MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4210747191 · doi:10.1353/tj.2021.0132

The Interdisciplinary Theatre of Ping Chong: Exploring Curiosity and Otherness on Stage by Yuko Kurahashi

2021· article· en· W4210747191 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueTheatre Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueTheatre and Performance Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCuriosityPing (video games)ArtArt historyAestheticsVisual artsLiteraturePsychologyComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Interdisciplinary Theatre of Ping Chong: Exploring Curiosity and Otherness on Stage by Yuko Kurahashi James Frieze THE INTERDISCIPLINARY THEATRE OF PING CHONG: EXPLORING CURIOSITY AND OTHERNESS ON STAGE. By Yuko Kurahashi. Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2020; pp. 246. Although “a volume on this subject is sorely overdue” may be the biggest cliché a book reviewer can utter, the statement is unavoidable here. While there is a rich array of essays, interviews, and reviews about him, a book-length study of Ping Chong’s output over half a century has been conspicuous by its absence. The breadth and depth of Chong’s portfolio make the idea of writing a book on this luminary auteur as daunting as it is inviting. As a long-time fan, I picked up Yuko Kurahashi’s tome with a mixture of excitement and fear. What she has produced is a wonderful resource that is as valuable for those new to Chong’s work as it is for those previously familiar. The extensive research and preparation she undertook over many years, including considerable input from Chong himself, is evident throughout a study that is meticulous and efficient, affording attention to every single piece. It is logically structured to identify both key phases in Chong’s artistic career and connections between different pieces. Offering detailed textual analysis, it draws deftly on the full range of academic and journalistic sources, while also making passing but judicious reference to philosophers and theorists such as Gilles Deleuze and Michel de Certeau to help frame themes and ideas. Following periods studying visual art and collaborating choreographically with Meredith Monk, Chong formed his first company in 1975. Ever since, he has continued to write and direct poetic, sometimes documentary, often enigmatic, stage pieces about acculturation. While the oeuvre is varied, it has tended, as Kurahashi delineates, to feature conspicuous clashing of the naturalistic and the symbolic across schemas of movement, speech, and costume to establish character and context in a vivid, [End Page 593] vibrant, but also elegiac fashion. In 1992, he created the first installment of Undesirable Elements, a series of testimonial performances that are still ongoing today, now often directed by Sara Zatz and other members of the company using the template that Chong created. Since 2008, Undesirable Elements has been complemented by a parallel series, Secret History, an in-school education program inculcating sensitivity to differences in which students exchange and process stories from their own experience. The book is chronological in its approach. On its back cover, it is billed as a “biography.” After the first chapter, which does indeed tell the story of Chong’s early life, it is a biography only in the loosest sense of artistic biography. The first chapter thus seems a bit out of place at first glance, as if a life story has been grafted onto a book of criticism. Almost like a ghostwriter for Chong, Kurahashi tells the story of his mother, a singer in the Cantonese opera, and his father, an opera director and librettist, traveling from Guangzhou to the Chinatowns of San Francisco, then to Vancouver, then to Toronto (where Ping is born in 1946), and finally to New York City. Initially, they work in the Cantonese opera in each city, but these opera communities dwindle and most proponents return to China. Ping’s sisters go to Hong Kong to stay with an auntie just before Hong Kong is attacked by the Japanese. In Manhattan, Ping’s father opens a tiny restaurant that becomes famous for its pork buns and egg custard tarts. Kurahashi’s decision to begin a survey of Chong’s artistic career with this intimate, biographical account may seem strange at first, but that is why it works so satisfy-ingly: by providing precisely the strangeness that one gets from Chong’s work as geopolitical stories collide with the micro-politics of experience. Although Ping Chong + Company has always been based in Manhattan, and they are often referenced as a node within New York’s experimental art network, they are also, distinctively, not insiders. Kurahashi underscores that Chong’s work has always been, more than anything, about travel, literally as well as metaphorically. Kurahashi is...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,616
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,045
Tête enseignante GPT0,261
Écart entre enseignants0,216 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle