Commentary: Paraneoplastic Syndrome Associated with Kelch‐Like Protein 11 Antibodies Presenting with Progressive Ataxia and Tremor
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
With the exception of ocular involvement, the case shows the typical features of a pancerebellar syndrome with dysmetria, vertigo, and axial ataxia (scanned speech and impaired tandem gait).1 In this context, tremor can be classified as “intention” type, according to the recent classification. The occurrence of lip tremor is, however, uncommon, while the head tremor (not visible in the video) can represent a yes-yes type called “titubation.” The positive but unspecific effect of alcohol and the therapeutic attempt with propranolol might indicate a possible diagnosis of essential tremor (ET)-plus. However, ET is an axis-1 diagnosis, which should be reconsidered as soon as an etiology is found. More important, although subtle cerebellar features are possible in ET, cerebellar speech is not characteristic. A confounding aspect is patient's longstanding clumsiness, possibly related to a likely congenital small arachnoid cyst of the posterior fossa.1 The lack of family history of ataxia, the presence of oligoclonal bands, and the progressive atrophy of the cerebellum over a short timeframe are important diagnostic clues, raising autoimmunity, possibly paraneoplastic (given the history of seminoma), as the most probable cause. Several antibodies associate with a pure cerebellar syndrome (eg, anti-GAD65, VGCC, mGluR1, DNER, Sox1, Zic4) including some detected in testicular cancer, although rarely (Ma2). Recently, Kelch-like protein-11 antibodies have been discovered in young men with seminoma, who—interestingly—also featured vertigo as 1 of the presenting signs in roughly 60%.2, 3 Numerous (often >8) unmatched oligoclonal bands may be another pointer to the diagnosis.2, 3 We can only speculate why the neurological syndrome developed several years afterward without evidence of seminoma recurrence. It may be that the immunological response eliminated the tumor or that the immune reaction has become independent of the initial trigger, possibly precipitated by other mechanisms. As in this case, the response to immunotherapy is mixed.2, 3 (1) Research Project: A. Conception, B. Organization, C. Execution; (2) Manuscript Preparation: A. Writing of the First Draft, B. Review and Critique. A.F.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A P.P.: 2B I.O.B.: 2B B.B.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 2B The authors confirm that neither informed patient consent nor the approval of an institutional review board was necessary for this work. We confirm that we have read the Journal's position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this work is consistent with those guidelines. No IRB approval was required for this work. There was no specific funding received for this work. The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest relevant to this work. A.F. is a consultant for Abbott, Inbrain, Ceregate, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Sunovion, Ipsen, and AbbVie. He has received research support from Abbvie, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, University of Toronto, The Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research, and honoraria for serving as a speaker from UCB, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, AbbVie, Sunovion, and Ipsen. I.O.B. is on the advisory boards of Biogen Inc., Boston Scientific, Accorda, and Amneal Pharmaceuticals and is a consultant for LEK Consulting, Ideo Inc., and Humancraft. P.P. and B.B. have no disclosures.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,026 | 0,017 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».