MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4210671970 · doi:10.1353/mlr.2008.0101

Actividad teatral en la región de Madrid según los protocolos de Juan GarcÃa de Albertos, 1634-1660: Estudio y documentos by Charles Davis, J. E. Varey

2008· article· es· W4210671970 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Modern Language Review · 2008
Typearticle
Languees
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueEarly Modern Spanish Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPraiseParallelsDialogicHumanitiesPhilosophyWonderRelation (database)AdventureLiteratureNarrativeArtSpanish literatureCriticismReading (process)Art historyEpistemologyLinguistics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

MLR, I03.2, 2oo8 569 his self-presentation, yet in his encounter with Don Quixote he shows a surprising capacity foropenness and wonder. His admiratio again demonstrates thatparadox can challenge and expand the categories that informour judgements and actions. Like the other explorations of paradox inDon Quixote, Don Diego's reaction toDon Quixote offers amodel for the reader's response toCervantes's complex and dialogic text. Adventures inParadox follows a significant trend incurrent criticism ofCervantes by interpreting interactions among the characters ofDon Quixote as allegories of the reading process. Presberg refers frequently to the reader's responses to the text, and he makes eclectic use of reception theory.This theoreticalmaterial, however, isnot always convincingly integrated into the larger analysis. Presberg defines paradox at times as a general construct, and at times as a pattern of thought or discourse that can be traced through thehistory ofEuropean literature.His theoretical understanding of paradox isnotably broad, and extends toaspects ofDon Quixote thatcritics have often explicated inother terms, such as the ambiguities of the relationship between history and fictionand the uses of interlaced narratives. A more limited and specific view of paradox might be developed, with reference to the traditional paradoxes thatappear inCervantes's text,and an explicit consideration ofCervantes in relation towriters outside Spain would be helpful. Although Presberg is understandably reluctant to pursue the vexed question ofErasmian influence on Cervantes, his analysis indicates marked parallels between The Praise of Folly and Don Quixote which clearly place Cervantes's work in theEuropean tradition. These are, however, small reservations about a study that makes an important contribution toour understanding of the forms of thought and rhetoric that informDon Quixote. Presberg offers valuable insights when he aligns Cervantes's novel with thegenre of themock encomium and when he describes Don Quixote as a paradoxical figure who induces a response ofwonder and openness inother characters. Adventures inParadox is an essential study for readers interested in the puzzles of logic and storytelling thatCervantes presents to us. UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO STEPHEN RuPP Actividad teatral en la regi6nde Madrid segin losprotocolos deJuan Garcia deAlbertos, I634-I660: estudio y documentos. By CHARLES DAVIS and J.E. VAREY. 2 vols. (Fuentes para la historia del teatro en Espana, 35-36) London: Tamesis. 2003. Vol. 1: 596 pp.; vol. II: 575 pp. kioo (the set). ISBN 978-I-85566-o62-5 (vol. I); 978-I-85566-079-3 (vol. II). In theArchivo Hist6rico de Protocolos deMadrid are housed the registers of legal documents overseen inSpain's capital by the scores ofnotaries who worked in the city. Charles Davis and JohnVarey were not the firstto see thepotential of thisarchive for shedding lighton thehistory of the theatre in earlymodern Spain, whose day-to-day operation depended on the creation of a variety of legal contracts, and the editors acknowledge asmuch in dedicating theirvolumes toCristobal Perez Pastor (i833 I908). Perez Pastor's toils amongst theseprotocolos fed into thepublication a century ago of, interalia, important volumes on Lope de Vega and Calder6n, but, although many of the documents reproduced and studied here had already been published under his name, hismain interest was not in the functioning of theworld of the theatre. By investigating in detail the registers of one of the notaries Perez Pastor had worked on, JuanGarcia de Albertos, Davis and Varey are able tocorrect thedeficien cies of the early twentieth-century publications-some edited from Perez Pastor's notes-and, above all, expand theamount ofmaterial available to scholars. The fuller picture produced sheds a different lighton theatrical activity in and around Madrid in theperiod. Although other notaries' registerswill produce (indeed are already pro ducing) furtherfascinating documents todo with the theatre, the choice ofGarcia de 570 Reviews Albertos is made because in i639 he purchased amonopoly on thewriting of contracts todo with the theatre.Thus his theatrical contracts are particularly numerous in the I640s and i65os, forming a high proportion of the content of his protocolos, and they are fascinatingly rich. Davis and Varey have edited all the 2358 documents, forobvious reasons, by cut ting the legal formulae and limiting their transcriptions to themost relevantmaterial they contain. Nevertheless, in one appendix they provide full transcriptions of ten sample documents of themost common types.These record...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,727
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,276
Écart entre enseignants0,263 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle