drug with the of This is in patients of should be in this the of for the of in of to any in of clinical We for of in patients with moderately-to-severely active UC of a limited the of for the of in moderately-to-severely active UC is in clinical practice. The limited is in part to the and limited at the time of the A included only two of used we performed a of these two and an of for the of clinical The of was as to a risk of and part the of patients included in each was as Supplementary data at ECCO-JCC online]. with treatment was in these two Other the of in both and also in both UC and Crohn’s to the for of which are a outcome for we that the with in clinical and the between and used limited the of another as or as an for of in patients with moderately-to-severely active UC. these is as the of A identified six that with and a of of but with of these used a We recommendations for in active and in moderately-to-severely active UC, to reflect the populations of the identified and the in these different It is important to that are data the of as and limited data on the of these to Additionally, is with to with the of with to we of in patients with UC. should be for any patient disease or of or to Additionally, of should be to a of and with a should be for any patient requires a of in a or a disease upon We treatment with and to in patients with UC have or to We identified that with in patients with moderately-to-severely active UC as Supplementary data at ECCO-JCC an to or of which were defined as or both in also to or of of for of clinical and clinical We data for which is related to but defined from the outcome of used in this guideline was to was in of when of treatment data for from were that are not Two that performed that is to for the of clinical and The first also that is to and for of clinical and and and for of and and patients with a of of are limited data to treatment of a phase trial that the clinical of with were in patients with different from A of identified that the of when used in UC. was not to In patients with a of to or of clinical and were not are limited data on the of in A key question is to an with an The of with is data not for in with in UC, a for this and have in patients with Crohn’s patients of to a first used as and with of is in of of a to of to the second The optimal time point for the of to be in Crohn’s of used in the UC disease severe or as at first and inflammatory have to patients may from treatment the of this approach have not in any We treatment with for the of in patients with moderately-to-severely active UC have or to of Two were identified that PICO These included patients with moderately-to-severely active UC with or of clinical of clinical and were Patients were to as Supplementary data at ECCO-JCC online]. We included these two in a was often in patients with the of for clinical was the same as for clinical the between patients with and those was not of in patients with were not different from those data from also this was also for and data were of at in the phase were for patients with for patients In at in a phase not between and patients The of was The of was for clinical to and The of was moderate for clinical to The for both was to in between the two The of for was moderate to the was as the with the of in both and We treatment with to in patients with UC have or to moderate of We performed a of data from two to PICO These included patients with UC an of or were to or or a were with or as Supplementary data at ECCO-JCC was for in of clinical clinical and the was to and of on were were the was also to data are from of which should be when upon of The of an route of and the of should also be A of on data for clinical and in both the of patients to and the with were in of between these This was in the of that not of a between and or for clinical and in patients to but a or for patients with We treatment with for the of in patients with moderately-to-severely active UC with or to moderate of A with for in patients with moderately-to-severely active UC as Supplementary data at ECCO-JCC Patients were to have not to or to or as or or or have disease. of patients treatment with an treatment with both an and The the of in of clinical clinical and At of the in from was in those in those in from also a in the treatment not between and and with was for patients with and not a between and or for clinical and in patients to but a of or for patients with We or for the of in patients with UC to with the same drug We performed a of data from of for the of in patients with moderately-to-severely active UC as Supplementary data at ECCO-JCC were for the of clinical clinical in of and clinical The risk of was not different between and was also for and data were the of these In UC patients have to an is to for or the of therapeutic drug to clinical have an between of and and clinical in UC. these were all and any or a of based for of to in patients with disease of of patients with of to have that of or drug to with patients not to and to patients to to These data that by drug may be to be clinically decision but this requires in a The same and the to and not to the of of drug to in patients are not of in participants with UC, to with to at or by therapeutic drug The therapeutic drug was not to and was was a of clinical to were to drug with given the of appropriate we were to a as Supplementary data at ECCO-JCC and we in this We for of in patients with UC to with We identified that included patients with or which on of clinical and clinical in patients with moderately-to-severely active UC to as Supplementary data at ECCO-JCC Patients in these were for We performed a of from these was in received with clinical was also in patients with The of for these was moderate to The of across involving patients was not different between and The of for this outcome was moderate to from the of in a In the of in patients with UC in those with with for a both and of in patients with moderately-to-severely active UC, to and clinical were with with The was not to and all were between these two at in all and were with the We the of for the and of in patients with moderately-to-severely active colitis of the and of with those of a in patients with moderately-to-severely active UC as Supplementary data at ECCO-JCC A of patients in the group in the group clinical clinical and was a in of for clinical in a of patients in the group in the group the of for clinical was as on data and the were of and at with and with It is important to that was not with of with for both We for in patients with UC to with moderate of We identified that in patients with or as patients to at a of or was to in clinical and in patients with UC an to the the was to of clinical and in were also The clinical was also to on were for in were to The was to an risk for was of the were of and and A of the of across inflammatory a risk of This was also in a of data from the in UC were and with a This risk to be and is with A in that the of with with this risk to be in patients or in those A of in patients with and with at risk a risk of in patients with with patients with This risk was not in patients with data are in patients with risk in the UC these the European recommended using at the and as treatment for patients with risk In this UC patients with for at and in for were to with the same or to clinical were and for the and in or were between the two were in the data that is also with an risk of and we the that the in patients with with the with and of recommendations for as a treatment in patients with UC, with the and to be for each We for the of in patients with UC to with moderate of A with for in UC in patients to The that treatment with at of when with in of clinical and of clinical at data were not for we used data for the related of and with was a in for those on the The of were also by the scores in patients the not in the treatment In to the also also for clinical clinical and with were but this not The between with and were in patients with a of These recommendations summarise the on the medical management of patients with UC. were identified the of the which should be by is or is and recommendations be ECCO as or It is important that these guidelines the of and to and the and of We recognise that on care are an important in recommendations can be for patients in The recommendations should be used to treatment and part of an treatment for patients with UC, which may also and ECCO will these guidelines by ECCO and and will any to ECCO Guidelines clinical the ECCO will as a to the guideline recommendations can be clinical and patient care The important not as to for both and negative of These treatment guidelines will be according to the Committee for the of guidelines on the ECCO will the GRADE approach and consider the from clinical in the The ECCO guidelines are at care only and are based on an process. treatment are a for the and should not be based on the of the ECCO ECCO or any of members any may not be for any in in the ECCO ECCO a of of The is based on a used by the Committee of The are not only at the ECCO and the of but are also to on the ECCO providing a comprehensive of of of the We the ECCO for and for the literature and for the on and on the

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,008
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,033
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Méthodes · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,019
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,062

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0080,033
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,002
Bibliométrie0,0030,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0040,002
Science ouverte0,0030,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0090,009
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0190,017

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,310
Écart entre enseignants0,289 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreMéthodes

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1 023
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Crohn s and ColitisMême sujetInflammatory Bowel DiseaseTravaux en français237 207