MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4210420180 · doi:10.5325/utopianstudies.30.1.112

Fantastic Cities and Cabin Fever

2019· article· en· W4210420180 sur OpenAlex
Nicole Pohl

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueUtopian Studies · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueHousing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésUtopiaExhibitionReading (process)SociologyConsumerismArt historyNarrativeGentrificationAestheticsVisual artsMedia studiesAsideThe ImaginaryContemporary artHistoryArtLiteratureLawPerformance artPolitical sciencePsychoanalysisEngineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In 2015, the filmmaker, artist, and writer Penny Woolcock created an imaginary city, Utopia, at the Roundhouse, London, in collaboration with Block9. It staged a blend of miscellaneous pop-up installations featuring Londoners who were each telling their individual stories about inequality, consumerism, gentrification, education, crime, and social media.1 The narrative soundscapes set within an extraordinary design brought to light the parallel lives yet opposite experiences of people in urban environments and, at the same time, revealed their hopes and dreams.Woolcock's current exhibition at the Museum for Modern Art in Oxford, England, shows a part of this project. The video, Utopia (2015), depicts eight people from Camden, London, reading from Thomas More's Utopia with a particular emphasis on the passages on social inequality and utopian economics in Book II. The installation is a mosaic of screens showing the readers reading in close-ups, reflecting, being inspired, and being moved. This lived experience of More's text is perhaps an answer to the skepticism brought to More and to utopia in general—this is a way to activate utopia. Utopia “should be an expansive ‘living room,’ inviting us to consider the basics of ‘what if’ and ‘what ought’ from many different angles.”2 If the living room becomes the gallery, museum, or any public space, even better.A very different reflection on utopia was offered in the exhibition Cabin Fever, shown at the Vancouver Art Gallery, British Columbia. It presented an architectural, historical, and cultural survey of the cabin in North America, curated wonderfully by Jennifer M. Volland and the gallery's curators, Bruce Grenville and Stephanie Rebick. It featured installations, objects, architectural drawings, videos, photography, and my favorite, a display of “Cabin Porn” consumer goods such as flannel shirts, metal cups and saucers, and designer wood tools, all serving to create an “aesthetics of ruggedness.”On the one hand, nostalgic manifestations of homesteads, Thoreau's log cabin, postwar mass culture vacation cabins, and counterculture geodesic domes drew on cabins as the original places of shelter. The section on utopia explored the cabin as an ideal retreat à la Walden, to disengage from mainstream society and live a simple life.3On the other hand, it drew on the idiomatic term so wonderfully described by Bower in 1916: “The mind fed too long upon monotony succumbs to the insidious mental ailment which the West calls ‘cabin fever.’”4 Popular culture turned cabins into standard horror settings, as in The Cabin in the Woods (2012), The Evil Dead (1981), or Antichrist (2009), which visitors could experience in a montage of a cabin horror film as part of the exhibition. Equally uncanny, if not dystopian, was Liz Magor's (1996–2002) re-creation of a survivalist's cabin, stocked with weapons, canned goods, and other necessaries.Architectural plans, models, and photographs reminded visitors that log cabins were originally modeled on indigenous buildings, such as pit houses and Indian lodges. North American models were reflected in and influenced by European immigrants’ traditions of the dacha, Swiss chalets, the Irish stone cottage, and the Norwegian hytte and were created initially, at least, as pragmatic and quick solutions to the need for shelter. When settled, pioneers expanded their dwellings into different kinds of farmhouses based on the building materials in the region.5With modernity, the log cabin became a nostalgic symbol of an unattainable past—a symbol of a simple life, in nature and with nature. Thoreau's cabin in the woods became the archetype for survivalists, counterculture and affluent mainstream dwellers alike. The exhibition showed extraordinary variations of the type from postwar vacation cabins, to the “Parkitecture” holiday cottages in Yellowstone Park, to geodesic domes and micro-houses.The three main themes of this fascinating exhibition—“Shelter,” “Utopia,” and “Porn”—succinctly sum up the iconographic journey of the cabin in the history and culture of the United States from basic shelter to a cultural construct and consumer object. Let's not forget, though, the involuntary housing in cabins promoted by the Rural Rehabilitation Corporations in the United States between the 1930s and the 1980s (and ongoing) to resettle and house socially disadvantaged and homeless families in the countryside (as well as tackle rural poverty) or the emergency relief shelters and refugee camps that provide only temporary solutions to our world's problems.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,822
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,880

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,036
Tête enseignante GPT0,233
Écart entre enseignants0,197 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle