MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4210508361 · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000000861

Stillborn

2015· article· en· W4210508361 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Baruch D. Jakubovic

Notice bibliographique

RevueAcademic Medicine · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésWifeMedicinePsychoanalysisPsychologyPhilosophyTheology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In the middle of the night, I was called to the operating room where a woman in labor had been rushed because of a possible cord prolapse. As a medical student, I had anticipated this part of my pediatrics rotation; at the time, my wife was three months pregnant. When I entered the room, I was struck not by a sense of urgency but by a relatively minor detail. Instead of one neonatal bed, there were two. I realized then that I would be observing my first twin delivery. Within seconds, the first baby’s cry resonated as he was lifted from his mother’s womb. Moments later, the second baby was placed before me. Gazing down, I noticed that she was unresponsive, with a blackened umbilical cord, a large bruise encompassing her abdomen, and generalized skin maceration. Despite our resuscitation efforts, she remained unresponsive. Following a discussion among the medical team, our efforts were halted. She was declared a stillborn. A wave of emotion overtook me. The finality of it was eerie. Before me was a newborn baby whose parents were expecting to hold her in their arms. But now, she was to be wrapped up and covered in blankets, not to be seen at all. Pulling the father to the corner of the room, we revealed the tragic news. Incredibly, he maintained his composure. We asked him to decide whether his wife should be told immediately or later. I could only imagine what he was thinking. He must have been experiencing both joy and sorrow as he tried to balance the elation of becoming a parent with the unequaled pain of losing a child. There were probably already two cribs at home, the double stroller, the diapers, and the books, not to mention the extended family waiting anxiously by their phones to hear what they anticipated would be good news. There he stood, forced into the impossible position of needing to make an immediate choice for his wife. During that interlude, I could not help but identify with him, as I too would soon be a father in a delivery room. What if something went wrong during my baby’s delivery? How would I handle myself if placed in similar circumstances? The possibilities raced through my mind as I watched this new father silently and painstakingly weigh his options. Judging by the ear-shattering shrieking and sobbing that overtook the room, the path he chose was clear. Everyone present was affected. It was time for the pediatrics team to leave the room. At my previous deliveries, the members of the team reintroduced themselves before leaving, congratulated the parents on the birth of their child, and provided a short description of their role in the delivery process. But what should I do now? Do I congratulate the parents on the birth of one child? Do I apologize and say how sorry I am? No choice seemed right. Noticing that the parents were holding each other and crying, I awkwardly left the room without saying a word. As I removed my mask, gown, and gloves, I felt numb. I’m not ashamed to say that I cried and not just a little. How can one possibly prepare for calamity? I suspect no one was ready for what took place, yet everyone completed their duties in spite of the new mother’s cries. Countless other experiences have hit close to home since that night. Through them, I learned to allow patients and their predicaments to percolate just enough to allow for empathy, yet not too much so as to affect my ability to perform my responsibilities. While this lowering of my emotional barricade may lead to tears, I believe that it also has a cathartic benefit. Some would argue that this practice renders me vulnerable; I believe it reveals my humanity. I’ve also learned the importance of reflecting on these experiences with those close to me. Life and death are a part of what I do, and I should not be embarrassed or scared to share these moments or the emotions that they elicit. In the ensuing months, I had many sleepless nights. While I shared this event with a few colleagues and teachers, I was unable to talk about it with the most important person in my life—my pregnant wife. The result was an unshakeable sense of isolation, which writing this piece has only partly remedied. Six months later, I found myself in another delivery room, where my wife gave birth to our first child, a healthy boy of 8 lbs 11 oz. After he was born and my sense of apprehension cleared upon hearing his first loud cry, I did what fathers do. I carefully counted his 10 fingers, 10 toes, two eyes, and one nose. Yet perhaps more than most, I know how to count my blessings. Acknowledgments: The author thanks Dr. Allan S. Detsky for serving as mentor, for encouraging him to retell and reflect on this story, and for commenting on earlier drafts of this essay. He also thanks Dr. Ivor Margolis for his guidance and input on this essay. Baruch D. Jakubovic, MD B.D. Jakubovic is a resident physician, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; e-mail: [email protected]

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,449
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,532

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,126
Tête enseignante GPT0,406
Écart entre enseignants0,280 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAcademic MedicineMême sujetHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseTravaux en français237 207